Published AAO appeal decisions

A software engineer at an energy company sought EB-2 NIW for offshore infrastructure modernization work using digital-twin modeling. AAO found endeavor had substantial merit and national importance, and beneficiary was well positioned, but denied waiver because petitioner did not establish that labor certification was incompatible with the work.

Private equity firm sponsored senior associate beneficiary for EB-2 national interest waiver. Beneficiary has advanced degree and experience in agriculture and infrastructure sectors, but proposed endeavor lacks national importance; work scope limited to employer and clients despite alignment with national priorities.

A neuroscientist specializing in neurodegenerative diseases claimed five EB-1A criteria. AAO affirmed that only two criteria were met, dismissing the appeal because the petitioner satisfied fewer than three required initial evidentiary criteria, precluding a final merits analysis.

A tattoo artist sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the petitioner met only one of three claimed exceptional ability criteria; therefore, the underlying EB-2 classification was not established and national interest waiver Dhanasar prongs were not addressed.

A cybersecurity engineer claiming extraordinary ability in EB-1A satisfied four of seven claimed criteria. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding that while regulatory criteria were met, the totality of evidence failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim and placement among the very top in the field.

Director of growth marketing claims five criteria; AAO found only published material met. Petitioner demonstrated one of three required initial criteria. Because threshold not satisfied, AAO declined final merits determination and dismissed appeal based on insufficient evidentiary foundation.

An IT specialist in cloud computing and cybersecurity sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. He claimed seven criteria; the Service Center found four met. On appeal, the AAO rejected awards and memberships as unmet and concluded the petitioner failed to satisfy the three-criterion threshold, so final merits was not addressed. Appeal dismissed.

Research scientist with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for optimization and operations research. Decision found proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance but concluded she lacks sufficient record of success to be well positioned to advance it.

AI Strategist Leader proposed integrating AI into business strategies to boost efficiency and innovation. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance because it lacks documented broader implications for industry or employment impact beyond general reliance on AI field importance.

Research scientist seeking EB-2 national interest waiver claimed advanced degree and waiver eligibility under Dhanasar framework. AAO dismissed appeal, affirming SCOPS' finding that petitioner failed first prong: proposed connectomics research insufficiently described; lacks demonstration of substantial merit, national importance, or prospective impact.

A software engineer with a master's in computer engineering seeks EB-2 NIW for work in AI recommendation systems and APIs. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the endeavor failed the national importance prong of Dhanasar because benefits do not extend beyond the employer to regional or national scope.

Data scientist with advanced degree pursuing PhD in Digital Transformation sought NIW for research on bio-inspired feature reduction algorithms. AAO found proposed endeavor had substantial merit and national importance but concluded petitioner lacked sufficient record of success or evidence to demonstrate being well positioned to advance the work. Appeal dismissed.

Electrical engineer sought EB-1A classification based on extraordinary ability. Claimed awards, membership, published material, judging, contributions, and leading role. Service center found two criteria met; AAO found awards and membership not met and concluded petitioner lacked sustained national or international acclaim required for the classification.

A software engineer with a master's degree in electrical and computer engineering sought an NIW for work in edge AI computing. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to establish national importance through credible, probative evidence comparable to the standard set in Dhanasar.

A lawyer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The petitioner claimed four criteria: judging, original contributions, scholarly articles, and leading/critical role. The AAO found judging and contributions not met and declined to address the other two, dismissing for failure to satisfy the threshold of three criteria.

First assistant surgeon self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability. Claimed four criteria: association membership, original contributions, scholarly articles, and leading role. AAO found membership criterion not met and leading role criterion not met; original contributions and scholarly articles not analyzed. Appeal dismissed.

Pediatric resident with master's and medical degrees sought EB-2 NIW for translational research on fetal cardiology. AAO found national importance established but dismissed because petitioner lacked demonstrated record of research success, field attention, and current prospects needed to be well positioned.

A digital media marketing strategist and agency founder claims extraordinary ability. She met four initial criteria (membership, published material, judging, scholarly articles) but failed on awards and final merits. AAO held her achievements from 2019–2025 lack the sustained, high-impact recognition required for this elite classification.

Entrepreneur in trucking and logistics sought EB-2 NIW for truck business management consulting firm in Florida. AAO dismissed, holding proposed endeavor lacked national importance; general alignment with government initiatives and industry importance insufficient without evidence of specific innovations.

A food and product safety compliance professional sought EB-1A classification. The service center accepted three criteria and the petitioner claimed three more on appeal, which the AAO reserved. The AAO dismissed the appeal at the final merits step because the impact seemed limited to his employer and acclaim was not shown.

An applied scientist and machine learning engineer seeks EB-2 NIW to advance energy security and industrial AI systems. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient national importance under Dhanasar's first prong despite claims about AI field value.

Brazilian footvolley player, coach, trainer, and referee sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met three initial evidentiary criteria but failed final merits determination. AAO dismissed appeal, finding insufficient sustained national or international acclaim and failure to establish placement among elite practitioners in footvolley.

An employer petitioned for NIW for study management associate II overseeing oncology and hematology clinical trials for advanced therapies. AAO affirmed denial: while the work was meritorious, petitioner failed to show the specific endeavor had national importance or substantial economic impact beyond the employer's clients and consumers.