Outcome: Dismissed
SEP242024_02B2203
Our summary
An assistant professor claimed extraordinary ability in academia. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding she abandoned some claims and failed to overcome the director's determinations on awards, membership, publications, original contributions, and critical role.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
No criterion in the table was found met in this decision.
What was missing
- Awards · No major internationally recognized award demonstrated
- Leading or critical role · Did not demonstrate significant contribution to organizations themselves
- Membership · No evidence that member organizations use nationally recognized experts to judge outstanding achievements
- Original contributions · Research lacks incremental field recognition despite originality
- Published material · Publications about petitioner not of regulatory required types
- Final merits · Failed to meet three criteria; lacks sustained national or international acclaim
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Not met | No major internationally recognized award demonstrated | |
| Not met | Did not demonstrate significant contribution to organizations themselves | |
| Not met | No evidence that member organizations use nationally recognized experts to judge outstanding achievements | |
| Not met | Research lacks incremental field recognition despite originality | |
| Not met | Publications about petitioner not of regulatory required types | |
| Not met | Failed to meet three criteria; lacks sustained national or international acclaim |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
