Published AAO appeal decisions

A digital transformation architect satisfied three initial criteria but failed the final merits test. AAO found his Salesforce certification, recent judging, publications, and employment did not demonstrate sustained acclaim or placement among the very top of the field required for extraordinary ability.

Software development engineer in test claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A, citing five criteria. AAO found he met judging and high salary criteria but abandoned other claims on appeal. Two criteria insufficient; record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability classification.

Research engineer seeks NIW under EB-2 to conduct research in vehicle safety, renewable energy, and data centers. AAO dismissed, finding substantial merit but insufficient evidence of national importance; research activities limited to employer and clients without demonstrated broader implications.

IT consultant sought EB-2 with national interest waiver claiming exceptional ability. AAO affirmed second denial after remand, finding only one of six exceptional ability criteria met. National importance not established for proposed IT consulting endeavor.

Founder and CEO of an AI platform company sought EB-1A classification. Petitioner claimed seven evidentiary criteria and sustained acclaim. AAO affirmed SCOPS finding that only judging criterion was met. Venture capital funding, fellowship participation, and other claims failed because they lacked necessary recognition or expert evaluation. Appeal dismissed.

Computer science PhD studying efficient AI model deployment met first Dhanasar prong on substantial merit and national importance. However, AAO found insufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor through citations, letters, and research record. Third prong not reached. Appeal dismissed.

A technical program manager claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A, meeting two of ten criteria. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding insufficient evidence of extraordinary ability. Petitioner satisfied judging and scholarly articles criteria but failed to demonstrate that his original contributions had major significance or that he had national or international acclaim.

A machine learning engineer with a master's degree sought EB-2 NIW for research into autonomous driving and robotics systems. The AAO confirmed he met the advanced degree requirement and that his endeavor had substantial merit, but rejected the petition because his proposed research lacked sufficient evidence of national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.

Computer scientist with master's degree in electrical engineering sought EB-2 NIW for individual research optimizing spectrum sensing in wireless networks. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance. Petitioner failed to show individual research would impact field on scale commensurate with national importance despite field relevance.

Technology entrepreneur and CEO claims extraordinary ability in AI systems and industrial devices. Petitioner satisfied two criteria (scholarly articles, critical role) but failed to meet three required criteria. Awards claim unsupported; venture capital not a recognized prize. Membership requirements lack outstanding achievement standard. Appeal dismissed.

An information systems researcher self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Although three initial criteria were satisfied, the applicant failed to establish sufficient additional criteria or sustained national or international acclaim. The AAO found original contributions lacked major significance, published materials came from non-major outlets, and comparative salary evidence was absent.

Computational fluid dynamics researcher with advanced degree sought national interest waiver as EB-2. Petitioner proposed research on thermal management systems. AAO dismissed appeal, finding inadequate evidence of research success, sustained government funding interest, or detailed plan for advancing proposed endeavor.

A systems engineer sought NIW to design cybersecurity frameworks for U.S. energy and oil-gas infrastructure. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor scope too broadly defined and implausible, and that general cybersecurity importance did not establish the specific endeavor's national importance.

Self-petitioner seeking to establish an IT security consulting firm in Florida claims national interest waiver. Petitioner demonstrated substantial merit of cybersecurity work but failed to show national importance; individual company services lack broader implications extending beyond clients to impact field, region, or nation at requisite level.

A cybersecurity engineer claiming extraordinary ability in EB-1A satisfied four of seven claimed criteria. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding that while regulatory criteria were met, the totality of evidence failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim and placement among the very top in the field.

An IT specialist in cloud computing and cybersecurity sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. He claimed seven criteria; the Service Center found four met. On appeal, the AAO rejected awards and memberships as unmet and concluded the petitioner failed to satisfy the three-criterion threshold, so final merits was not addressed. Appeal dismissed.

A software engineer with a master's in computer engineering seeks EB-2 NIW for work in AI recommendation systems and APIs. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the endeavor failed the national importance prong of Dhanasar because benefits do not extend beyond the employer to regional or national scope.

Data scientist with advanced degree pursuing PhD in Digital Transformation sought NIW for research on bio-inspired feature reduction algorithms. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but concluded petitioner lacked sufficient record of success or evidence to demonstrate being well positioned to advance the work. Appeal dismissed.

A software engineer with a master's degree in electrical and computer engineering sought an NIW for work in edge AI computing. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to establish national importance through credible, probative evidence comparable to the standard set in Dhanasar.

An applied scientist and machine learning engineer seeks EB-2 NIW to advance energy security and industrial AI systems. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient national importance under Dhanasar's first prong despite claims about AI field value.

An engineer and applied scientist sought EB-2 NIW classification for work in artificial intelligence and machine learning. The AAO found the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient definition and failed to demonstrate national importance distinct from general field value, as required under Dhanasar. Appeal dismissed without addressing remaining prongs.

Post-doctoral fellow in industrial engineering and operations research sought EB-2 NIW for machine learning research. AAO found endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but petitioner lacked sufficient positioning to advance it. Appeal dismissed.

Assistant professor with Ph.D. in computer science proposing STEM research endeavor claiming national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner not well-positioned to advance the endeavor; peer review is common academic activity, funding sources unclear, research citations narrowly circulated, insufficient evidence of feasibility or field impact.

Web developer and digital designer seeks NIW for EB-2 self-employment in web development and STEM training with free courses for underserved populations. Petitioner claimed alignment with national workforce shortage and STEM equity priorities. AAO dismissed, finding endeavor lacks national importance; field importance and general national goals do not establish specific endeavor's national importance.

Computer scientist specializing in bioinformatics employed by technology company sought EB-2 with NIW. AAO dismissed because evidence demonstrated field importance but failed to establish national importance of petitioner's specific proposed research endeavor or its prospective impact under Dhanasar.