Published AAO appeal decisions

A semiconductor technology researcher with a Ph.D. sought NIW under Dhanasar. USCIS denied, finding advanced degree qualification but failing all three Dhanasar prongs. AAO remanded, finding USCIS did not meaningfully evaluate the record or address petitioner's evidence.

Software engineer with Ph.D. in electrical engineering seeks NIW for fraud detection platform development. AAO remanded, finding USCIS mischaracterized the endeavor as biomedical and failed to adequately analyze national importance, positioning, and balance prongs under Dhanasar framework.

Electrical engineer sought EB-2 NIW. AAO withdrew SCOPS denial and remanded. Petitioner established substantial merit and national importance of proposed research and that he is well positioned to advance it through education, experience, and expert support. SCOPS must reconsider whether balancing factors favor waiving job offer requirement.

Computer scientist with advanced degree proposed developing computer vision and large language models for drug discovery. AAO found SCOPS failed to adequately analyze whether endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, contained contradictory statements on second prong, and insufficiently analyzed third prong. Decision withdrawn and remanded.

A business administrator sought EB-2 classification as advanced degree professional or person of exceptional ability, plus NIW. SCOPS denied both. The AAO remanded, finding SCOPS misrepresented the record, confused two separate petitions, and did not provide meaningful opportunity to contest. No opinion on ultimate merits.

Senior legal advisor with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Service center denied without analyzing evidence against Dhanasar framework. AAO remanded because service center failed to discuss evidence, identify insufficiencies, or explain conclusions for any of the three prongs required for meaningful appellate review.

An employer petitions for software engineer beneficiary for EB-2 NIW classification. SCOPS erred by analyzing prior work rather than proposed endeavor, and failed to apply STEM field guidance. AAO withdrew SCOPS decision and remanded for proper analysis of all three Dhanasar prongs with appropriate consideration of software engineering innovation.

Senior engineer in AI research seeking NIW under Dhanasar framework for continued research on safe, autonomous AI systems. Service center's denial lacked complete analysis of evidence, made contradictory statements, and failed to address all arguments. Remanded for proper application of all three Dhanasar prongs with complete evidentiary analysis.

A civil engineer with a master's degree in civil engineering sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO agreed he qualified as an advanced degree professional but remanded the case because SCOPS made contradictory statements on national importance and provided no analysis for the well-positioned prong, denying him fair notice.

Mechanical engineer with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for semiconductor manufacturing advancement. Service center denied without adequate explanation of Dhanasar prongs analysis. AAO remanded for new decision because service center failed to explain rationale and adequately address petitioner's proposed endeavor rather than employment position.

An advanced manufacturing engineer seeks EB-2 with NIW. The AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but found the petitioner did not adequately demonstrate national importance of the specific endeavor. The decision remanded for the director to reconsider the third prong using STEM-field guidance from policy manual.