Published AAO appeal decisions

An exercise and sport psychology professional filed self-petition seeking EB-1A classification. Director found two criteria met. Petitioner contested three other criteria on appeal but failed to establish three criteria minimum. AAO affirmed dismissal; petitioner not demonstrated to be at very top of field.

Self-petitioner in athletics (equestrian performer) claimed two criteria only. Director found failure on both original contributions and critical role criteria. Appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify erroneous conclusions of law or fact.

Karate practitioner and coach filed self-petition claiming extraordinary ability through competition victory and four regulatory criteria. The AAO found the competition award was not major or internationally recognized, and the petitioner met none of the ten regulatory criteria. Petition dismissed because petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained acclaim or top-tier field status.

Wushu athlete and instructor petitioner failed to specifically address director's findings on appeal, merely reasserting achievements without responding to deficiencies. Director rejected awards, membership, publications, exhibitions, and leading role criteria. AAO dismissed appeal summarily for failure to identify erroneous conclusions and rejected combining athletic and coaching accomplishments as impermissible.

Self-petitioner seeks EB-1A as synchronized swimmer. Lacks sustained acclaim post-2003 and clear evidence of continuing in area of extraordinary ability. AAO found achievements not significantly above others in field and no credible intent to continue work in expertise area in United States.

Ballroom dancer claimed EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO found only one criterion met and rejected claims about one-time achievement and additional criteria. Dismissed appeal, holding evidence insufficient to demonstrate sustained acclaim at the field's very top.

Martial arts instructor claims extraordinary ability. Presented old awards, association membership, and leading role at organization. AAO found one criterion met but awards too old to show sustained acclaim, membership inadequate, and overall evidence insufficient for sustained national or international acclaim at very top. Appeal dismissed.

Self-represented athlete with multiple claimed fields (running, wrestling) sought extraordinary ability classification. AAO found no established primary field of endeavor, no documented prizes, and no evidence of sustained acclaim or critical role in any field.

A wrestler sought extraordinary ability classification. The AAO reviewed six criteria but found no evidence supporting any. Petitioner submitted no documentation of awards, membership, publications, or leadership roles. Evidence failed to demonstrate sustained national acclaim or that petitioner stood among the very top in the field.

Athletic coach sought extraordinary ability classification. Met two criteria (awards and leading role) but needed three. AAO rejected argument that same evidence satisfies membership criterion separately, finding petitioner lacked sustained national or international acclaim at coaching's very top level.

Jockey claimed extraordinary ability in athletics through awards, published materials, and critical role. AAO affirmed denial, finding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim at the very top level of the profession.

A gymnastics competitor and coach sought EB-1A classification. The petitioner was denied because she could not establish sustained national or international acclaim. Her athletic achievements ended in 1999, and her coaching record—with athletes placing fifth—did not evidence top-tier expertise. At least three criteria were unmet.

Basketball player with prior acclaim seeks EB-1A as coach. Decision holds petitioner demonstrated extraordinary ability as athlete but failed to show coaching is within area of expertise. Limited coaching experience (three months middle school, camp lectures) insufficient for sustained national or international acclaim in coaching, even considering overall pattern.

Head horse trainer and jumper petitioner claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A. AAO held petitioner failed to meet three regulatory criteria through objective evidence and instead relied excessively on expert letters. Achievements did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at very top level. Appeal dismissed.

A boxing trainer and coach in Turkey seeking EB-1A athletic extraordinary ability provided no evidence of national or international acclaim or ongoing work after 1986. The AAO found he failed to meet three required criteria and dismissed the appeal for lack of sustained acclaim.

A power lifter from Uruguay seeks EB-1A classification as a personal trainer. The petitioner claimed awards, membership, published material, judging, and leading role. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the petitioner met none of the three criteria required and showed no sustained national or international acclaim in the claimed field.

A tennis player turned junior coach sought EB-1A classification in athletics, claiming acclaim earned as a Soviet player and carried into coaching. The AAO held that honors lacked certified translations or recognition, team membership did not suffice, and past acclaim was not sustained through coaching, so the appeal was dismissed.

Rhythmic gymnastics coach sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner claimed three criteria via Master of Sport designation, judging, and leading role in team success. AAO found insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim as coach and dismissed the appeal.

A power lifter from Uruguay seeking EB-1A classification claimed extraordinary ability through awards, judging, and organizational roles. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding only one criterion met and rejecting claims of leading role and sustained acclaim as personal trainer.

Self-represented former athlete petitioner claimed extraordinary ability through past athletic achievements and subsequent business and ministry work. AAO found petitioner was accomplished athlete but lacked sustained national or international acclaim placing him at the very top of his field. Appeal dismissed.

A former athlete and sports consultant claimed extraordinary ability through awards, original contributions, scholarly articles, and leading critical role. The AAO found that past athletic accomplishments and subsequent business work failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.

Former competitive rhythmic gymnast and coach sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Service center denied for lack of sustained acclaim. AAO affirmed, finding career as athlete ended 1998 and coaching achievements insufficient: no major awards, published materials not about beneficiary, no evidence of plans to continue work in the United States.

A rhythmic gymnastics coach sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The petitioner claimed Master of Sport designation and judging participation as evidence. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the coach failed to meet at least three required criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim as a coach rather than athlete.