Published AAO appeal decisions

AI robotics entrepreneur claims EB-2 exceptional ability. Petitioner meets advanced degree criterion but fails to meet three of six exceptional ability criteria required for classification. Bachelor's degree in aeronautics not demonstrated to relate to robotics endeavor. Comparable evidence for remaining criteria insufficient. Categorical ineligibility established; NIW not reached.

A contemporary oil painter claimed seven criteria; service center found four met. AAO affirmed denial, concluding the petitioner's exhibitions lacked prestige evidence, judging was preliminary-level only, and achievements did not distinguish him from peers or demonstrate sustained acclaim or top-tier status.

Graduate research assistant in cybersecurity sought EB-2 with NIW for autonomous vehicle security research. AAO found substantial merit but dismissed because petitioner failed to establish national importance of specific proposed endeavor or demonstrate being well-positioned to advance it under Dhanasar framework.

Plant scientist in agronomy seeks EB-1A classification. Petitioner claimed five criteria including judging and scholarly articles already found met by SCOPS. AAO held original contributions lacked evidence of major field significance and leading role unsupported, leaving only two criteria met when three required.

Supply chain consultant with advanced degree sought EB-2 classification and NIW. Petitioner claimed substantial merit and national importance of proposed supply chain consulting business. AAO agreed substantial merit established but found record did not demonstrate national importance; business impact limited to individual clients without broader economic or field-wide implications.

Aircraft maintenance technician sought EB-2 NIW classification. Petitioner claimed exceptional ability but lacked degree of expertise significantly above ordinary in the field. Proposed endeavor for aircraft repair facility and predictive maintenance technologies lacked evidence of national importance under Dhanasar framework; impact limited to local business.

Transportation inspector identified critical design flaw in helicopter system affecting 1000 worldwide units; seeks EB-2 NIW as technical consultant or instructor. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to establish national importance by not clarifying proposed endeavor implementation, employment potential, or demonstrating how specific prospective work would have broader national implications.

Associate attorney holding advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW for continued practice in cross-border tax law and foreign investment facilitation. SCOPS granted advanced degree qualification but denied waiver. AAO affirmed: petitioner's field and experience are material to second prong but immaterial to first prong; specific endeavor lacks evidence of broader implications, job creation, or substantial economic effects constituting national importance. Appeal dismissed.

Entrepreneur with thirty-five years in mining sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed, finding while substantial merit was established, the proposed mining services endeavor lacked national importance. Evidence showed intent to serve clients and expand geographically, but failed to demonstrate prospective impact sufficient to rise to national importance level.

Civil engineer seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver claims he will develop hydrologic and hydraulic models to forecast flooding impacts. AAO held he did not establish national importance of the specific proposed endeavor, as it showed no control over projects or implications beyond his employer; not well-positioned to advance it; appeal dismissed.

Transportation engineer with PhD in civil engineering claims national interest waiver for EB-2 advanced degree category. Proposed work involves predicting traffic accidents and implementing solutions. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit but lacks sufficient evidence of national importance and prospective impact; importance of the industry alone does not establish national importance of the specific endeavor.

Art history professor and researcher claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A. Met three initial criteria: published material, judging, and scholarly articles. AAO dismissed on final merits, finding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

AI algorithm developer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for U.S. work. SCOPS found substantial merit and national importance but concluded insufficient evidence of qualification to advance endeavor and that waiver would benefit U.S. AAO remanded because petitioner's employment circumstances changed materially since filing; clarification needed on how endeavor will be pursued.

Industrial engineer with Ph.D. seeking EB-2 NIW for developing advanced three-dimensional AI chips. Qualified for underlying EB-2 but failed first Dhanasar prong: proposed endeavor lacks demonstrated substantial merit and national importance. AAO affirmed denial without reaching remaining prongs.

Graphic designer seeks NIW classification. Proposed multiple inconsistent endeavors including consulting, training, nonprofit work, and design roles. AAO found petitioner shifted plans and failed to provide consistent, coherent, specific description supported by independent evidence. Appeal dismissed.

Chemical engineering graduate student seeks NIW for research designing materials for PFAS water purification. AAO found first prong met but rejected second prong, concluding citations and publications alone insufficient to show field influence and well-positioning.

A cloud engineer sought extraordinary ability classification through five criteria. The AAO affirmed that she met only two criteria (judging and scholarly articles), did not meet the threshold of three required criteria, and lacked demonstrated sustained acclaim for the elite classification.

An investment officer in the financial industry sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming awards, published material, leading roles, high pay and original contributions. The AAO withdrew the awards finding because only company awards were shown, left three criteria met, then dismissed the appeal for lack of sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.

The petitioner is a chief executive and co-founder of a food technology company who sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming eight criteria. The service center accepted two, and he contested six on appeal. The AAO dismissed because he did not satisfy three criteria, and it did not reach the final merits.

A life sciences and digital solutions executive met three initial EB-1A criteria but failed the final merits determination. The AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or career of acclaimed work to demonstrate extraordinary ability in the field.

An internal medicine resident with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW for interventional cardiology research. The AAO found the proposed research had substantial merit and national importance under the first Dhanasar prong. However, the second prong failed because letters of support lacked specific examples of how the petitioner's work affected clinical practice or demonstrated sufficient success warranting waiver of labor certification.

A public diplomacy professional claimed seven extraordinary ability criteria but met only membership. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding petitioner satisfied only one initial criterion and did not reach final merits, as threshold requirements were not met.

Commercial bank manager with 30 years experience sought EB-2 NIW classification under Dhanasar framework. AAO affirmed that proposed endeavor, though substantially meritorious, lacked national importance. Evidence showed company sales projections and job creation at 16 employees but failed to demonstrate substantial positive economic effects at national level required by Dhanasar.

Advanced degree professional in aviation safety sought NIW for endeavor providing safety training and consultancy to airlines. AAO found no demonstrated national importance: articles on aviation safety importance insufficient; petitioner failed to show specific endeavor methods would have national implications or create substantial U.S. economic impact. Appeal dismissed.

Management analyst with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver for endeavor improving financial services in underserved areas. AAO found substantial merit but insufficient national importance; impact was not shown to extend broadly to industry level, so dismissed the appeal.