Skip to content
Merito
← Back to results
EB-1ASports and athleticsIndividualDecided October 2024Dismissed

Outcome: Dismissed

OCT012024_02B2203

High salaryNot metLeading or critical roleNot metMembershipNot metOriginal contributionsNot metPublished materialNot metAwardsClaimed, not analyzedFinal meritsNot met

Our summary

Aquatic coach and instructor claiming EB-1A extraordinary ability in athletics. AAO affirmed denial, finding applicant failed to satisfy three required alternate criteria and lacks sustained national or international acclaim demonstrating extraordinary ability among the very top of field.

Official PDF

Official PDF ↗

Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.

No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.

What was missing

  • High salary · Salary of thirty thousand dollars not established as high relative to field
  • Leading or critical role · Coaching position not shown to be leading role at organization
  • Membership · Swim team membership does not require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts
  • Original contributions · Work does not rise to level of contributions of major significance in field
  • Published material · Competitive swimming accomplishments do not relate to coaching work
  • Final merits · Record lacks evidence establishing sustained national or international acclaim

Criteria

CriterionReadingWhy
High salaryNot metSalary of thirty thousand dollars not established as high relative to field
Leading or critical roleNot metCoaching position not shown to be leading role at organization
MembershipNot metSwim team membership does not require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts
Original contributionsNot metWork does not rise to level of contributions of major significance in field
Published materialNot metCompetitive swimming accomplishments do not relate to coaching work
AwardsClaimed, not analyzedClaimed no major internationally recognized award; not required to establish
Final meritsNot metRecord lacks evidence establishing sustained national or international acclaim

A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.

Similar decisions

Decisions whose text is closest to this one.