Published AAO appeal decisions

Physician sought EB-2 with national interest waiver to practice geriatric medicine. AAO affirmed denial on two grounds. Petitioner failed to show national importance of general practice and did not demonstrate being well-positioned to advance the endeavor. Material amendment concerning clinic ownership was impermissible.

An electrical engineer sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for a self-employed consultancy in oil and gas. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding the engineer's expertise and work, while valuable, lacked evidence of national importance, broader field implications, or substantial economic benefit required by Dhanasar.

A consultant with advanced degree seeking EB-2 with NIW demonstrated EB-2 eligibility but failed NIW requirements. The AAO upheld dismissal: the consulting endeavor lacked national importance, and the petitioner's expertise, though qualified, did not exceed ordinary field level.

A doctoral student in business research sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO found the proposed organizational behavior research endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, but the applicant lacked sufficient education, publication record, and demonstrated success to show he was well-positioned to advance it. Appeal dismissed.

A speech-language pathologist with a master's degree sought EB-2 NIW, proposing research in speech pathology. The AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but rejected the petition because the petitioner failed to establish she was well-positioned to advance it; her publications lacked citations, letters came largely from associates, and evidence did not demonstrate sufficient research success or industry interest.

A business administrator seeking EB-2 with NIW claimed national importance based on past professional achievements and a self-developed "Triad of Value" method. The AAO found the petitioner misunderstood Dhanasar: the first prong focuses on the proposed endeavor's prospective impact, not the petitioner's execution or prior success.

A civil engineer sought EB-2 advanced degree classification with NIW. The AAO accepted advanced degree eligibility but dismissed the petition because the petitioner failed to consistently articulate a single, well-defined proposed endeavor, preventing meaningful analysis of its merit, national importance, or positioning.

A distance education specialist sought EB-2 and NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding substantial merit but no national importance. The proposed endeavor impacts only individual students or clients, not the broader field. Applicant also lacks U.S. market knowledge and independent consulting experience.

Entrepreneur seeking EB-2 with NIW for consulting services. AAO held petitioner lacks both advanced degree equivalency and substantive national importance for proposed endeavor; consulting services limited to small clientele without broader economic impact. Appeal dismissed.

Quantitative analytics researcher with Ph.D. in economics sought EB-2 national interest waiver to develop novel mathematical models for economic forecasting. AAO found substantial merit and national importance but concluded she lacked sufficient record of success and demonstrated positioning to advance the endeavor, failing the second Dhanasar prong.

Construction tradesman sought NIW for occupational health and safety consulting. AAO dismissed appeal because repeated material misrepresentations about the proposed endeavor vitiated eligibility, and even setting those aside, the endeavor lacked national importance and petitioner was not well positioned to advance it.

A self-petitioner researcher in geospatial information management sought an NIW as an advanced degree professional. The AAO affirmed denial, finding she demonstrated substantial merit and was well-positioned but failed to establish the national importance of her proposed research as required by Dhanasar's first prong.

Medical scientist seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Claimed proposed endeavor to bridge Korean and U.S. medical systems had substantial merit and national importance, and that he was well positioned to advance it. AAO found the endeavor lacked specificity, techniques were not clearly identified or proven superior to existing U.S. offerings, and no demonstrated partnerships or interest from relevant institutions.

Entrepreneur with twelve years business and technology experience seeks EB-2 NIW. Claimed business development and real estate technology solutions have national importance. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite having substantial merit; low business revenue and absence of broader implications fail to demonstrate national benefit.

Dentist sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed the appeal because petitioner presented inconsistent and ambiguous descriptions of her proposed endeavor across multiple opportunities, failing to establish it sufficiently to analyze under any Dhanasar prong.

An electrical engineer with a master's degree in engineering seeks NIW for EB-2 as self-petitioner. AAO found substantial merit and national importance of his research endeavor but dismissed because he failed to show he is well positioned to advance it; his temporary Ph.D. student position, prospective postdoc role, and published work lacked demonstrated impact on field.

Environmental specialist with advanced degree proposing consulting business in environmental policy. AAO affirmed Director finding that petitioner meets first Dhanasar prong but fails second prong: insufficient evidence of ability to advance the endeavor despite academic background and professional experience.

Fitness instructor petitioner self-filed for EB-2 with NIW, proposing to establish and operate a fitness studio with online classes. AAO dismissed: the proposed endeavor lacks national importance because moving customers between facilities produces no net national effect, and petitioner did not show her specific business would meaningfully impact national health statistics compared to competitors.

A petroleum drilling engineer holding advanced-degree equivalent sought an EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed denial, finding his proposed endeavor of continuing employment in casing and cementing specialization lacked national importance. Though well positioned to advance the work, failure on the first prong precluded waiver eligibility.

An environmental scientist with a master's degree in natural resources engineering sought EB-2 NIW classification based on research in urban water management and sustainability. The AAO agreed the research had substantial merit and national importance but found she was not well-positioned to advance it independently and had not shown benefit of waiver over labor certification. Appeal dismissed.

A banker sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for financial advisory work. The AAO found the petitioner failed to establish the first Dhanasar prong by providing only vague possibilities rather than a specific, detailed endeavor with national importance, and failed the second prong.

A marketing professional with tourism and hotel management degree sought an EB-2 national interest waiver to start and manage her own tourism business. The AAO affirmed denial, finding her proposed endeavor lacked national importance because it would serve only specific clients without broader economic impact, and she was not well positioned to advance it.

A mechanical engineer sought NIW classification for research on ocean energy conversion using vortex-induced vibration. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding the proposed research had substantial merit and national importance but the petitioner failed to demonstrate he was well-positioned to advance it despite his advanced degree.

Engineer initially, later claiming sales operations consulting proposed endeavor, sought EB-2 advanced degree and NIW. AAO dismissed appeal; petitioner failed to demonstrate he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor, which also fundamentally changed from engineering to sales consulting between petition filing and appeal.

Machine learning researcher with Ph.D. seeking NIW for EB-2 classification. Proposed algorithms and system optimization research. AAO held first prong met but petitioner failed second prong; education alone insufficient; lacked evidence of significant grant leadership, documented field impact, or sustained industry interest.