Published AAO appeal decisions

A mechanical engineer and project manager with an advanced degree proposed continuing infrastructure work in energy and oil-gas sectors. The AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance because his work would not extend beyond clients with broader implications, and he made impermissible material changes to his endeavor.

A controls engineer sought NIW for EB-2 under Dhanasar to advance Industry 4.0 manufacturing modernization. The AAO found him not well-positioned to advance the endeavor, lacking Ph.D. credentials, demonstrated influence in the field, and evidence of interest from relevant parties beyond his employer.

An automotive company petitioned to employ a process controls engineer under EB-2 NIW, claiming the EV battery assembly work has national importance. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar's first prong, as impact appears limited to employer and immediate business partners rather than industry-wide.

Mechanical engineer employed in advanced driver assistance systems sought national interest waiver. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked sufficient concrete examples of broad impact and petitioner did not establish ownership of intellectual property or impact beyond specific employer, failing the substantial merit and national importance prong.

Research engineer with mechanical engineering doctorate sought EB-2 NIW for HVAC&R systems research. AAO found the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to show he is well positioned to advance it without his current employment, lacking independent funding and demonstrating field adoption.

An automotive manufacturer petitioned for EB-1A classification for a motorsports aerodynamics engineer. The petitioner claimed published material, original contributions, and high salary. The AAO found the publication not sufficiently authoritative, citations not demonstrable as significant, and wage comparisons not appropriately benchmarked, dismissing the appeal.

An industrial engineer with a doctorate in transportation engineering sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for predictive maintenance research. The AAO dismissed, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor despite meeting the first prong.

A mechanical engineer sought a national interest waiver for an EB-2 employment-based petition. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to establish that the proposed thermal management research endeavor has national importance, the first Dhanasar prong required for waiver eligibility.

Metal fabrication Project Procurement Manager seeks NIW for EB-2 classification. Petitioner claimed endeavor modernizes U.S. infrastructure and bridges. AAO dismissed appeal, finding endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because impact is limited to specific clients and projects, not the broader metal fabrication or construction industry.

An employer petitioned for a quality assurance manager in aerospace manufacturing, seeking EB-2 advanced degree classification with a national interest waiver. The service center denied it. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding the endeavor lacked national importance because its impact was confined to the employer and economic benefits were too attenuated, so other prongs were not reached.

A global vehicle manufacturer petitioned for a vice president of vehicle engineering to receive extraordinary ability classification. The AAO found the beneficiary did not meet the awards, membership, or high salary criteria and failed the final merits determination, concluding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim.

An employer petitioned for a national interest waiver for an EB-2 advanced degree professional working on sustainable semiconductor lithography systems. The AAO agreed with SCOPS that while the beneficiary's work has substantial merit, the petitioner failed to demonstrate its national importance; benefits limited to specific employer and field importance alone do not satisfy the first Dhanasar prong.

A mechanical engineer sought EB-2 NIW for advanced manufacturing systems. Between filing and appeal, he materially changed his proposed endeavor to intelligent road-signaling systems. AAO dismissed, holding petitioner failed to establish substantive nature of work he proposes and cannot remedy filing deficiencies with materially different evidence on appeal.

Research associate with master's in mechanical engineering sought EB-2 NIW to continue carbon capture and sustainable aviation fuel research. First prong met. AAO affirmed second prong failure: education strong but lacks Ph.D., plan insufficient, no documented role in obtaining funding; appeal dismissed.

Marine engineer and FSRU vessel manager sought NIW under Dhanasar framework. Despite EB-2 qualification, petitioner failed to establish national importance of specific endeavor in shipbuilding and energy security. References to federal programs insufficient without demonstrating direct involvement. Appeal dismissed.

Project engineer seeking EB-2 NIW for advanced simulation software development in mechanical engineering. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; impact on field insufficient and not extending beyond employer to justify waiver. Appeal dismissed.

A mechanical engineer with an advanced degree sought an NIW for a proposed endeavor in ultrasonic guided-wave damage detection for infrastructure. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to establish national importance of the specific endeavor despite its STEM and emerging-technology focus.

An aerospace engineer with a Ph.D. seeking EB-2 with NIW for fatigue/damage tolerance research demonstrated the first Dhanasar prong but failed the second, lacking evidence his work influenced the field or represented record of success in advancing the endeavor.

Senior reliability engineer with Ph.D. in mechanical engineering sought NIW for continued work in consumer electronics hardware reliability testing. AAO found work lacked national importance; specific endeavor did not have broader implications beyond assigned hardware modules despite field importance.

A manufacturing engineer in the automotive sector sought an EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver, claiming the work would improve manufacturing efficiency. The decision is an NIW case, not extraordinary ability. The appeal was dismissed because the national importance of the specific endeavor was not shown beyond the employer's plant.

Beverage company petitions for industrial engineer with advanced degree in quality systems management under EB-2 NIW. Engineer qualifies for underlying EB-2 classification. Proposed work on manufacturing methodologies lacks national importance; focus is company-specific without broader field implications. Appeal dismissed.

Mechanical engineer with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for semiconductor manufacturing advancement. Service center denied without adequate explanation of Dhanasar prongs analysis. AAO remanded for new decision because service center failed to explain rationale and adequately address petitioner's proposed endeavor rather than employment position.

An advanced manufacturing engineer seeks EB-2 with NIW. The AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but found the petitioner did not adequately demonstrate national importance of the specific endeavor. The decision remanded for the director to reconsider the third prong using STEM-field guidance from policy manual.

A mechanical engineer and postdoctoral researcher sought NIW for research on catalysts for fuel cells and batteries. AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied: proposed research has national importance for U.S. competitiveness, petitioner is well positioned to advance it, and waiver benefits the United States.

Automotive parts company petitions for software verification and validation engineer with advanced degree under EB-2 NIW. Engineer qualifies for underlying EB-2 classification. Proposed work on regulatory compliance lacks national importance; does not demonstrate new advancements or significant impact beyond company operations. Appeal dismissed.