AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
262 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-1ASports and athleticsJun 2023Sustained
A professional baseball player sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. He claimed and met four criteria: awards, published material, critical role, and high salary. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding the petitioner demonstrated sustained national acclaim and recognized achievements, qualifying him as among the small percentage at the top of professional baseball.
5 of 5 criteria metRead → - O-1ASports and athleticsMay 2023Dismissed
Fitness company petitioned for bodybuilder beneficiary as O-1A extraordinary ability. Director denied on contract sufficiency and failure to meet three of eight criteria. AAO dismissed appeal, finding serious errors and discrepancies in employment contract, including two contracts for same period and unresolved inconsistencies, made appeal dispositive without reaching other grounds.
1 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsApr 2023Remanded
A competitive swimmer sought EB-1A classification. The director found two criteria met; the AAO added a third by recognizing team captain role within a division as qualifying. With three criteria satisfied, the matter was remanded for final merits analysis on sustained acclaim and top-tier status.
3 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsApr 2023Dismissed
Swimmer self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met three initial criteria but AAO affirmed dismissal, finding no sustained national or international acclaim; personal best times ranked outside top tier of global swimmers; national records insufficient to demonstrate top-tier recognition.
3 of 5 criteria metRead → - O-1ASports and athleticsApr 2023Remanded
A soccer camp petitions for O-1A for a beneficiary transitioning from professional soccer player to coach. The AAO remanded because the Director improperly excluded athletic achievements in assessing extraordinary ability and erred in rejecting the gold medal as major award without requesting additional evidence on coaching eligibility.
1 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsMar 2023Dismissed
Athletic coach claimed three criteria for extraordinary ability in soccer coaching. Director found one criterion met. Petitioner on appeal reasserted awards and published material criteria. AAO held petitioner failed to establish awards were nationally recognized or that published material about him as coach appeared in major media, lacking required sustained acclaim.
1 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsMar 2023Dismissed
A karate athlete sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The petitioner claimed awards, published material, and membership criteria. The AAO found the awards were not nationally or internationally recognized for excellence due to competition restrictions, articles lacked proper documentation, and the overall record did not evidence sustained international acclaim or top-tier standing.
0 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsMar 2023Dismissed
Professional baseball player in Dominican Republic claimed four criteria for EB-1A. AAO found awards and high salary met but rejected published material; membership not established. Only two criteria satisfied; three required. No sustained international acclaim shown.
2 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsMar 2023Dismissed
Mixed martial arts athlete claimed major international award and four additional criteria. Director found only published material criterion met. Petitioner on appeal reasserted major award and other criteria. AAO held petitioner lacked evidence of major international award recognition and original athletic contributions, failing sustained acclaim standard.
1 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsFeb 2023Dismissed
Professional tennis player seeking extraordinary ability classification failed to establish either major award or three alternate criteria. Court found published material about competitive career insufficient since petitioner intended to work as coach, and salary comparison limited to Chinese players unconvincing. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsFeb 2023Dismissed
A soccer coach sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The director found one criterion met (judging); the AAO affirmed only this finding. With one criterion met against the three required and no major award, the petitioner failed to demonstrate the sustained national or international acclaim required.
1 of 5 criteria metRead → - O-1ASports and athleticsFeb 2023Dismissed
A sports management company petitioned for a sumo wrestler seeking O-1A extraordinary ability. The applicant met only the awards criterion. Claims of membership in elite associations and published media coverage failed because the federation membership lacked documented outstanding achievement requirements and articles lacked proper attribution. Fewer than three criteria were satisfied so appeal was dismissed.
1 of 9 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsFeb 2023Dismissed
Figure skating choreographer and coach sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. She claimed seven criteria including membership, published material, scholarly articles and exhibitions. AAO held she met only judging criterion and failed to meet three-criterion threshold because membership lacked documentation, publications lacked translation compliance and scholarly article was not in qualifying venue.
1 of 8 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsJan 2023Dismissed
Bodybuilder claimed extraordinary ability through five criteria. AAO found none met: membership based only on regional contest win; published material in non-qualifying venues; critical role lacking evidence of organizational distinction. No sustained acclaim demonstrated.
0 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsJan 2023Dismissed
A competitive aircraft model pilot sought EB-1A classification. He claimed membership, published material, and one other criterion. The AAO found he did not establish major award status or three alternate criteria, including that his blog posts were not major media and his title did not evidence association membership. The appeal was dismissed.
0 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athletics2023Dismissed
Sambo and judo champion sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner failed to present either a major international award or three qualifying criteria; record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim requisite for the classification.
1 of 4 criteria metRead → - O-1ASports and athleticsOct 2022Dismissed
A martial arts school petitioned for O-1 classification for a coach. The beneficiary met only one criterion (judging). The AAO affirmed dismissal because membership and published material criteria were not satisfied and beneficiary failed to establish at least three of eight required criteria for extraordinary ability.
1 of 9 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsSep 2022Dismissed
A martial arts athlete self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed, finding the petitioner failed to meet three of ten evidentiary criteria. Awards lacked national/international recognition outside one association; membership status unsubstantiated; published material insufficient.
0 of 5 criteria metRead → - O-1ASports and athleticsSep 2022Dismissed
A skydiving center sought to employ a beneficiary as an O-1A nonimmigrant skydiving instructor. The beneficiary met only the awards criterion but failed to establish at least three required criteria overall; the appeal was dismissed because the petitioner could not satisfy the initial evidentiary threshold.
1 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsAug 2022Dismissed
A rhythmic gymnast sought extraordinary ability classification under EB-1A. She claimed three criteria: lesser awards, published material, and original contributions. The AAO affirmed denial, finding she did not meet any criterion because her awards lacked documented national or international recognition, her media coverage was insufficient, and she presented no evidence of original contributions of major significance.
0 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsAug 2022Dismissed
Martial arts competitor and coach sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Satisfied awards and judging criteria only. AAO rejected membership claim lacking expert recognition documentation and published material claim lacking proper attribution and venue. Failed to meet three-criterion threshold or demonstrate top-of-field extraordinary ability.
2 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsAug 2022Dismissed
A soccer player met four initial extraordinary ability criteria but failed the final merits test. AAO found his 15-year career and media coverage did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of professional soccer.
4 of 5 criteria metRead → - O-1ASports and athleticsAug 2022Dismissed
Dismissed · 4 criteria reviewed1 of 4 criteria metRead → - O-1ASports and athleticsJun 2022Dismissed
Fitness management company petitioned for O-1A classification for bodybuilder after initial approval was revoked. AAO dismissed appeal, affirming revocation because beneficiary met only awards criterion and lacked sufficient documentation of membership, publications, and legitimate high salary evidence.
1 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsJun 2022Remanded
An entrepreneur in vehicle competition and recreation sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO remanded because the Director failed to properly analyze several claimed criteria and applied unsupported evidentiary standards, particularly regarding published material and continuation of work in the United States.
1 of 7 criteria metRead →
