Published AAO appeal decisions

Television director in noncommercial television claimed extraordinary ability under seven criteria including major awards, PGA membership, and original contributions. AAO found petitioner did not receive major internationally recognized award and PGA membership did not meet criterion. Evidence insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at very top of field.

Traditional medicine practitioner claimed extraordinary ability but failed to show sustained national or international acclaim. AAO found no major awards, publications in major media, or evidence of judging. Misuse of physician titles and credentials raised questions about prospective benefit, warranting dismissal.

Comic book author claimed extraordinary ability but failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim. AAO found local awards, inappropriate association membership, and limited-circulation publications insufficient. Evidence did not show petitioner at very top of field.

Self-represented petitioner claimed extraordinary ability but failed to meet award and membership criteria. Awards lacked substantiation and were received over a decade before filing, failing to establish sustained acclaim. No evidence of three regulatory criteria met.

An arts petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The service center denied for failure to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or meet three regulatory criteria. The AAO summarily dismissed the appeal because petitioner failed to identify specific erroneous conclusions of law or fact, despite counsel's promise to submit a brief.

Trampoline and acrobatics competitor claimed extraordinary ability based on youth-level awards. AAO found awards limited to junior competitions and lacked national or international standing. Evidence insufficient to show sustained acclaim at very top of field.

Business professional claimed extraordinary ability in business through awards and membership criteria. AAO found NBIA Incubator Innovation Award insufficient due to limited scope and newness, membership criterion unmet, and overall evidence failing to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top.

A self-petitioner dance instructor claimed extraordinary ability through awards, membership, and published material. The AAO found awards from youth events insufficient, membership requirements did not reflect outstanding achievement, and published material lacked proper documentation. Overall evidence did not demonstrate top-level sustained acclaim.

A gymnastics competitor and coach sought EB-1A classification. The petitioner was denied because she could not establish sustained national or international acclaim. Her athletic achievements ended in 1999, and her coaching record—with athletes placing fifth—did not evidence top-tier expertise. At least three criteria were unmet.

Kickboxer sought EB-1A classification. Petitioner claimed awards and association membership criteria. AAO rejected awards as insufficiently recent or nationally recognized, and found association membership did not require outstanding achievement. Overall evidence insufficient to show extraordinary ability.

A self-represented athlete sought EB-1A classification and was denied for lack of sustained acclaim. The appeal form requested time to translate documents and promised more evidence, but nothing arrived after eleven months. Because no specific error of law or fact was identified, the AAO summarily dismissed the appeal without analyzing criteria.

A business professional sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The director denied for lack of sustained acclaim. On appeal, counsel offered only general assertions of extraordinary ability and abuse of discretion, promised a brief that never arrived, and the AAO summarily dismissed because no specific error was identified. No criteria were analyzed.

A Georgian folk singer and choirmaster self-petitioner claimed EB-1A extraordinary ability in the arts. He asserted five criteria: awards, membership, judging, original contributions, and high salary. The AAO found none met and concluded his work with Ensemble Kutaisi, while moderately successful, did not establish top-level sustained acclaim.

An opera singer petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability. She submitted evidence of a Thierry Mermod Prize and student competition awards. The AAO found the major award did not constitute major international recognition and student competition awards do not evidence top-level acclaim, dismissing the appeal.

A pianist applied for EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. She claimed three criteria: lesser awards, membership, and published material. The AAO found each criterion not met and concluded the evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of music performance.

A swimmer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability in athletics. The AAO found the petitioner met the membership criterion via Russian national team participation but withdrew director's finding on awards after noting post-filing awards were ineligible. Overall, evidence of moderate success did not establish sustained international acclaim at the very top, dismissing the appeal.

An EB-1A petitioner of unstated occupation was denied because the director found no supporting documentation was submitted. On appeal, counsel said evidence had been filed, and the record confirmed an earlier submission. The AAO withdrew the denial and remanded for a full merits adjudication, without analyzing any criteria.

A self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification in athletics. The AAO found that counsel never specified which regulatory criteria were met, analyzed the most applicable evidence under awards criterion, and concluded neither the scholarship nor collegiate awards demonstrated sustained acclaim at the very top, dismissing the appeal.

A gastroenterologist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability in the sciences. The AAO upheld the director's finding that the petitioner failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim at the very top, finding academic awards and a single video presentation insufficient, and dismissing the appeal.

Competitive shooter and shooting instructor claiming extraordinary ability in athletics. Petitioner presented awards from competitive shooting career but no evidence of sustained acclaim or student awards during six years preceding petition. AAO held prior competitive achievements insufficient without evidence of sustained excellence or teaching at highest levels.

Architect and web designer claiming extraordinary ability in arts and design. Petitioner claimed meeting criteria for awards and published material based on work inclusion in design publications and books. AAO rejected awards claim and published material claim, finding neither establishment of nationally recognized prizes nor publications about petitioner; aggregate evidence insufficient.

A scientist in psychophysiology self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability. She claimed four regulatory criteria but the AAO found she did not meet the awards or membership criteria, and letters of recommendation alone could not establish leading role. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of her field.

A young model claimed extraordinary ability through youth modeling competitions and newspaper features. The AAO found amateur awards at age fourteen do not indicate top-level achievement and newspaper coverage focused on career concerns rather than acclaim. Appeal dismissed for insufficient evidence of sustained extraordinary ability.

An arts professional sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification, and the director denied the petition for lack of sustained acclaim. On appeal, counsel said only that the evidence was undervalued and promised a brief that never came. The AAO summarily dismissed the appeal because no specific error was identified.

Basketball player with prior acclaim seeks EB-1A as coach. Decision holds petitioner demonstrated extraordinary ability as athlete but failed to show coaching is within area of expertise. Limited coaching experience (three months middle school, camp lectures) insufficient for sustained national or international acclaim in coaching, even considering overall pattern.