Published AAO appeal decisions

Cryptography researcher pursuing PhD seeks EB-2 advanced degree and NIW for research developing secure communication and privacy tools. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance. However, petitioner lacks documented postdoctoral position or specific employment commitment, failing to establish he is well-positioned to advance the work.

Computer science Ph.D. candidate proposed research in AI-enhanced network performance. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but rejected petition because petitioner lacks sufficient record of research success or progress to be well positioned to advance the work.

A researcher in wireless charging technology for smartphones sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner established substantial merit and was well-positioned to advance the endeavor, but failed to demonstrate national importance. Letters lacked corroboration and specific evidence of broader impact on industry, economy, or national security.

A designer and entrepreneur seeks EB-2 national interest waiver for AI-powered user experience and smart footwear technology. The AAO dismissed because although the endeavor has substantial merit in technology and business, the petitioner failed to establish its national importance, presenting vague claims across multiple industries without sufficient focused prospective impact.

Graduate student researcher in artificial intelligence claimed exceptional ability and national interest waiver. Service center denied without analyzing national importance or waiver discretion. AAO remanded for complete Dhanasar analysis, finding service center misidentified the proposed endeavor and failed to assess specificity and prospective impact.

Engineering graduate student self-petitioner sought NIW for AI research using linguistics and game theory. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked specific details and documented prospective impact required to establish national importance under Dhanasar first prong.

Information technology researcher with advanced degree sought NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor has national importance but petitioner lacks relevant expertise, clear research plan, and demonstrated funding success needed to be well-positioned to advance it.

Graduate research assistant in cybersecurity self-petitions for EB-2 NIW. Proposes autonomous vehicle security research with substantial merit and national importance. AAO finds insufficient evidence of deployment impact, citation comparisons, or progress rendering her well positioned to advance the endeavor.

Ph.D. student in computer science with research focus on human-machine interfaces and AI sought EB-2 with NIW. AAO reversed service center on prong one, finding national importance established, but affirmed dismissal after finding petitioner not well positioned to advance endeavor.

Researcher in cybersecurity sought NIW under EB-2. AAO found his proposed AI-based research had national importance but dismissed because he lacked sufficient record of success and feasible plan demonstrating he could advance it as described in academic or industrial environment.

Computer science researcher seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver claimed substantial merit, national importance, and ability to advance research independently. AAO found the first prong met but dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate he was well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.

A telecommunications researcher with doctorate proposed advancing machine learning and deep learning research under EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO found her endeavor met national importance but dismissed appeal because publications, nominal peer reliance, and limited demonstrated funding responsibility failed to show she was well positioned to advance it.

A research scientist with a PhD in computer science sought EB-2 NIW for AI research in multimodal machine learning. SCOPS denied NIW but approved advanced degree qualification. The AAO reversed, finding all three Dhanasar prongs met: substantial merit and national importance in AI, petitioner well-positioned, and waiver balances beneficially for the United States.

An advanced degree professional in a STEM field proposes an endeavor with substantial merit and national importance. The AAO remanded because the service center improperly analyzed whether the petitioner is well-positioned to advance the endeavor and failed to adequately explain the balance-of-benefits analysis under Dhanasar.

Research scientist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for developing artificial intelligence technologies. Decision found proposed endeavor lacks sufficient detail and evidence to establish prospective national importance. Appeal dismissed on first prong failure.

AI researcher sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for research on information retrieval and natural language processing. SCOPS initially approved then revoked. AAO sustained appeal, finding petitioner established national importance of endeavor, demonstrated requisite expertise, and proved waiver would benefit the United States.

AI researcher seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver claimed substantial merit, national importance, positioning to advance, and balance favoring waiver under Dhanasar. AAO found first prong met but rejected second and third prongs: petitioner lacks completed degree, secured funding, or concrete employment plans; waiver not shown beneficial to United States.

A cybersecurity specialist seeks NIW as an EB-2 advanced degree professional. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner did not possess an advanced degree at filing and the proposed endeavor—personal career advancement—lacks the national importance required under the first Dhanasar prong.

Senior cloud security architect petitioned for EB-2 NIW by technology company. Petitioner claimed research on AI-driven cybersecurity architectures. AAO found substantial merit but insufficient specificity and no demonstrated national importance beyond employer and clients. Appeal dismissed.

An employer petitions for software engineer beneficiary for EB-2 NIW classification. SCOPS erred by analyzing prior work rather than proposed endeavor, and failed to apply STEM field guidance. AAO withdrew SCOPS decision and remanded for proper analysis of all three Dhanasar prongs with appropriate consideration of software engineering innovation.

Computer scientist researching AI applications in healthcare sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Proposed work on multimodal AI systems addressing healthcare transparency. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance with global implications, applicant well positioned via expertise and prior government-funded research, and waiver beneficial to U.S. on balance given national security and competitiveness implications.

Cloud software developer with master's degree in computer engineering seeking EB-2 advanced degree professional status with national interest waiver for machine learning research. AAO reversed service center on first prong but dismissed appeal because petitioner lacks sufficient track record and advancement capability beyond educational credentials alone.

Senior engineer in AI research seeking NIW under Dhanasar framework for continued research on safe, autonomous AI systems. Service center's denial lacked complete analysis of evidence, made contradictory statements, and failed to address all arguments. Remanded for proper application of all three Dhanasar prongs with complete evidentiary analysis.

Research scientist with master's degree in electrical and computer engineering proposed to advance privacy-preserving IoT technology. AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but concluded petitioner lacks concrete steps toward employment or demonstrated feasibility, failing the second Dhanasar prong.

A computer scientist proposed developing machine learning algorithms for precision medicine and drug discovery. Although the AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, it affirmed the service center's finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance the research, lacking comparable evidence to established precedent.