Published AAO appeal decisions

Employer petitions for beneficiary as senior site reliability engineer under EB-2 with NIW, claiming role advances cloud infrastructure and U.S. technological competitiveness. AAO held endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance; beneficiary's specific contributions lack demonstrated broader impact on U.S. economy or field beyond employer.

An electronic products manufacturer sponsored an NIW petition for a beneficiary with a master's in computer science to develop AI and data analytics infrastructure. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding while the endeavor had substantial merit, the petitioner failed to establish national importance because benefits would not extend beyond the company and its clients.

A senior site reliability engineer seeks EB-2 NIW for work in cloud infrastructure and digital entertainment. Beneficiary established advanced degree eligibility and endeavor substantial merit, but failed to demonstrate national importance of specific proposed work beyond field and employer significance.

IT specialist self-petitioner seeking NIW to establish IT consultancy providing e-commerce security and development services. Claimed national importance through worker shortage and innovative solutions. AAO held technologies not demonstrated as unique or innovative; profits and employment levels not substantial for IT industry; endeavor lacks broader field impact.

AI researcher with Ph.D. in electrical engineering seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability. Met two criteria: judging and scholarly articles. AAO dismissed appeal, finding original contributions criterion not met due to insufficient evidence of major significance; bulk of work predates 2014 and citations concentrated before 2019, insufficient for sustained national acclaim.

Computer vision and AI researcher sought EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, and applicant well positioned to advance it via advanced degree and publication record. However, waiver not warranted: while work involves critical emerging technology, evidence did not show national interest sufficiently urgent to justify forgoing labor certification process.

Senior machine learning engineer seeks EB-2 with national interest waiver for software engineering research. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked national importance; work was limited to employer interests and clients without broader implications for United States.

Software engineer with Ph.D. in electrical and computer engineering sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Director found first prong met but third prong failed. AAO affirmed first prong for research only but withdrew finding on second prong. Petitioner failed third prong: work primarily benefits employer, no evidence labor certification inappropriate, insufficient urgency. Dismissed.

A machine learning engineer self-petitioned for EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO found he qualified with an advanced degree but denied the waiver. Generic publications about artificial intelligence and the 2023 AI Executive Order do not establish national importance of his specific research and development work for his current employer.

An information security engineer sought extraordinary ability classification. The service center accepted judging and scholarly articles, and the appeal disputed three more: awards, original contributions and high salary. The AAO dismissed it, finding those criteria unmet and no sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing shown in the overall record.

A software engineer seeking EB-2 national interest waiver for digital platform work claimed national economic and security implications. The AAO dismissed, finding petitioner worked in important field but failed to establish how specific endeavor would result in broader implications or direct attribution of national impact to petitioner's work.

Senior security engineer claiming extraordinary ability in IT security. Petitioner claimed seven criteria but satisfied only two: judging and high salary. AAO dismissed appeal, finding insufficient evidence of national or international recognition, outstanding achievements through memberships, or published materials meeting regulatory standards. Record lacks evidence of sustained acclaim placing petitioner at field's top.

Language testing researcher and machine learning engineer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed advanced degree eligibility but dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance and petitioner not well-positioned to advance it under Dhanasar framework.

Software developer and entrepreneur claiming extraordinary ability under EB-1A. Met three initial criteria: judging, scholarly articles, and leading role. AAO dismissed appeal, finding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or that petitioner ranks among small percentage at field's top.

An employer petitioned for EB-2 national interest waiver for a software engineer specializing in thermal management for electric vehicles. The AAO dismissed, finding the specific proposed work lacked evidence of broader industry or field implications rising to national importance, despite the importance of electric vehicle development and sustainability goals generally.

A gaming electronics company sought extraordinary ability classification for a foreign game design lead, claiming five criteria. The AAO found two criteria met (leading role and high salary) but rejected awards and published material claims and found insufficient sustained individual acclaim, dismissing the appeal for failing the three-criterion threshold.

Software and systems architect in autonomous vehicle technology sought NIW. AAO dismissed because although the field has national importance, the petitioner failed to show his specific proposed work would impact the industry broadly; benefits to employer and business partners alone do not satisfy national importance.

An IT business analyst seeks an EB-2 NIW to operate an identity management consulting startup as CEO. The AAO dismissed, finding the proposed business lacks national importance despite its competent leadership and valuable client services.

Research scientist with PhD in materials science seeking EB-1A classification claimed to meet three of ten regulatory criteria. AAO found she met judging and scholarly articles criteria but failed to demonstrate original contributions of major significance. Appeal dismissed because petitioner has not shown sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

Design release engineer for automotive company sought NIW for work on electric vehicle and autonomous vehicle systems. AAO held beneficiary's specific engineering role, though in important industry, lacks demonstrated broader implications or national importance distinct from general employer significance.

Machine learning engineer with advanced degree seeks NIW. Claimed AI research would advance field and generate healthcare savings with national importance. AAO found vague descriptions of intended research without specific details or documentation of prospective impact; working in important AI field alone insufficient without demonstrating specific endeavor's national importance.

IT auditor with advanced degree seeks NIW for cybersecurity and AI consulting endeavor. SCOPS revoked approval, concluding endeavor lacks national importance. AAO affirms that petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance; proposed work extends only to employer and customers without evidence of regional or national economic impact or innovation significance.

Cybersecurity entrepreneur proposed establishing a consulting company under EB-2 with NIW. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacks sufficient national importance because services would not extend beyond the client base, provide substantial economic effects, or represent significant market share in the field.

A software engineer with a master's degree seeks EB-2 with NIW for cloud computing and STEM education contributions. SCOPS approved the underlying EB-2 and second prong but denied the waiver. The AAO dismissed because the proposed endeavor lacks sufficient national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.

A bioinformatics doctoral candidate and researcher sought EB-1A classification. Evidence met three evidentiary criteria: judging, original contributions, and scholarly articles. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the final merits analysis showed insufficient sustained national or international acclaim and that applicant was not among the small percentage at the very top of his field.