Published AAO appeal decisions

Legal analyst sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Director found petitioner qualified for underlying EB-2 classification but failed all three Dhanasar prongs. AAO affirmed, finding petitioner changed proposed endeavor from legal analyst to legal business analyst entrepreneur, preventing coherent Dhanasar analysis.

An entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW classification as advanced degree professional or exceptional ability individual. The AAO affirmed the Director's denial, finding insufficient evidence of advanced degree requirements and failure to meet three exceptional ability criteria. National interest waiver was not analyzed.

A civil engineer proposed a consulting business offering services to road and highway construction companies. The AAO affirmed dismissal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the specific endeavor has national importance under Dhanasar; describing the general importance of infrastructure and infrastructure priorities was insufficient without showing prospective impact.

Civil engineer self-petitioner claimed national interest waiver for consulting services in road and highway construction. AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance despite industry merit; employment potential and economic effects remain unspecified and insufficient.

Transplant surgeon seeking EB-1A classification. Claimed six criteria; service center found only two met (judging and scholarly articles). AAO affirmed, finding remaining four criteria unsatisfied and concluding cumulative evidence insufficient for extraordinary ability at very top of field.

A business executive in the fitness equipment industry sought EB-1A classification, and the service center denied the petition for lacking initial evidence. The AAO found State Department records contradicting her claimed employment history, issued a notice of intent to dismiss that was returned undeliverable, and dismissed the appeal as abandoned for no response.

Jazz percussionist and music instructor sought EB-1A classification. Met three evidentiary criteria initially but AAO held he failed final merits test, lacking sustained national or international acclaim and failing to demonstrate standing among the very top musicians in his field.

An advanced degree professional proposed a personalized fitness and wellness business. The AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance, concluding the endeavor lacked broader implications beyond servicing individual clients and would not provide substantial economic effects to merit a waiver.

Security management specialist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 eligibility as advanced degree professional or person of exceptional ability on appeal, abandoning the threshold issue. AAO dismissed appeal without addressing Dhanasar prongs.

A plant pathologist sought extraordinary ability classification based on research on tropical fruit diseases. The Director accepted two criteria; the petitioner argued a third, original contributions. The AAO dismissed the appeal because a patent without adoption or demonstrated impact did not show major significance, and the overall record lacked sustained acclaim.

A petitioner sought O-1A classification for a beneficiary writer, academic, curator, and poet. The AAO dismissed the appeal based on waived procedural issues: insufficient contract, failure to demonstrate events and activities, unmet advisory opinion requirement, and non-compliance with initial evidence thresholds.

A general and operations manager and self-founder of a freight transportation company sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the proposed endeavor lacks national importance; it does not demonstrate national or global implications or substantial positive economic effects beyond specific clients.

A self-petitioner seeking national interest waiver for security consulting business proposed to provide expertise to U.S. companies. AAO held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance because the business would operate only for specific clients without broader implications for the field or meaningful economic impact.

Entrepreneur and financier in business sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed at least three evidentiary criteria including awards and leadership role. AAO found awards lacked recognition as nationally or internationally prestigious for excellence in business and concluded petitioner lacks sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

A soccer player met four initial extraordinary ability criteria but failed the final merits test. AAO found his 15-year career and media coverage did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of professional soccer.

Sound engineer and technical director in television and radio industry sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Failed to meet three of ten initial evidentiary criteria; judging and exhibitions claims withdrawn or unsupported, original contributions lacked objective attribution. AAO dismissed, finding insufficient sustained acclaim.

Entrepreneur seeking national interest waiver for EB-2 advanced degree classification claimed endeavor in business consulting or biodegradable cleaning products. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner provided inconsistent and insufficient evidence of proposed endeavor, failing first prong of Dhanasar by not demonstrating national importance or broader implications.

Supply chain manager sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner submitted conflicting descriptions of her endeavor between initial petition and RFE response, later mentioning vegan cosmetic imports. AAO found insufficient clarity and consistency to identify the specific proposed endeavor and ruled it lacked national importance.

An actor sought extraordinary ability classification under EB-1A. The service center denied the petition partly because the petitioner failed to demonstrate intent to continue work in the field in the United States despite requests for evidence. The AAO dismissed the appeal without addressing the claimed evidentiary criteria because the petitioner waived the intent to work issue.

Beneficiary seeking EB-1A as athletic instruction school chief instructor and former competitor. AAO dismissed because beneficiary met only one of ten criteria (judging) when three required; lacks sustained recent national/international acclaim; record does not support extraordinary ability.

A neuroscientist with postdoctoral research position seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. He claimed three criteria: judging, scholarly articles, and original contributions. The AAO found he met judging and scholarly articles but not original contributions of major significance. He failed to meet the final merits threshold requiring sustained national or international acclaim.

A software developer sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification to start an IT consulting firm. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding that while the endeavor had substantial merit, the proposed employment of eight workers lacked broader industry implications and substantial economic effects required for national importance.

Medical administrator proposing to open a dental clinic claimed three Dhanasar prongs. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the specific endeavor lacks national importance because record does not explain affordable high-quality delivery in U.S. context, and petitioner is not well positioned given unfamiliarity with U.S. healthcare system.