Published AAO appeal decisions

A software engineer seeks EB-2 with national interest waiver to develop a secure video conferencing platform with AI-assisted features. He claimed the endeavor would drive economic growth and innovation but provided no evidence of national importance or broader industry impact. The AAO affirmed dismissal of the appeal.

A digital marketing business consultant and entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO disagreed with the service center that three criteria were met, finding none of the first five satisfied, and declined to reach the sixth, the final merits, or the Dhanasar framework.

A CEO of a healthcare consulting firm sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO found her proposed endeavor addressing rural healthcare access lacked national importance because she did not demonstrate how it would impact her field broadly beyond individual clients, and past achievements do not establish endeavor importance under Dhanasar.

Cybersecurity specialist seeks NIW to establish consulting company as CEO. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of proposed endeavor, lacking evidence the company would operate at scale or have broader implications for cybersecurity industry despite cybersecurity being government priority.

A communications professional seeking EB-2 classification with national interest waiver claimed she would establish a marketing company as CEO. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding her proposed endeavor would serve only direct clients without demonstrating broader implications or substantial national economic effects required for national importance.

Civil engineer with doctoral research on sustainable construction materials claimed an NIW. AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, and the petitioner was well-positioned to advance it, but rejected the waiver because evidence did not establish the national interest was sufficiently urgent to bypass labor certification.

Bacteriologist and clinical analyst claimed an NIW for consulting and entrepreneurial work in healthcare. AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance because it was limited to one company's clients and evidence did not show government interest, funding, or broad sectoral implications.

An early childhood and special education teacher sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability, plus a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding that the membership and recognition criteria were not met and that expertise significantly above the norm was not shown, and reserved the waiver question.

Human resources management consultant proposed consulting business targeting oil and gas sector. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance; evidence emphasized industry importance rather than specific impact of proposed endeavor beyond unidentified clients.

Construction manager and entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW classification. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner did not establish exceptional ability or meet sufficient evidentiary criteria. National interest waiver issue not addressed because petitioner ineligible for underlying classification.

Hospitalist physician with medical degree and research expertise in vascular diseases sought NIW for clinical research on peripheral arterial disease. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, petitioner well positioned to advance it, and waiver beneficial to United States.

An assistant professor of criminology seeking EB-2 with NIW to conduct research on combating human trafficking claimed substantial merit and national importance. The AAO found substantial merit but insufficient evidence that the specific research endeavor would impact national response to trafficking at the required level.

A social and community service manager and entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to establish that her proposed endeavor had national importance under Dhanasar's first prong, focusing on broader prospective impact rather than industry or profession importance.

Paralegal seeks EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner did not establish exceptional ability, meeting only two of six required criteria. Failure to qualify for underlying EB-2 classification rendered NIW analysis unnecessary.

Data scientist seeking NIW for EB-2 classification. AAO affirmed dismissal because proposed endeavor lacks national importance; while substantial merit established, petitioner's work benefits only current employer with no demonstration of innovations or impact extending beyond employer's business interests or clients.

An engineer with a master's degree sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for research on enhancing concrete strength using wastewater byproducts. The AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance: it remains confined to a single employer with no demonstrated broader implications for the field or nation.

Contact center entrepreneur seeks NIW to operate call center service provider. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner did not establish national importance of proposed endeavor. While services may benefit government clients, they lack innovation or evidence of broader industry impact or economic significance beyond company and direct clients.

Neuroscience researcher with Ph.D. seeks EB-2 self-petition with NIW for research on Alzheimer's and ataxia mechanisms using stem cells. AAO found all three Dhanasar prongs met: research has national importance with broader implications, petitioner well-positioned with advanced degree and track record, and waiver benefits U.S. given urgent medical need.

A telecommunications CEO and entrepreneur sought an EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver, planning a company to deploy telecom infrastructure in rural and underserved areas. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the endeavor's benefits were too attenuated to show national importance, and it did not reach the other prongs.

An attorney with advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW for providing international law consulting in foreign investment and trade. The AAO found the endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance as it would not sufficiently extend beyond the petitioner's clients to impact the field or economy broadly, thus failing the first Dhanasar prong.

Musician and teacher with advanced degree claimed an NIW for music education and cultural projects. AAO rejected the waiver because the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; teaching music individually, without demonstrated broad economic or sectoral impact, does not meet Dhanasar's threshold.

Electrical engineer proposing specialized consulting company seeking EB-2 with NIW. AAO affirmed underlying EB-2 eligibility but dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite focus on modernization and sustainability.

A biomedical researcher with a PhD in immunology sought EB-2 NIW classification for research on genome and protein engineering. The AAO agreed he met EB-2 requirements but found his specific proposed endeavor lacked national importance despite involving critical emerging technologies, as expert letters discussed his field generally, not his particular research.

A petitioner seeks EB-2 NIW to operate a Florida-based financial literacy education company for K-12 schools. Petitioner established advanced degree eligibility but failed to demonstrate national importance despite general significance of financial education field and modest projected job creation.

Mathematics teacher seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Petitioner claimed her work addresses STEM teacher shortages and supports educational priorities. AAO found the specific proposed endeavor lacks national importance because its impact remains confined to her students and employer, not extending to the education field broadly.