AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
5,153 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-2 NIWArts, design, architectureNov 2024Dismissed
An architect with advanced degree and self-employment in Brazil sought EB-2 NIW for a sustainable affordable housing venture. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding the petitioner failed the first Dhanasar prong: while affordable housing is nationally important, the petitioner did not demonstrate her specific proposed endeavor would have national importance. Remaining prongs were not reached.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWSports and athleticsNov 2024Dismissed
Airline pilot sought EB-2 as individual of exceptional ability with national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner met four of six initial criteria but dismissed appeal on final merits, concluding evidence did not establish degree of expertise significantly above ordinarily encountered in field.
0 of 1 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWSoftware engineeringNov 2024Dismissed
Software developer seeks NIW claiming field importance. AAO agreed petitioner failed to identify specific endeavor or demonstrate national importance; general assertions about software development do not establish impact beyond employer or customer base.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWData science and analyticsNov 2024Dismissed
Petitioner with advanced degree proposes data analytics and AI solutions company for healthcare. Claimed national importance via government recognition of AI in healthcare and societal welfare impact. AAO affirmed dismissal; endeavor lacks demonstrable national importance; benefits confined to prospective clients without substantial positive economic effects.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaNov 2024Dismissed
Archaeologist with Egyptian Ph.D. in Islamic archaeology seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver for research comparing African American and Mamluk civilizations. First prong met; teaching and media production endeavors lacked sufficient specificity. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner failed second prong: education alone insufficient to show well-positioned status without demonstrated research success or external support.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaNov 2024Dismissed
A university professor and administrator seeks an EB-2 NIW to operate a higher education consulting business using a proprietary algorithm. The AAO dismissed, finding substantial merit but no evidence the business would broadly impact the field or achieve national importance.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherOct 2024Dismissed
A commercial pilot and flight instructor sought NIW as EB-2 advanced degree professional claiming to address pilot shortage. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor too vaguely defined and lacking evidence that his work would have substantial merit or national importance despite aviation industry challenges.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalOct 2024Dismissed
Healthcare entrepreneur proposed establishing a company offering professional training courses. AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance; proposed business benefits and job projections were insufficient, and lack of evidence that impact extends beyond client services to affect the field broadly.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaOct 2024Dismissed
Petroleum engineer proposing educational technology startup for energy workforce sought EB-2 NIW classification. AAO held endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance under Dhanasar because petitioner failed to demonstrate prospective impact beyond direct students or how platform would broadly influence field.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalOct 2024Dismissed
Clinical dentist seeks NIW based on proposed dental training platform. AAO affirmed director's finding that proposed endeavor lacked substantial merit and national importance, as evidence did not demonstrate impact commensurate with national level despite acknowledged oral health challenges.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaOct 2024Dismissed
A research economist and professor sought EB-2 classification with NIW. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional but failed to establish national importance. Research on equity and low-income communities lacked evidence of prospective impact beyond personal employer.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalOct 2024Dismissed
Dentist with advanced degree seeking NIW for clinical dental services, education, and public health outreach. AAO dismissed appeal, finding substantial merit but no national importance; proposed impact limited to direct patients and employer without broader field or industry influence.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementOct 2024Dismissed
A business consultant with master's degree seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver to consult small and medium-sized Latino-owned businesses. AAO held the specific endeavor lacks national importance because evidence addresses industry importance, not the proposed business consulting's broader field impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsOct 2024Dismissed
Financial manager and lawyer seeks NIW. AAO found petitioner impermissibly changed proposed endeavor between initial filing and RFE response; initial endeavor lacks specific focus and does not demonstrate substantial merit or national importance.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIOct 2024Dismissed
Information technology professional proposed to establish an IT services company and sought EB-2 national interest waiver under Dhanasar. AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks evidence of national importance or prospective economic impact at required level.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1APhysics and astronomyOct 2024Dismissed
An astrophysicist seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The petitioner claimed multiple criteria. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner met at least three initial criteria but failed the final merits determination, lacking sustained national or international acclaim and not ranking among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
2 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWSoftware engineeringOct 2024Dismissed
Information technology entrepreneur proposing work safety software company sought EB-2 NIW classification. AAO held endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar because petitioner failed to demonstrate how one company operation would impact field broadly or produce substantial economic effects at regional or national level.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaOct 2024Dismissed
Linguistics researcher with advanced degree sought NIW under Dhanasar framework. AAO found research endeavor nationally important but dismissed because petitioner not well-positioned to advance it; limited citations and lack of institutional support insufficient; prong three not reached.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsOct 2024Dismissed
A pole fitness performer claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A, meeting awards criterion initially but failing at final merits. The AAO withdrew the awards finding, determining competitions lacked national recognition and that the performer failed to demonstrate sustained acclaim or placement among the very top in her field.
0 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWElectrical and electronic engineeringOct 2024Dismissed
An electrical engineer and project manager in renewable energy seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO held the specific endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar because evidence addresses professional credentials and industry significance, not the proposed endeavor's broader national impact or demonstrated employment potential.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWData science and analyticsOct 2024Dismissed
Data analyst sought NIW claiming proposed endeavor in predictive analytics with vague research spanning fraud detection, healthcare, cybersecurity, and other areas. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner failed to articulate specific endeavor clearly or demonstrate national importance. Nebulous future research plans insufficient.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementOct 2024Dismissed
Advanced degree holder and entrepreneur seeking NIW for business consulting through company providing services including blood management consulting. Established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance. Revenue projections and staffing plans insufficient; endeavor impact limited to specific clients and businesses.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsOct 2024Dismissed
A management and financial analyst sought EB-2 NIW for work as a financial analyst and starting a financial advisory services business. The AAO dismissed the appeal, upholding the director's decision that motion requirements were not met and that a business plan alone insufficient to establish national importance.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementOct 2024Dismissed
HR and organizational development consultant with advanced degree sought NIW as EB-2 professional. AAO dismissed, finding field importance does not establish national importance of specific proposed endeavor; petitioner presented new evidence on appeal but failed to demonstrate prospective impact beyond prospective clients.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherOct 2024Dismissed
A petitioner sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the required employee-specific labor certification sections were not submitted and the petitioner did not contest the director's finding on the underlying EB-2 classification, so the waiver arguments were not reached.
0 of 3 criteria metRead →
