Published AAO appeal decisions

A capoeira coach sought second preference classification as an individual of exceptional ability with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner did not satisfy three exceptional ability criteria, so the waiver analysis was not reached. The decision is not a Dhanasar national interest waiver ruling.

Martial arts athlete and instructor claimed three criteria for EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO found one criterion met but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish three required criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim.

A racehorse jockey from Venezuela seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner claimed six criteria but established only high salary. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding no nationally or internationally recognized awards, no qualifying association membership, no published material in major media, no exhibitions, and insufficient evidence of sustained acclaim or top-tier status despite some domestic racing success.

A wrestling coach claimed extraordinary ability, meeting three evidentiary criteria. The AAO found the evidence lacked comparative data showing he ranks among the very top coaches and that his media coverage and achievements did not demonstrate the sustained acclaim required.

Dance competitor and instructor sought exceptional ability classification and national interest waiver. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance because competitive participation and instruction would not impact the field broadly, offer substantial job creation, or provide meaningful economic effects.

A weightlifter with exceptional ability seeks NIW for EB-2. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to provide specific proposed endeavor at filing; general intent to work in weightlifting lacks national importance and substantial merit as required.