Published AAO appeal decisions

Engineering project manager seeking NIW. Appeal dismissed because petitioner failed to establish eligibility for underlying EB-2 classification; credential evaluation did not comply with regulatory requirements and did not demonstrate academic equivalency of foreign education.

A mechanical and aerospace engineer with Ph.D. sought national interest waiver for EB-2. The AAO found his proposed research had substantial merit and national importance. However, he failed to demonstrate he was well positioned to advance the research because his education alone was insufficient and citation statistics and letters did not show personal research impact on the field.

Journeyman power lineman claimed exceptional ability and national interest waiver under EB-2. AAO found petitioner met only one of six exceptional ability criteria; lacked official academic records from qualifying institutions and failed to meet salary or recognition standards.

Structural engineer seeking NIW as assistant professor and researcher. Proposed endeavor materially changed after filing from researcher role to professor-researcher hybrid; national importance not established; petitioner failed to address director's conclusions on appeal.

Mechanical engineering researcher sought EB-2 national interest waiver for postdoctoral research position in aerospace technology. Qualifies as advanced degree holder but failed to establish national importance of proposed endeavor. Record did not demonstrate how technology advances broader field or has meaningful economic implications.

Maintenance and renovation engineer qualified as advanced degree professional sought national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of proposed maintenance services endeavor under Dhanasar first prong; work did not show broader implications or substantial economic benefits.

An aerospace engineer sought national interest waiver. AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, but the petitioner failed the second prong because his research lacked demonstrated field impact, his role in funding was unclear, and his work showed no record of progress in advancing space research.

Flight simulator engineer sought EB-2 classification and national interest waiver. AAO remanded because Director failed to adequately analyze underlying EB-2 eligibility and did not apply Dhanasar framework to NIW claim despite beneficiary identifying specific proposed endeavor.

Aircraft marketing company sponsoring aircraft design engineer for EB-2 national interest waiver. Beneficiary would perform engineering on passenger-to-ambulance and passenger-to-freight aircraft conversions. AAO affirmed denial, finding endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because record does not show broader industry implications, specific employment details, or sufficient positive economic effects beyond company operations.

Mechanical engineer employed by company seeks national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. Petitioner claimed his mechanical engineering work for automotive manufacturers would have national importance. AAO dismissed appeal, finding insufficient evidence that the specific proposed endeavor has national importance or substantial economic effects, failing the first Dhanasar prong.

Mechanical engineer with Ph.D. seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner held advanced degree but failed to establish substantial merit and national importance of proposed endeavor under Dhanasar framework. AAO dismissed because petitioner did not differentiate proposed research from past work or demonstrate prospective impact.

An engineer claimed six evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability classification. The AAO found the published material articles were about the employer or industry, not the petitioner's work, and lacked formal evidence of judging designation. The record failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.

A mechanical engineer with advanced degree sought NIW for HVAC engineering work. The AAO affirmed denial because her proposed work lacked sufficient national importance under Dhanasar's first prong; it would not impact the field broadly beyond her employer and clients.

An employer petitioned for an engineer to receive EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The beneficiary met two of ten criteria (judging and scholarly articles). On appeal, the AAO held the beneficiary failed to meet the required three criteria threshold because contributions lacked demonstrated major significance and sustained acclaim in the field was not established.

Aerospace engineer seeks NIW for EB-2 to continue research on aerodynamic and automatic control systems. AAO found proposed research met Dhanasar prong one with national importance and broader field implications. However, petitioner failed prong two: insufficient evidence showed he was well positioned to advance research despite Ph.D., publications, and support letters. Appeal dismissed.

A mechanical engineering professor from Nigeria claimed extraordinary ability through judging, scholarly articles, and critical roles. The AAO found he met three initial criteria but lacked evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of his field.

A medical device company sponsored a mechanical R&D engineer for EB-2 exceptional ability classification. This was not a national interest waiver case, and no waiver was requested. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the labor certification and offered wage did not show the position needs a person of exceptional ability.

An aeronautical engineer sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification to advise aviation manufacturers. The AAO dismissed the appeal because his proposed specific endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance despite his expertise and credentials, failing to show sufficient prospective impact on the aviation industry.