Published AAO appeal decisions

Education and public safety specialist seeks EB-2 NIW for proposed security services business and training company. Petitioner qualifies as advanced degree professional but failed to establish national importance of endeavor or evidence of success positioning her to advance it, thus ineligible for waiver.

Employer-sponsored NIW petition for driver information applications engineer beneficiary. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner failed to establish the beneficiary's proposed work has sufficient national importance; benefits limited to employer without broader field-wide implications.

A telecommunications researcher with doctorate proposed advancing machine learning and deep learning research under EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO found her endeavor met national importance but dismissed appeal because publications, nominal peer reliance, and limited demonstrated funding responsibility failed to show she was well positioned to advance it.

A research scientist with a PhD in computer science sought EB-2 NIW for AI research in multimodal machine learning. SCOPS denied NIW but approved advanced degree qualification. The AAO reversed, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: substantial merit and national importance in AI, petitioner well-positioned, and waiver balances beneficially for the United States.

Financial analyst seeking EB-2 with NIW for financial advisory services initiative. AAO found petitioner lacks advanced degree meeting regulatory standard and proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar. Insufficient evidence demonstrated prospective impact on field, employment, or economic benefits at national level.

Lawyer seeking EB-2 advanced degree classification and national interest waiver to establish legal consultancy for sustainable energy. Claimed substantial merit and national importance for Center for Legal Innovation in Sustainable Energy but failed to demonstrate national importance or specific improvements over existing initiatives. AAO dismissed appeal; first and third prongs not established.

A physiotherapist sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed that the petitioner failed to meet the underlying EB-2 exceptional ability requirement at the final merits stage, despite satisfying three initial criteria. Because eligibility for the underlying classification was not established, NIW analysis was waived and the appeal was dismissed.

An attorney sought EB-2 NIW classification for fire safety compliance work. SCOPS initially approved but revoked, finding no national importance. AAO affirmed dismissal, holding that working in an important field alone is insufficient; petitioner must show proposed endeavor's prospective impact reaches national importance level.

Research scientist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for developing artificial intelligence technologies. Decision found proposed endeavor lacks sufficient detail and evidence to establish prospective national importance. Appeal dismissed on first prong failure.

Senior legal advisor with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Service center denied without analyzing evidence against Dhanasar framework. AAO remanded because service center failed to discuss evidence, identify insufficiencies, or explain conclusions for any of the three prongs required for meaningful appellate review.

Senior cloud security architect petitioned for EB-2 NIW by technology company. Petitioner claimed research on AI-driven cybersecurity architectures. AAO found substantial merit but insufficient specificity and no demonstrated national importance beyond employer and clients. Appeal dismissed.

A senior software engineer in automotive manufacturing sought NIW. Employer claimed the beneficiary's work on connected, efficient vehicles serves national interests. AAO found industry and STEM importance insufficient; specific prospective impact of individual's role was not demonstrated.

Regional logistics manager employed by yard management services provider sought national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial, finding broad claims about strategic leadership and industry impact insufficient; specific endeavor showed no prospective national economic benefit or U.S. job creation.

An employer petitions for software engineer beneficiary for EB-2 NIW classification. SCOPS erred by analyzing prior work rather than proposed endeavor, and failed to apply STEM field guidance. AAO withdrew SCOPS decision and remanded for proper analysis of all three Dhanasar prongs with appropriate consideration of software engineering innovation.

Business development manager in pharmaceutical sector seeks EB-2 NIW. SCOPS found petitioner qualified for EB-2 and met second Dhanasar prong. AAO held first prong unmet because petitioner conflated general field importance with specific endeavor's national importance; no prospective impact directly attributable to petitioner's work.

Cloud software developer with master's degree in computer engineering seeking EB-2 advanced degree professional status with national interest waiver for machine learning research. AAO reversed service center on first prong but dismissed appeal because petitioner lacks sufficient track record and advancement capability beyond educational credentials alone.

Senior engineer in AI research seeking NIW under Dhanasar framework for continued research on safe, autonomous AI systems. Service center's denial lacked complete analysis of evidence, made contradictory statements, and failed to address all arguments. Remanded for proper application of all three Dhanasar prongs with complete evidentiary analysis.

Advanced degree professional in human trafficking prevention seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance of specific proposed endeavor. While human trafficking prevention is federally recognized as priority, petitioner's individual work lacks evidence of prospective national or global impact beyond immediate clients. Appeal dismissed.

Soccer coach for academy seeks EB-2 with NIW. AAO found substantial merit but not national importance; work benefits specific employer and clients but lacks broader implications or substantial economic effects at regional or national level. Petitioner waived appeal on remaining prongs.

Beverage company petitions for industrial engineer with advanced degree in quality systems management under EB-2 NIW. Engineer qualifies for underlying EB-2 classification. Proposed work on manufacturing methodologies lacks national importance; focus is company-specific without broader field implications. Appeal dismissed.

Data scientist with master's degree in computational science proposes NIW for research on ethical AI frameworks. SCOPS determined substantial merit existed but national importance not shown. AAO affirmed, finding insufficient evidence that proposed endeavor rises to national importance level; did not address remaining Dhanasar prongs.

A civil engineer with a master's degree in civil engineering sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO agreed he qualified as an advanced degree professional but remanded the case because SCOPS made contradictory statements on national importance and provided no analysis for the well-positioned prong, denying him fair notice.

An engineering corporation sponsored a cost and project controls engineer for EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO upheld the denial, finding the specific endeavor lacked national importance despite work on school district capital projects, as it showed no broader field or economic impact beyond individual projects.

International development specialist with master's in law sought EB-2 with NIW for power sector finance projects. Service center acknowledged advanced degree eligibility. AAO found proposed endeavor lacked specificity and national importance; petitioner's accomplishments misdirected in first Dhanasar prong analysis. Appeal dismissed.

An automotive quality manager sought EB-2 NIW classification. Although the Director found substantial merit and that the petitioner was well-positioned to advance automotive quality improvements, the AAO affirmed dismissal, finding insufficient evidence of national importance beyond general industry benefits.