Published AAO appeal decisions

Actuarial associate sought EB-2 with national interest waiver to provide AI and machine learning solutions improving pension program solvency for public servants. The AAO dismissed, holding the petitioner failed to demonstrate the proposed endeavor has national importance; letters of support and general field importance do not establish the specific endeavor's broader implications.

Asset management managing partner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. The AAO found he met three initial criteria but dismissed the motion to reconsider because the totality of evidence did not show sustained national or international acclaim or that he is among the very top of the field.

An accountant with advanced degree sought NIW under EB-2. Service center analyzed wrong proposed endeavor (electrical engineering instead of financial consulting). AAO remanded because the denial did not address the petitioner's actual endeavor, noting the accountant's proposed financial consulting work likely does not meet Dhanasar's three prongs.

Financial manager sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed five criteria; SCOPS found only published material met, but AAO reversed that finding. AAO concluded petitioner satisfied no criteria and lacked the sustained national or international acclaim required for this highly restrictive classification.

An investment officer in the financial industry sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming awards, published material, leading roles, high pay and original contributions. The AAO withdrew the awards finding because only company awards were shown, left three criteria met, then dismissed the appeal for lack of sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.

Commercial bank manager with 30 years experience sought EB-2 NIW classification under Dhanasar framework. AAO affirmed that proposed endeavor, though substantially meritorious, lacked national importance. Evidence showed company sales projections and job creation at 16 employees but failed to demonstrate substantial positive economic effects at national level required by Dhanasar.

Management analyst with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver for endeavor improving financial services in underserved areas. AAO found substantial merit but insufficient national importance; impact was not shown to extend broadly to industry level, so dismissed the appeal.

An investment portfolio manager claimed four EB-1A criteria. SCOPS denied without adequately analyzing submitted evidence or explaining rejections. The AAO found SCOPS failed to address the plain language of the criteria with specificity and remanded for proper re-evaluation and meaningful opportunity for response.

Managing director in financial services risk management seeks EB-1A classification. Six of seven claimed initial criteria met but appeal dismissed in final merits analysis. Record shows noteworthy accomplishments but insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim at very top of field.

A financial director and entrepreneur with an advanced degree in finance sought NIW for work as finance director at a used car dealership. The AAO found her original endeavor lacked substantial merit and national importance due to vague descriptions and generic claims about economic benefits without specific, prospective impact evidence.

A specialist in prevention and investigation of financial crimes and money laundering sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding petitioner failed to establish any of the claimed eight initial criteria and could not meet the three-criterion threshold; final merits determination also failed.

Financial risk specialist sought EB-1A classification. Service center found judging and original contributions met; AAO withdrew both findings, concluding judging students does not meet regulatory requirements and contributions lacked evidence of significant impact. Petitioner failed to meet three criteria threshold.

A relationship manager with advanced degree seeks NIW claiming to improve financial access and security through Islamic finance services. AAO affirmed denial because the petitioner failed to establish national importance of the specific proposed endeavor, lacking sufficient detail about strategies and prospective nationwide impact.

An economist in financial inclusion and innovation sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to satisfy at least three of ten evidentiary criteria and did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for this highly restrictive classification.

Financial analyst sought EB-2 NIW with advanced degree in finance. AAO affirmed denial, holding petitioner did not establish national importance of continuing financial analyst work; general claims of supporting resilience and aligning with federal priorities, or referencing critical emerging technologies list, insufficient without specific evidence of proposed endeavor impact. Second and third prongs reserved.

A wealth management strategist and financial consultant claims extraordinary ability under EB-1A. She met at least three criteria initially, but the AAO withdrew those determinations and found she failed to establish sustained acclaim or position among the elite in her field, dismissing the appeal.

An investment advisor seeks EB-2 NIW as advanced degree professional with national interest waiver. SCOPS found her qualified for underlying EB-2 but denied waiver. AAO affirmed, finding her proposed endeavor lacks national importance because working as investment trust manager would not impact her field broadly or generate substantial positive economic effects.

Finance specialist in power generation seeks NIW for EB-2 classification to advance M&A endeavor channeling capital into power and battery storage projects. AAO affirmed EB-2 eligibility but rejected NIW because petitioner failed to demonstrate her specific proposed endeavor has national importance; industry-wide evidence insufficient without showing individual impact.

A finance professional self-petitioned for EB-2 NIW as anti-money laundering compliance specialist. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding her proposed endeavor lacks sufficient national importance despite alignment with federal priorities.

A financial planning consultant sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a consulting company serving small and medium-sized enterprises. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance because he did not show his individual company would reach the level of national-level economic impact required by Dhanasar.

Quantitative analyst with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver. SCOPS found petitioner qualified for underlying classification but denied waiver. AAO affirmed, finding petitioner presented inconsistent and changing proposed endeavors, preventing determination of national importance under Dhanasar first prong. Remaining prongs reserved.

Quantitative finance analyst self-petitioner sought EB-2 NIW. Claimed substantial merit and national importance of financial risk modeling work. AAO affirmed denial, finding no demonstrated national importance of the specific proposed endeavor despite industry importance; opinion letters lacked sufficient specificity.

A financial accountant claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A through multiple criteria. The AAO found only one criterion satisfied (scholarly articles), falling short of the required three. Published material lacked major media publication, leading role lacked organizational distinction, and salary comparison data was inapplicable. Appeal dismissed.

Finance manager filed combined motions to reopen and reconsider a dismissed NIW appeal. AAO found motion to reconsider untimely under regulations; motion to reopen also untimely, and even if excused, contained no evidence of national importance of proposed work, the dispositive issue in prior dismissal. Both motions dismissed.

Fintech entrepreneur seeks EB-2 with NIW claiming exceptional ability. AAO found petitioner met only one of six regulatory criteria despite service center's unsupported claim of three criteria. Final merits review confirmed lack of expertise significantly above ordinary level in finance. NIW not addressed.