Published AAO appeal decisions

Mechanical engineer sought NIW for self-directed endeavor in product development and quality management. AAO held the proposed endeavor lacks national importance because it serves only the employer and clients, not the broader nation, and general industry importance does not establish specific endeavor importance under Dhanasar.

A film and media editor sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Though he met only one criterion (exhibitions), the AAO rejected awards and leading role findings due to insufficient documentation. He failed to meet the three-criterion threshold and lacked evidence of sustained national or international acclaim.

A financial manager with advanced degree seeks NIW for EB-2 as self-petitioner. AAO affirmed dismissal because proposed financial management and accounting work, while of substantial merit, lacked national importance; work would benefit specific employers and clients but not impact field or industry broadly.

A computer scientist and instructor sought EB-2 NIW classification. The AAO affirmed the Director's finding that the petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional but failed the first Dhanasar prong because she did not present a specific proposed endeavor and her teaching activities lacked broader field impact.

Pilot with advanced degree claimed NIW based on aviation industry pilot shortage and proposed flight instruction or academy work. AAO found proposed endeavor too vague with inconsistent job ideas to determine national importance, failing first Dhanasar prong.

A research scientist filed an extraordinary ability petition that the service center denied for failing to meet three of ten criteria. On appeal, the AAO did not review the merits because the petitioner had since become a permanent resident, making the matter moot, and dismissed the appeal.

Soccer coach sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO held although petitioner met three initial evidentiary criteria, evidence demonstrated only past national acclaim in Trinidad and Tobago with no recent materials, failing to show sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability classification.

Civil engineer qualified for EB-2 advanced degree sought national interest waiver for real estate development and construction company. AAO found his proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar's first prong, as it would not sufficiently impact the field or economy beyond his immediate employers.

An advanced degree holder in frozen dessert production sought national interest waiver. Although the petitioner showed business growth potential and economic impact projections, the AAO found insufficient evidence that the endeavor would substantially benefit the regional or national economy or create significant U.S. employment.

Child development psychologist sought NIW under EB-2. Director found substantial merit but not national importance. AAO affirmed, finding no evidence proposed work extends beyond clients and students to impact field broadly or create substantial U.S. jobs and economic effects.

Business administrator proposed to manage early childhood education franchises in Florida. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; benefits too localized. First Dhanasar prong failed; waiver denied.

A mathematics teacher sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The petition was first approved, then revoked by the Director. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the record did not show an advanced degree equivalent or five years of progressive experience, and it reserved the Dhanasar prongs.

An entrepreneur in the culinary and restaurant field sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO withdrew the director's findings on experience letters and professional membership and rejected the salary and recognition criteria. It dismissed the appeal and did not analyze the waiver under Dhanasar.

Aerospace technology specialist in air transportation modeling claiming extraordinary ability. Met scholarly articles and judging criteria but failed membership, original contributions, and leading role criteria. Only two of ten criteria established despite claiming four additional. Appeal dismissed for insufficient evidence of top-tier recognition.

A professional wrestler sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO found none of the claimed evidentiary criteria satisfied, including license, membership and recognition, and no advanced degree status. Because the threshold classification failed, the waiver question was treated as moot and the appeal was dismissed.

Public relations director sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. She claimed six criteria including awards, membership, and original contributions. AAO held she failed to meet at least three criteria: awards were organizational not individual, and membership evidence lacked required bylaws documentation.

A chief academic officer self-petitioner sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for online education business. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to articulate a specific proposed endeavor, instead describing multiple overlapping positions and activities without clear delineation.

A neurobiology researcher sought extraordinary ability classification after the service center found the initial evidentiary criteria unmet. The researcher filed two appeals of that denial. The AAO sustained the other appeal, so this duplicate appeal was dismissed as moot, and the petition will be approved through the sustained appeal.

Dental surgeon seeking NIW for advanced degree EB-2 to establish dental clinic. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance, petitioner not well positioned to advance it given focus on esthetician work, and labor shortage insufficient to balance waiver factors.

Self-petitioner speech and theatrical coach sought EB-1A classification. Met three preliminary criteria: judging, published material, critical role. AAO dismissed appeal because evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability classification.

Chief executive officer and solutions architect claimed four criteria including membership, published material, leading role, and high salary. AAO found none met. YPO membership lacked demonstrated outstanding achievement standard. Published materials insufficient in prominence or attribution. Executive experience alone does not establish upper echelon status required.

A robotics engineer proposed establishing a U.S.-based company providing remote-control services and consulting. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to establish that the proposed endeavor has national importance; generic field information and personal intentions do not demonstrate projected impact rising to substantial positive economic effects.

Information technology director seeking EB-2 advanced degree or exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. AAO found petitioner failed to establish foreign education equivalent to U.S. bachelor's degree and did not meet three criteria for exceptional ability. National importance of proposed endeavor also not established under Dhanasar framework.

Research associate in physics seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met three of ten initial evidentiary criteria including judging and scholarly articles. AAO held evidence insufficient for final merits determination; routine research activities and limited recognition do not establish sustained acclaim or top-tier status required for extraordinary ability.

Political scientist sought EB-2 national interest waiver after qualifying for advanced degree classification. Director found substantial merit but not national importance. AAO affirmed, holding petitioner failed to demonstrate specific prospective impact of Central Asian affairs research on field or U.S. economy at requisite level.