Published AAO appeal decisions

Business consultant and executive self-petitioner claimed three EB-1A criteria. AAO dismissed motion to reopen because evidence was either available during original RFE or postdated the petition filing, violating the requirement to establish eligibility at time of petition.

Logistics manager seeking NIW for EB-2 classification to establish startup consulting and software company in Florida. AAO affirmed SCOPS denial, finding proposed endeavor lacked national importance because impacts remained localized to company clients without establishing broader industry implications or substantiated economic effects.

Industrial engineer proposing retail loss prevention and supply chain management business seeking EB-2 NIW. AAO withdrew SCOPS determination on substantial merit, accepting it. However, petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance; employment projections and revenue forecasts insufficient to establish significant employment or economic impact regionally or nationally beyond specific clients.

Sales division manager and technical advisor sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver under Dhanasar framework. AAO issued notice of intent to dismiss and instructed response within thirty-three days. Petitioner failed to respond within required timeframe; appeal dismissed as abandoned.

A prospective management consultant seeks EB-2 national interest waiver to establish a small consultancy for businesses. The AAO affirmed denial because the proposed venture, though economically sound locally, lacks national importance; it does not demonstrate impact beyond the immediate community or region required for a waiver.

Logistics management consultant sought EB-2 exceptional ability and NIW. AAO affirmed that petitioner failed to satisfy required exceptional ability criteria: academic record not related to field, insufficient salary evidence, only 8 years 8 months experience not 10 years required, and no professional license. Ineligible for underlying classification; NIW prongs not reached.

Entrepreneur and fitness trainer seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver to lead corporate wellness company optimizing employer fitness programs. AAO dismissed because proposed endeavor lacks national importance; business projections and HUBZone location do not demonstrate broader economic impact or field implications.

A management and financial analyst sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for a business venture. The AAO dismissed her second motion to reopen and reconsider because she submitted no new facts or evidence, and her contentions reasserted already-rejected arguments without establishing legal or policy error in prior decisions.

A logistics entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO found he qualified as advanced degree professional but lacked evidence that his proposed logistics consulting company would generate substantial economic effects reaching national importance. The AAO dismissed his appeal without addressing remaining Dhanasar prongs.

Business and marketing professional seeking NIW as EB-2. Motions submitted articles on small business economic importance and job-creation multipliers. AAO held first prong failed because industry importance differs from specific endeavor importance; claimed job creation projections lack foundation and do not reach substantial positive economic effects.

An entrepreneur and business consultant seeking EB-2 with NIW to establish a global business strategy and financial advisory firm claimed alignment with national priorities and job creation potential. The AAO found insufficient evidence that the endeavor would have broader implications or national importance beyond its clients.

Operational manager seeking NIW for small business consulting endeavor focused on sustainable economic growth. Claimed national importance through alignment with government priorities and job creation projections. AAO dismissed because specific endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance; general alignment with national objectives and unsupported employment projections insufficient.

CEO and trucking-logistics company owner claimed national interest waiver for EB-2. Service center found advanced degree qualification but denied waiver; AAO dismissed appeal, holding proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar first prong because revenue data and job projections do not demonstrate substantial regional or national economic effects.

A program officer in international development with advanced degree seeks EB-2 NIW classification. Petitioner's professional experience in refugee resettlement and development was substantial, but AAO found the specific proposed endeavor lacked evidence of national importance. Appeal dismissed under first Dhanasar prong.

Consultant and entrepreneur proposed establishing consulting company serving SMEs. AAO held the endeavor lacks national importance because petitioner showed only direct client benefits and failed to demonstrate broader field impact at level required by Dhanasar.

A business consultant mentoring immigrant entrepreneurs claimed extraordinary ability. The AAO found he did not meet the threshold of three evidentiary criteria and, alternatively, that he failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim and place among the very top of his field.

A real estate broker seeks extraordinary ability classification. She claimed membership and high salary criteria. The AAO affirmed denial because she did not receive a major award, did not meet three alternative criteria, and did not establish sustained national or international acclaim required for EB-1A.

A business executive in the pomegranate industry sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed motions to reopen and reconsider, finding the petitioner failed to establish three required criteria on published material and high salary, and did not meet the initial evidentiary threshold.

An entrepreneur sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with NIW. The AAO upheld dismissal because she failed to meet three of six exceptional ability criteria (no qualifying license, insufficient years of experience, insufficient salary, no professional membership). The NIW merits were not addressed.

An automotive quality manager sought EB-2 NIW classification. Although the Director found substantial merit and that the petitioner was well-positioned to advance automotive quality improvements, the AAO affirmed dismissal, finding insufficient evidence of national importance beyond general industry benefits.

An IT project manager with advanced degree claims NIW to establish healthcare consulting company. AAO dismissed appeal, finding although underlying EB-2 eligibility established, proposed endeavor lacks national importance; job creation projections insufficient without evidence of regional or national economic impact.

A business administrator with advanced degree seeks EB-2 NIW classification. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance of proposed consulting endeavor. Work would benefit direct clients only without broader industry impact. Appeal dismissed under first Dhanasar prong.

Business consultant self-petitioner claimed six extraordinary ability criteria. AAO dismissed motion to reconsider, upholding prior findings that published material, original contributions, and scholarly articles criteria were not met. Membership and leading role criteria were reserved as unnecessary since three criteria minimum was not satisfied.

A barber and entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW to establish a barbershop and school. The AAO dismissed a third motion to reopen and reconsider, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of the endeavor and did not meet criteria for exceptional ability; new industry articles about barber shops did not specifically address this applicant's particular proposed endeavor.

Aviation consultant seeks EB-2 with national interest waiver. Claimed proposed company would provide economic revitalization, employment, and advance aviation safety. AAO held endeavor lacks national importance: limited employment potential, no evidence of industry-wide impact, and unsubstantiated claims about safety and sustainability.