Published AAO appeal decisions

Information technology service delivery manager sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Appeal dismissed. Petitioner had invalid signature on Form I-290B. Substantively, although petitioner met two initial criteria, evidence demonstrated only local or organizational recognition, not the sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

Artificial intelligence graduate researcher failed to meet three-criterion threshold. AAO found competition awards not nationally recognized; ChatGPT-sourced supporting documents deemed unreliable. With only two criteria potentially met, final merits analysis reserved as unnecessary.

Enterprise account engineer sought national interest waiver under EB-2, proposing consulting services to SMEs for cloud migration and cybersecurity modernization. AAO found endeavor lacked sufficient evidence of prospective national importance, focusing on her individual consulting work rather than field-wide or broader economic impact.

Computer engineer with 2023 PhD in electrical engineering claimed three criteria. Two were accepted at service center level. AAO affirmed original contributions not met because citations and support letters reflect only incremental research progress, not widespread field recognition of major significance. Appeal dismissed.

Ph.D. candidate in computer science developing AI models for e-commerce claimed four criteria. AAO affirmed judging and scholarly articles but rejected published material and original contributions. Limited field adoption and insufficient impact preclude extraordinary ability finding.

IT consultant from Brazil sought EB-1A classification claiming seven criteria. AAO found one criterion met (scholarly articles) but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim and top-tier recognition required for extraordinary ability.

A computer scientist with a Ph.D. in computer science seeks EB-2 with NIW. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding she misunderstood national importance requirements and failed to show her proposed endeavor would impact the field broadly. Routine or incremental contributions without broader implications do not satisfy the Dhanasar standard.

Cybersecurity professional with master's degree sought EB-2 NIW for developing post-quantum cryptography toolkits for small and medium institutions. AAO found endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance: proposed work and supporting evidence did not establish prospective impact, funding plan, timeline, or scale of utilization commensurate with national benefit.

A postdoctoral researcher in machine learning and energy systems claimed EB-1A extraordinary ability. The AAO held he met only two criteria (judging and scholarly articles) but failed on original contributions and leading role, thus not meeting the three-criterion threshold.

A systems engineer sought an NIW but failed to demonstrate national importance for his endeavor. The AAO found his business plans and impact claims too general and localized; assertions about secondary ripple effects and industry alignment did not satisfy Dhanasar's requirement for substantial positive economic effects or broad field advancement.

A computer science engineer in management positions sought EB-1A classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to meet three required evidentiary criteria, and declined to reach the final merits determination.

Petitioner is a cybersecurity professional proposing to advance Internet of Things security in critical infrastructure. The AAO dismissed the appeal finding substantial merit but lacking national importance; petitioner's skills and client-focused work do not demonstrate broader implications rising to national importance level required.

An information security analyst holding a master's in cybersecurity operations sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a cybersecurity consulting firm. The AAO found the applicant demonstrated substantial merit but lacked evidence of the specific endeavor's national importance. General industry importance and alignment with federal priorities were insufficient.

Information technology and AI professional claimed extraordinary ability. USCIS found three criteria met: judging, scholarly articles, and leading roles. Final merits determination concluded petitioner lacked sustained national or international acclaim required for top-tier field status. Appeal dismissed; unpublished district court ruling not binding.

A COO with master's degree sought EB-2 NIW for a business providing global internet connectivity and cloud services. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor's field is important but the specific endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance, broader implications, or substantial projected economic effects required under Dhanasar.

Data protection and technology specialist with advanced degrees sought national interest waiver for developing digital-identity systems. AAO affirmed denial, holding past experience and industry publications about importance of field do not establish prospective impact of specific proposed endeavor.

A senior software engineer in artificial intelligence and cloud computing claimed extraordinary ability and met three evidentiary criteria at service center level. On appeal, the AAO reviewed totality of evidence including technical innovations, scholarly works, and professional leadership. The AAO found insufficient demonstration of sustained national or international acclaim or elite status and dismissed.

A cybersecurity specialist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The petitioner met three alternate criteria but failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top in the field. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding peer review activities isolated, published articles lacked prestige, and compensation lacked proper contextualization.

Supply chain and materials management professional met three initial EB-1A criteria through published material, judging, and critical role. However, AAO affirmed dismissal because evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that petitioner rose to the small percentage at the very top of his field.

Mathematical and electrical engineering researcher sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Motion to reopen granted on advanced degree issue but dismissed on merits. Proposed medical imaging research endeavor too vague at filing date; potential impacts on field and national initiatives lacked sufficient direct evidentiary support despite prior research accomplishments.

Software test automation engineer met all seven claimed initial criteria. However, AAO affirmed denial at final merits stage, finding evidence concentrated in 2024-2025 lacks sustained national or international acclaim. Work influence confined within company; does not demonstrate top-tier field standing.

Software engineer proposing AI infrastructure development for large language models advancing U.S. innovation seeks NIW under EB-2. AAO remanded because record was incomplete with illegible exhibits and SCOPS did not fully evaluate all three Dhanasar prongs. Petitioner to resubmit clear copies and articulate national importance and balance analysis.

A cloud technology expert sought extraordinary ability classification. After two prior denials and reopenings by the service center, a third denial was issued without affording the petitioner thirty days to submit a brief as required by regulation. The AAO remanded to cure the procedural defect.

A research scientist in machine learning and generative AI claimed six criteria. The service center accepted four of them, then denied the petition at the final merits stage. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the fellowship award and limited media coverage did not show sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.