Published AAO appeal decisions

A power electronics researcher sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to define a specific proposed endeavor, instead providing only broad aspirational statements about developing experimental setups for semiconductors, making all three Dhanasar prongs unadjustable.

An electronics engineer proposed a business offering technical support and consulting to television and streaming enterprises and self-petitioned for EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO dismissed, holding the proposed endeavor lacks substantial merit and national importance because it shows no significant potential for employment, economic impact, or contribution to advancing technology or field.

A microelectronics engineer with a master's degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver for research on hardware for AI data centers. The AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but concluded the petitioner lacked sufficient expertise advancement credentials and that waiving job requirements would not benefit the nation.

Electrical engineer sought EB-1A classification based on extraordinary ability. Claimed awards, membership, published material, judging, contributions, and leading role. Service center found two criteria met; AAO found awards and membership not met and concluded petitioner lacked sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.

Electronics engineer in telecommunications seeks NIW for EB-2 self-employment in fiber optic services. Petitioner claimed national importance based on Federal Fiber to Home alignment. AAO dismissed, finding the specific endeavor lacks national importance despite working in important field; general industry alignment insufficient without evidence of broader prospective impact.

An electrician in industrial maintenance and automation sought NIW as EB-2 member of professions. AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar. Individual company consultancy services lack sufficient scale, employment potential, or economic effects to rise to national level.

Electrical engineer with doctoral degree proposes power grid research on renewable energy integration. AAO found substantial merit and national importance met, but rejected well-positioned prong due to insufficient evidence of research success and impact, and rejected balance prong as contributions do not outweigh labor certification benefits.

An electrical engineer with a foreign Master's degree sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed research endeavor lacks the national or global implications required to establish national importance, and the petitioner is not well-positioned to advance it.

An electrical engineer with an advanced degree sought NIW for employment-based second preference. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding that her proposed research in GaN-based power electronics for EV charging lacked the requisite national importance under Dhanasar; benefits to specific employers and vague assertions of potential impact were insufficient.

Electrical engineer with master's and doctoral degrees from Iran proposing renewable energy research. AAO held petitioner satisfied only two of ten criteria (judging, scholarly articles); failed to establish original contributions of major significance; appeal dismissed.

An electrical engineering consultant seeking a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification to enhance U.S. energy resilience through microgrid development. AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance because impacts were limited to specific clients rather than demonstrating broad national effects.

Self-petitioner, electrical engineer with Ph.D., seeks national interest waiver for EB-2 to develop computer-aided design tools for IC packaging design. Petitioner holds advanced STEM degree but failed to establish being well-positioned to advance proposed research; lacked specificity linking past work to endeavor and did not demonstrate field impact or funding generation comparable to precedent.

An avionics specialist sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification together with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because he did not show ten years of full-time experience with reliable evidence, so he lacked the underlying classification and the waiver analysis was not reached.

Electrical engineer in semiconductor power electronics sought EB-1A classification. Petitioner met three evidentiary criteria including scholarly articles, high salary, and judging work. However, AAO dismissed appeal because evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim necessary to establish placement among the small percentage at the field's very top.

Postdoctoral candidate in electrical engineering with Master's degree sought EB-2 NIW for research in machine learning applications. AAO affirmed Service Center denial, finding endeavor has national importance but petitioner is not well positioned to advance it, lacking sufficient evidence of field influence or relevant party interest.

An electrical engineering Ph.D. candidate sought EB-2 national interest waiver for research on power electronics for renewable energy. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but the petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance it via her research record and impact.

An electrical engineer sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO found petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate that the specific proposed endeavor of providing engineering services had national importance under the Dhanasar framework. Lacking prospective impact evidence, the petition was dismissed without reaching remaining prongs.

Engineer seeking NIW for electrical engineering consulting startup. Petitioner claimed endeavor had national importance for energy systems and sustainability. AAO dismissed motion, finding articles showed field importance but not specific endeavor impact or prospective national significance.

A chemical engineer in nondestructive testing sought EB-1A classification. On motion to reconsider, he disputed the dismissal of his appeal without presenting new evidence or facts. The AAO found he failed to establish three required criteria and upheld the dismissal.

Electrical engineer proposing specialized consulting company seeking EB-2 with NIW. AAO affirmed underlying EB-2 eligibility but dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite focus on modernization and sustainability.

Electrical engineer seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Claimed advanced degree based on bachelor's plus five years foreign experience and proposed AI-driven manufacturing modernization. AAO dismissed because foreign employment documentation was insufficient and proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance beyond local economic activity.

An electrical engineer with an MBA sought EB-2 classification and NIW for a consulting firm offering process safety and sustainable energy services. The proposed endeavor lacks national importance; it does not extend beyond the petitioner's employer and clients to impact the field broadly or employ disadvantaged workers.

Electrical engineer claiming EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO agreed first prong met but found petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance proposed research endeavor, lacking evidence of grant funding, significant research impact, or specific future plan. Appeal dismissed.

Electrical engineer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver to work as independent contractor in automotive manufacturing. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance because evidence does not show broader field implications, job creation potential, or substantial economic benefits beyond individual work.

A mechanical engineer and researcher with doctorate pursuing research on electric motor efficiency and AI integration. The AAO found the first prong met as the research addresses critical emerging technologies, but dismissed because petitioner failed to demonstrate institutional interest or funding securing his well-positioning to advance the research.