Published AAO appeal decisions

Legal consultant in alternative dispute resolution sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Proposed establishing consultancy for ADR and public bond investment. AAO dismissed, finding the specific endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance; petitioner confused field importance with endeavor-specific impact and failed to show broader implications.

An attorney with advanced degrees seeks NIW to develop AI legal technology. AAO dismissed appeal, holding that while industry importance aligns with government priorities, petitioner failed demonstrating specific proposed endeavor's prospective impact at national importance level required by Dhanasar.

Occupational health professional appealed NIW denial under Dhanasar framework. AAO affirmed that while proposed endeavor had substantial merit, petitioner failed to establish its national importance. Consulting business lacked sufficiently specific prospective national impact and significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial economic effects. Appeal dismissed.

Attorney specializing in intellectual property and cybercrime seeking EB-2 NIW proposed consulting business with claimed job creation and tax benefits. AAO dismissed, finding endeavor lacks sufficient national importance and evidence does not demonstrate broader impact on field beyond specific business and clients.

Conflict resolution consultant with master's degree in global development and peace seeks NIW. AAO dismissed appeal because proposed endeavor, though with substantial merit, lacks sufficient evidence of broader field impact and qualitative significance required for national importance under Dhanasar.

Brazilian-trained attorney sought NIW for family law mediation practice in Delaware. Qualified for underlying EB-2 advanced degree classification. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner failed to show proposed endeavor has national importance, lacking evidence of broader impact beyond local services or how foreign law expertise benefits U.S. practice.

Lawyer seeking EB-2 advanced degree classification and national interest waiver to establish legal consultancy for sustainable energy. Claimed substantial merit and national importance for Center for Legal Innovation in Sustainable Energy but failed to demonstrate national importance or specific improvements over existing initiatives. AAO dismissed appeal; first and third prongs not established.

Senior legal advisor with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Service center denied without analyzing evidence against Dhanasar framework. AAO remanded because service center failed to discuss evidence, identify insufficiencies, or explain conclusions for any of the three prongs required for meaningful appellate review.

A lawyer and legal entrepreneur in self-petitioner status sought EB-2 with NIW. The applicant claimed substantial merit and national importance for a legal practice advising startups and cybersecurity. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance: the business plan lacked specificity about economic impact, job creation, or projected benefits; merely working in an important field is insufficient.

Advanced degree professional in human trafficking prevention seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance of specific proposed endeavor. While human trafficking prevention is federally recognized as priority, petitioner's individual work lacks evidence of prospective national or global impact beyond immediate clients. Appeal dismissed.

Military chaplain with advanced degree sought NIW for proposed endeavor addressing servicemember suicide and extremism. AAO affirmed dismissal because the endeavor lacks national importance; impact confined to individuals receiving services, not the broader field or national interest.

Researcher, teacher, and policy adviser sought EB-2 advanced degree classification and NIW. AAO reversed director on national importance prong but affirmed denial on second prong: published research does not prove petitioner well positioned to advance the specific proposed endeavor without additional evidence of progress or success.

An attorney sought EB-2 NIW for a proposed mediation and conciliation company. The AAO affirmed dismissal of motions to reopen, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial merit and national importance of her specific endeavor, and that she was not well-positioned to advance it beyond industry-wide importance.

A manager and lawyer sought national interest waiver for immigration consulting business. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance and the petitioner was not well positioned to advance it, lacking immigration law credentials and prior business ownership experience.

A social protection specialist sought NIW for EB-2 classification based on international development work in Egypt and Yemen. Petitioner claimed substantial merit and national importance of social protection initiatives, positioning to advance them, and that waiver benefits the US. AAO sustained appeal, finding all three Dhanasar prongs satisfied.

Minister in community development sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal as abandoned for failure to respond to RFE. Alternatively, held petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability and did not meet any prong of the Dhanasar national interest waiver framework.