Published AAO appeal decisions

Project execution supervisor sought national interest waiver for EB-2 advanced degree. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed work lacks national importance despite meeting prong two; improvements limited to employer's projects without broader industry impact or demonstrated U.S. economic effects.

A professional with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for EB-2. The petitioner's motions to reopen and reconsider were dismissed because insufficient new evidence was presented. The AAO affirmed that letters of support and industry evidence did not establish the specific proposed endeavor had national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.

A petitioner proposed unspecified scientific activity and vendor machine development. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient specificity and clarity regarding substantial merit and national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.

A micropigmentation professional sought EB-2 classification as individual of exceptional ability and NIW. The AAO dismissed, finding she met only one of three required criteria for exceptional ability: a license to practice. Training certificates did not qualify as official academic records; membership claim was not properly substantiated.

An international organization staff member requested second preference classification as an individual of exceptional ability with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding his salary criterion unmet because the pay reflected a standardized scale rather than exceptional ability. It therefore did not reach the waiver question.