Published AAO appeal decisions

A relationship manager with advanced degree seeks NIW claiming to improve financial access and security through Islamic finance services. AAO affirmed denial because the petitioner failed to establish national importance of the specific proposed endeavor, lacking sufficient detail about strategies and prospective nationwide impact.

An economist in financial inclusion and innovation sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to satisfy at least three of ten evidentiary criteria and did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for this highly restrictive classification.

Financial analyst sought EB-2 NIW with advanced degree in finance. AAO affirmed denial, holding petitioner did not establish national importance of continuing financial analyst work; general claims of supporting resilience and aligning with federal priorities, or referencing critical emerging technologies list, insufficient without specific evidence of proposed endeavor impact. Second and third prongs reserved.

A wealth management strategist and financial consultant claims extraordinary ability under EB-1A. She met at least three criteria initially, but the AAO withdrew those determinations and found she failed to establish sustained acclaim or position among the elite in her field, dismissing the appeal.

An investment advisor seeks EB-2 NIW as advanced degree professional with national interest waiver. SCOPS found her qualified for underlying EB-2 but denied waiver. AAO affirmed, finding her proposed endeavor lacks national importance because working as investment trust manager would not impact her field broadly or generate substantial positive economic effects.

Finance specialist in power generation seeks NIW for EB-2 classification to advance M&A endeavor channeling capital into power and battery storage projects. AAO affirmed EB-2 eligibility but rejected NIW because petitioner failed to demonstrate her specific proposed endeavor has national importance; industry-wide evidence insufficient without showing individual impact.

A finance professional self-petitioned for EB-2 NIW as anti-money laundering compliance specialist. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding her proposed endeavor lacks sufficient national importance despite alignment with federal priorities.

A financial planning consultant sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a consulting company serving small and medium-sized enterprises. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance because he did not show his individual company would reach the level of national-level economic impact required by Dhanasar.

Quantitative analyst with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver. SCOPS found petitioner qualified for underlying classification but denied waiver. AAO affirmed, finding petitioner presented inconsistent and changing proposed endeavors, preventing determination of national importance under Dhanasar first prong. Remaining prongs reserved.

Quantitative finance analyst self-petitioner sought EB-2 NIW. Claimed substantial merit and national importance of financial risk modeling work. AAO affirmed denial, finding no demonstrated national importance of the specific proposed endeavor despite industry importance; opinion letters lacked sufficient specificity.

A financial accountant claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A through multiple criteria. The AAO found only one criterion satisfied (scholarly articles), falling short of the required three. Published material lacked major media publication, leading role lacked organizational distinction, and salary comparison data was inapplicable. Appeal dismissed.

Finance manager filed combined motions to reopen and reconsider a dismissed NIW appeal. AAO found motion to reconsider untimely under regulations; motion to reopen also untimely, and even if excused, contained no evidence of national importance of proposed work, the dispositive issue in prior dismissal. Both motions dismissed.

Fintech entrepreneur seeks EB-2 with NIW claiming exceptional ability. AAO found petitioner met only one of six regulatory criteria despite service center's unsupported claim of three criteria. Final merits review confirmed lack of expertise significantly above ordinary level in finance. NIW not addressed.

Financial advisor self-petitioner appealed EB-1A denial. AAO found petitioner satisfied none of ten initial evidentiary criteria, rejecting claims of awards, memberships, publications, and judging experience. Appeal dismissed as petitioner failed to meet the threshold evidence requirement needed for final merits determination.

Financial analyst seeking EB-2 with NIW for financial advisory services initiative. AAO found petitioner lacks advanced degree meeting regulatory standard and proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar. Insufficient evidence demonstrated prospective impact on field, employment, or economic benefits at national level.

An accounting and tax consultant sought EB-1A classification in business. After the petition was denied and several motions were handled, the appeal concerned dismissal of a sixth motion to reopen and reconsider. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the motion offered no new facts or evidence and identified no legal error.

A general manager in fund management seeking to establish a firm claimed four criteria; two were met. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the petitioner satisfied only two of the required three initial evidentiary criteria, failing to meet the threshold for extraordinary ability classification.

A financial manager sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming three criteria: membership, original contributions, and a leading or critical role. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the membership criterion was not satisfied, so the three-criteria threshold could not be met. The other claimed criteria and the final merits were not decided.

A venture capital investment manager sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. He claimed four criteria but met only the high-salary criterion. The AAO affirmed the denial because he satisfied only two criteria, falling short of the three required before final merits analysis, and dismissed the appeal.

An economist sought EB-1A classification for extraordinary ability. The AAO found he met three evidentiary criteria: association membership, published material, and judging. However, on final merits determination, the record lacked evidence of published scholarly articles, government implementation of research, or sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability. Appeal dismissed.

Financial advisor and entrepreneur seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver proposes to grow small and medium-sized enterprises and improve tax systems. AAO held she lacked advanced degree eligibility; also did not establish national importance of the specific endeavor, as projections were uncorroborated and methods lacked demonstrated innovation or broader field implications.

Financial manager with eight years finance and four years management experience in Kazakhstan sought extraordinary ability classification claiming seven criteria. AAO found only judging criterion met (from SCOPS). Rejected awards, membership, original contributions, scholarly articles, and exhibitions. Appeal dismissed due to insufficient criteria satisfaction.

An advanced degree professional proposes to own and operate an LLC providing corporate financial management services to businesses. The AAO dismissed because the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; it would impact only the LLC's clients, not the field broadly, and the petitioner did not establish broader implications beyond her business.

Tax auditor seeking NIW for EB-2 exceptional ability classification claimed multiple criteria. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner met only academic record and experience criteria but failed to satisfy exceptional ability threshold; waiver analysis not reached due to underlying ineligibility.

An accountant with an advanced degree sought EB-2 NIW for his accounting firm business. The AAO found the proposed endeavor lacked national importance; his business plan projections and claims of alignment with government economic initiatives did not show impact beyond his individual clients at a level constituting national importance.