Published AAO appeal decisions

Senior software engineer with PhD in computer science proposes distributed query optimization research. AAO found the research endeavor meritorious but distinguished between proposed independent research and employer-specific benefits, finding the latter lacks national importance. Petition dismissed because petitioner failed second prong.

A software engineer sought NIW for cloud computing work. AAO agreed that although the field has substantial merit, the petitioner's specific proposed endeavor lacks national importance. Petitioner failed to demonstrate broader implications beyond his company or how his work would impact the industry or region more broadly.

An audio-visual agency filed for a cinematographer and drone cameraman with extraordinary ability. The AAO found he met two criteria (judging and exhibitions) but failed the third-criterion threshold and final merits test for sustained acclaim at field leadership level.

AI manufacturer petitioned for beneficiary's EB-2 national interest waiver. Beneficiary qualified for underlying EB-2 but failed NIW Dhanasar first prong; proposed work lacked demonstrated national importance and broader implications beyond company and clients.

Physician and research fellow in immunology sought EB-1A classification. Met two criteria: published material and judging. Awards not recognized for field excellence; original contributions not demonstrated as major significance. Failed three-criterion threshold. Appeal dismissed.

Employer-sponsored semiconductor engineer with master's degree seeks EB-2 national interest waiver for system-level test development work. Claimed endeavor has national importance due to semiconductor industry value and testing standard implications. AAO found importance of field insufficient; specific proposed endeavor lacks demonstrated broader prospective impact.

Computer scientist with master's degree in engineering proposed advancing AI research in deep learning for data analysis and virtual assistants. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but petitioner is not well positioned to advance it due to insufficient record of success and impact. Appeal dismissed on second prong failure.

Computer scientist employed as engineering associate proposed developing proprietary software for AI safety and trust. AAO affirmed denial because proposed work lacked national importance, benefiting only the specific employer despite national footprint, even though petitioner was well positioned.

Attorney specializing in intellectual property and cybercrime seeking EB-2 NIW proposed consulting business with claimed job creation and tax benefits. AAO dismissed, finding endeavor lacks sufficient national importance and evidence does not demonstrate broader impact on field beyond specific business and clients.

A software engineer was the beneficiary of an EB-1A petition filed by an AI software company, which the service center denied for failing three of ten criteria. The AAO dismissed the appeal as moot because a separate immigrant petition was approved and the beneficiary became a permanent resident, so no criteria were decided.

Physician-researcher proposing cancer research claims national interest waiver. AAO found first prong met: research has national importance. However, second prong failed: evidence from references lacked specific examples of research impact or progress, and citation metrics did not adequately demonstrate exceptional success.

A drug addiction treatment center petitioned for an EB-2 national interest waiver for an IT operations manager beneficiary. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; recommendation letters focused on the beneficiary's individual qualifications and organizational impact only, not industry-wide or profession-wide benefit.

A mechanical engineer sought EB-2 NIW for advanced manufacturing systems. Between filing and appeal, he materially changed his proposed endeavor to intelligent road-signaling systems. AAO dismissed, holding petitioner failed to establish substantive nature of work he proposes and cannot remedy filing deficiencies with materially different evidence on appeal.

Mechanical engineer seeking EB-2 NIW for renewable energy research. AAO found proposed endeavor meets first prong: substantial merit and national importance in solar power advancement. However, petitioner not well positioned to advance it; published research lacks demonstrated industry impact and no continued research documented post-degree. Appeal dismissed.

Technology company petitioned for senior director in customer experience as EB-1A extraordinary ability. Employer established at least three evidentiary criteria, but AAO found limited, recent evidence does not demonstrate sustained acclaim or placement among small percentage at top of field; appeal dismissed.

A systems engineer sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO dismissed, finding the petitioner failed to establish the national importance of the proposed consulting endeavor under the first Dhanasar prong, with broad claims and formulaic support letters lacking credibility.

Clinical pharmacologist employed by biopharmaceutical company met three initial evidentiary criteria but lacked sustained national or international acclaim demonstrating placement among the very top of field in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics; appeal dismissed on final merits.

Pilot sought EB-2 national interest waiver for aviation training endeavor. AAO found proposed work has substantial merit but lacks national importance under Dhanasar's first prong. Letters of support insufficient; no evidence of broader industry impact or substantial positive economic effects. Second and third prongs not reached.

Computer security researcher sought EB-2 NIW to continue research on software security tools for consumer devices and services. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance; evidence focused on petitioner's qualifications and field importance rather than proposed endeavor's prospective impact beyond employer.

An electrical engineer sought NIW for work in renewable solar energy. AAO agreed with USCIS that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance under Dhanasar's first prong. Petitioner failed to demonstrate specific methodologies, unique advances, or prospective impact beyond his employer. Appeal dismissed without reaching remaining Dhanasar prongs.

A financial director and entrepreneur with an advanced degree in finance sought NIW for work as finance director at a used car dealership. The AAO found her original endeavor lacked substantial merit and national importance due to vague descriptions and generic claims about economic benefits without specific, prospective impact evidence.

A researcher and assistant professor sought NIW for EB-2 under Dhanasar. The AAO agreed the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but concluded the petitioner was not well-positioned to advance it, lacking demonstrated influence, institutional support, or feasible funding for research plans.

Senior security researcher seeks NIW for cybersecurity innovations. AAO dismissed finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance; work benefits only specific employers and clients without broader field or national security implications.

Cybersecurity engineer employed as head of detection engineering sought EB-1A classification. Met initial three criteria: judging, scholarly articles, leading role, and high salary. However, final merits analysis found insufficient sustained national or international acclaim to demonstrate extraordinary ability at top percentage level.

Data scientist with master's degree in computer science; employed in software engineering roles in H-1B status. Met three criteria but failed final merits determination. AAO upheld denial, finding evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement among field's elite despite meeting evidentiary threshold.