Published AAO appeal decisions

Financial advisor and entrepreneur seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver proposes to grow small and medium-sized enterprises and improve tax systems. AAO held she lacked advanced degree eligibility; also did not establish national importance of the specific endeavor, as projections were uncorroborated and methods lacked demonstrated innovation or broader field implications.

Musician and band founder seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner met four regulatory criteria but AAO dismissed appeal, finding evidence insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or career reflecting small percentage at very top of field.

Mechanical engineer researcher self-petitioner sought NIW under EB-2 for thermal battery development research. AAO affirmed first prong met but reversed on second prong, finding PhD degree and citations insufficient to demonstrate she is well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.

Financial manager with eight years finance and four years management experience in Kazakhstan sought extraordinary ability classification claiming seven criteria. AAO found only judging criterion met (from SCOPS). Rejected awards, membership, original contributions, scholarly articles, and exhibitions. Appeal dismissed due to insufficient criteria satisfaction.

A legal consultant sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO held that the petitioner did not meet any of the ten evidentiary criteria and failed the threshold initial evidence requirement, so a final merits determination was not reached.

Fitness trainer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met two of ten regulatory criteria: published material and leading critical role. Claimed membership, original contributions, scholarly articles, and commercial success but AAO found none satisfied. Without three criteria met, final merits analysis not reached.

A software quality assurance engineer met three initial evidentiary criteria for EB-1A extraordinary ability. However, the final merits determination found the record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that petitioner was in the small percentage at the very top of the field, so appeal was dismissed.

A chief executive officer with a medical degree sought EB-2 classification and NIW for a healthcare startup. The proposed endeavor met substantial merit but lacked demonstrated national importance. Projections lacked detail; techniques were not shown as sufficiently innovative or distinct; no broad field impact or employment of disadvantaged workers established.

Content developer and influencer from Brazil sought extraordinary ability classification. Claimed six criteria. Decision found only one criterion met and withdrew SCOPS finding on exhibitions. Appeal dismissed because petitioner failed to satisfy three required criteria.

Software developer sought NIW with advanced degree. Proposed autonomous vehicle safety research. AAO found petitioner not well positioned to advance proposed endeavor under Dhanasar second prong: master's degree and citations insufficient without prior funding, government interest, or validated model comparable to Dhanasar precedent. First and third prongs reserved.

Commercial pilot from Panama sought NIW for EB-2. AAO held petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability: only two criteria met (degree and license), not three required. Insufficient evidence of ten years experience, exceptional salary, professional association membership, or industry recognition. Underlying visa eligibility denied; NIW not analyzed.

Postdoctoral fellow in biomedical research sought EB-2 NIW with advanced degree. Proposed cancer research endeavor met substantial merit and national importance, but AAO found petitioner not well positioned to advance it: lacking significant funded grant record, evidence of work adoption by others, or comprehensive future plan despite strong academic credentials.

An IT consultant sought EB-2 with national interest waiver to establish a consultancy serving the pharmaceutical industry. The AAO affirmed dismissal because his business plan, though showing substantial merit, lacked sufficient evidence that the methodology had been adopted in industry or would significantly benefit the national economy.

Lawyer seeks NIW for EB-2 classification to establish immigration law firm providing legal services to immigrants. AAO found proposed endeavor lacked national importance; petitioner did not demonstrate how services would differ from existing firms or impact field broadly; appeal dismissed.

International legal advisor in business consulting seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner claimed endeavor had national importance through ecosystem strengthening and cross-border business benefits. AAO held first Dhanasar prong unmet: proposed endeavor lacks documented national importance; cited evidence addresses general field trends, not specific endeavor impact; insufficient proof of substantial economic benefits.

AI researcher seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver claimed substantial merit, national importance, positioning to advance, and balance favoring waiver under Dhanasar. AAO found first prong met but rejected second and third prongs: petitioner lacks completed degree, secured funding, or concrete employment plans; waiver not shown beneficial to United States.

A cybersecurity specialist seeks NIW as an EB-2 advanced degree professional. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner did not possess an advanced degree at filing and the proposed endeavor—personal career advancement—lacks the national importance required under the first Dhanasar prong.

A salsa dancer, choreographer, and instructor self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability. The AAO dismissed motions to reopen and reconsider, finding she met three criteria but failed final merits determination showing sustained acclaim at the very top of her field.

A geologist sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. After an earlier appeal and several motions were dismissed, the petitioner filed a combined motion to reopen and reconsider. The AAO dismissed both: the delay in the prior late motion was not shown reasonable or beyond his control, and no legal error was identified.

Agricultural scientist seeking EB-2 national interest waiver for climate-resilient farming research. AAO found proposed endeavor met substantial merit and national importance prong but applicant failed second prong: master's degrees and publication record insufficient to establish she is well positioned to advance the endeavor. Third prong not addressed due to failure on second prong.

An electrical engineering Ph.D. candidate sought EB-2 national interest waiver for research on power electronics for renewable energy. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but the petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance it via her research record and impact.

Business management professional self-petitioner seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met three initial criteria but AAO found no sustained national or international acclaim, with internal awards only from 2007-2009, failing final merits determination.

A self-petitioner seeking extraordinary ability classification had the petition denied, then lost an appeal and five motions. This sixth combined motion to reopen and reconsider was dismissed. The AAO found no new facts, no legal or policy error, and no basis to excuse the earlier untimely filing, which was within the petitioner's control.

A machine learning research scientist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. The AAO found him qualified as an advanced degree holder with substantial merit work, but dismissed the appeal because his specific proposed endeavor lacked proven national importance despite citations and research funding.