Published AAO appeal decisions

Engineer self-petitioned for EB-2 national interest waiver to develop machine-learning forecasting models for renewable energy. AAO found proposed endeavor has national importance but petitioner not well positioned to advance it. Matter remanded for reconsideration after petitioner provides additional evidence of demonstrated success in similar work.

Cryptography researcher pursuing PhD seeks EB-2 advanced degree and NIW for research developing secure communication and privacy tools. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance. However, petitioner lacks documented postdoctoral position or specific employment commitment, failing to establish he is well-positioned to advance the work.

Computer science Ph.D. candidate proposed research in AI-enhanced network performance. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but rejected petition because petitioner lacks sufficient record of research success or progress to be well positioned to advance the work.

Graduate student researcher in structural engineering sought EB-2 NIW for developing sustainable concrete materials and construction methods. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, but petitioner failed second prong by lacking documented plan, progress, and stakeholder interest to advance the endeavor.

A psychology professor with Ph.D. sought EB-2 national interest waiver for research on data science and ecological threats. AAO found proposed research has substantial merit and national importance but determined petitioner lacks evidence of being well-positioned to advance endeavor; appeal dismissed.

A Ph.D. student in petroleum engineering sought NIW claiming research in energy storage advances national interest. AAO found the endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but rejected the petition because the applicant failed to show sufficient progress, citation record, or field interest to demonstrate being well-positioned to advance the proposed research.

An optical physicist with a master's degree sought NIW for research in optical sciences. The AAO found the research has substantial merit and national importance but dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate being well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.

Brazilian-trained attorney sought NIW for family law mediation practice in Delaware. Qualified for underlying EB-2 advanced degree classification. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner failed to show proposed endeavor has national importance, lacking evidence of broader impact beyond local services or how foreign law expertise benefits U.S. practice.

A rigging artist and entrepreneur in entertainment sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed dismissal because his proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite working in an important field, and he failed to demonstrate he is well positioned to advance it through education, planning, or demonstrated progress.

A mechanical engineering researcher with an advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding she was not well-positioned to advance her proposed sustainable energy research endeavor, and declining to reach the first and third prongs.

Chemical engineer with Ph.D. seeks NIW for renewable synthetic fuels research under Dhanasar framework. First prong met: proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance. Second prong failed: education alone insufficient; citations lack comparative metrics; no demonstrated record of research success at level required.

Human resources specialist seeks EB-2 NIW claiming innovative HR methodologies would benefit U.S. business landscape and job creation. AAO affirmed denial because while endeavor has substantial merit, petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance through specific prospective impact or connection to broader national implications.

A researcher in wireless charging technology for smartphones sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner established substantial merit and was well-positioned to advance the endeavor, but failed to demonstrate national importance. Letters lacked corroboration and specific evidence of broader impact on industry, economy, or national security.

A researcher with a master's degree in electrical engineering sought EB-2 NIW for research in wireless charging technology for smartphones. The AAO confirmed the advanced degree requirement and substantial merit but rejected the petition because uncorroborated expert assertions about national importance were insufficient; the technology's impact was limited to employer, licensees, and customers, not national impact.

Educator proposing nationwide framework for teacher quality and early childhood education, seeking EB-2 NIW. AAO held petitioner failed Dhanasar prong two: insufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance endeavor given limited experience and lack of stakeholder support from relevant officials.

Quantitative researcher with doctorate in statistics seeks NIW for EB-2 classification to develop statistical methodologies for big data research. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance; work restricted by employer covenants and lacks dissemination beyond employer and clients.

A designer and entrepreneur seeks EB-2 national interest waiver for AI-powered user experience and smart footwear technology. The AAO dismissed because although the endeavor has substantial merit in technology and business, the petitioner failed to establish its national importance, presenting vague claims across multiple industries without sufficient focused prospective impact.

Graduate student researcher in artificial intelligence claimed exceptional ability and national interest waiver. Service center denied without analyzing national importance or waiver discretion. AAO remanded for complete Dhanasar analysis, finding service center misidentified the proposed endeavor and failed to assess specificity and prospective impact.

Clinical laboratory scientist proposes AI forecasting models to address blood-bank shortages. AAO held endeavor has national importance but petitioner not well positioned to advance it: lacks demonstrated AI capabilities, formal machine learning education, and progress evidence despite prior statistics coursework and media attention.

Business management consultant with advanced degree seeks NIW. Petitioner claimed proposed management consulting services support federal priorities and address industry shortage. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks sufficient evidence of national importance, broader field implications, or substantial economic effects required under Dhanasar first prong.

Project engineer seeking EB-2 NIW for advanced simulation software development in mechanical engineering. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; impact on field insufficient and not extending beyond employer to justify waiver. Appeal dismissed.

Engineering graduate student self-petitioner sought NIW for AI research using linguistics and game theory. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked specific details and documented prospective impact required to establish national importance under Dhanasar first prong.

Senior scientist in translational medicine with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for research on novel therapies and diagnostics. AAO reversed denial on first prong but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish being well-positioned to advance the endeavor.

Civil and environmental engineer proposes infrastructure and sustainability research advancement. AAO held first prong met but second prong not met; petitioner's publications and citations lack evidence of implementation, government funding, or demonstrated progress toward advancing the specific proposed endeavor.

An interior designer sought EB-2 NIW to establish nonprofit organization promoting sustainable design through education and workshops. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance the nonprofit endeavor due to insufficient evidence of current efforts and lack of secured funding.