Published AAO appeal decisions

A researcher in cancer therapeutics using biotechnology tools sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding the proposed research demonstrated substantial merit and national importance, the petitioner was well positioned to advance it, and on balance waiving the job offer would benefit the United States.

Architect sought NIW for EB-2 classification. AAO dismissed the appeal due to invalid electronic signatures on appeal forms (I-290B and G-28) not meeting regulatory requirements for original signatures. Additionally, petitioner failed to contest Director's adverse finding on the dispositive second prong of Dhanasar analysis.

Industrial and quality engineer seeks EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. AAO affirmed dismissal partly because petitioner abandoned appeal arguments regarding national importance by failing to respond to Director's analysis. Also found first Dhanasar prong unmet.

An anti-corruption and investigations specialist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for police department work. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner ineligible for the underlying EB-2 classification and that the proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.

Communications specialist with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to establish national importance of proposed sustainability communications endeavor; industry importance does not substitute for specific endeavor impact.

A ship trading company sponsored a marine project manager for EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional or exceptional ability individual, and later argued it intended a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the beneficiary did not qualify for the underlying EB-2 classification, and the waiver was not reached.

Electrical engineer employed to provide energy efficiency consulting and audits seeks NIW. AAO affirmed denial because proposed work lacks national importance; local impact on customers insufficient. Petitioner failed to show broader implications or substantial economic effects required under Dhanasar first prong.

Public school employer petitioned for high school science teacher beneficiary as extraordinary ability. Beneficiary met only two criteria: judging and high salary. Award not major and internationally recognized. Did not meet three-criterion threshold or demonstrate sustained acclaim. Appeal dismissed.

Accounting and financial services company sponsored beneficiary for NIW as advanced degree professional. Claimed national importance through accounting and tax preparation services. AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance because proposed work would not extend beyond company clientele to impact field or economy at national level.

Financial manager seeking EB-2 with NIW for business consulting platform. Qualified for EB-2 advanced degree category. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; benefits do not extend beyond employer and clients to impact field or national economy.

Restaurant petitioned for O-1A classification of executive chef claiming extraordinary ability in the culinary arts. AAO dismissed appeal because beneficiary failed to establish any of the required evidentiary criteria, with evidence containing credibility and consistency issues.

Employer sponsored beneficiary in business field for EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO affirmed denial: beneficiary did not receive major internationally recognized award individually, and record did not satisfy three of ten criteria. Award granted to employer, not beneficiary. Overall record lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim.

Project director seeking EB-2 advanced degree and NIW for renewable energy and SME development work. AAO dismissed appeal, finding endeavor ill-defined with three shifting descriptions. Substantial merit finding withdrawn; national importance not demonstrated. Even if first two prongs met, third prong failed due to insufficient evidence of factors favoring waiver.

Researcher, teacher, and policy adviser sought EB-2 advanced degree classification and NIW. AAO reversed director on national importance prong but affirmed denial on second prong: published research does not prove petitioner well positioned to advance the specific proposed endeavor without additional evidence of progress or success.

Agronomist engineer sought EB-2 advanced degree classification and NIW. AAO affirmed denial because proposed endeavor lacked national importance; petitioner failed to articulate specific projects or goals beyond routine occupational duties that would demonstrate broader industry impact.

Entrepreneur in financial consulting holding advanced degree applied for EB-2 with NIW under Dhanasar framework. Director found substantial merit but denied national importance; AAO affirmed. Petitioner's consulting business lacked evidence of specific endeavor having prospective impact beyond own clients and employees.

Veterinary dentist sought EB-2 NIW as exceptional ability professional. AAO dismissed after affirming director's finding that petitioner lacks required U.S. doctoral or foreign equivalent degree and failed final merits determination for exceptional ability.

Mechanical engineer seeking national interest waiver for EB-2 exceptional ability classification. Petitioner proposed either employment or founding consulting startup. AAO found proposed endeavor lacked specific national importance; generalized industry references insufficient under Dhanasar; appeal dismissed.

Executive sous chef in O-1 visa status sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner met none of three analyzed criteria: published material lacked evidence of being about him, high salary fell below top earners, and evidence insufficient for leading or critical role finding.

Executive assistant sought EB-2 NIW with goal of event management role. Petitioner significantly changed proposed endeavor from initial petition to RFE response, creating ambiguity. AAO found endeavor could not be analyzed under Dhanasar framework due to inconsistent articulation.

Vascular researcher with Ph.D. in medical cell biology seeking EB-2 NIW. Proposed advancing critical bioinformatics and biomechanical research. AAO sustained, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: endeavor has national importance, petitioner well positioned to advance it, and waiver would benefit US.

IT network and cybersecurity engineer seeking national interest waiver claimed his proposed work serves national importance. AAO held that day-to-day engineering services lack broader implications required for national importance, dismissing appeal on first Dhanasar prong.

Fitness director at martial arts academy sought EB-2 advanced degree with NIW. AAO affirmed denial: petitioner qualified for EB-2 but failed first Dhanasar prong because proposed endeavor lacked national importance; evidence addressed generalized fitness benefits rather than specific endeavor's national implications.