AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
6 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-1ALife sciences and medicine2008Dismissed
HIV/AIDS researcher filed self-petition claiming extraordinary ability. Petitioner claimed awards, membership, and published material criteria. AAO found petitioner met only one criterion; three required. Appeal dismissed because petitioner failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim at top level.
0 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-1ALife sciences and medicine2008Dismissed
Biomedical researcher in sciences claimed extraordinary ability based on grants, memberships, contributions, and publications. AAO affirmed denial despite finding two criteria met, holding that meeting multiple criteria alone does not establish sustained national or international acclaim required for top of field.
2 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1ALife sciences and medicine2008Dismissed
A research scientist in the sciences sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. She claimed to meet awards, membership, and published material criteria through a pending patent, research grants, professional association membership, and citations to her work. The AAO found none of the criteria satisfied because the evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at the very top level required.
0 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-1ALife sciences and medicine2008Dismissed
Research scientist in osteoblast development claimed extraordinary ability in sciences. AAO found plenary poster presentations insufficient as awards, membership criterion unmet, and publication insufficient for sustained national acclaim. Evidence showed talent but not top-tier achievement.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ALife sciences and medicine2008Dismissed
Pharmacology researcher sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner claimed fellowships and professional memberships. AAO found fellowships designed for early-career researchers lack prestige, memberships either post-dated petition or lacked stringent requirements, and evidence insufficient to show top-field distinction.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ALife sciences and medicine2008Dismissed
Phlebology professional claiming extraordinary ability in sciences. Petitioner submitted evidence of awards, membership, and published material. AAO found awards lacked national or international recognition, membership did not meet regulatory requirements, and published materials were not primarily about the petitioner. Petition denied.
0 of 4 criteria metRead →
