Published AAO appeal decisions

Supply chain and materials management professional met three initial EB-1A criteria through published material, judging, and critical role. However, AAO affirmed dismissal because evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that petitioner rose to the small percentage at the very top of his field.

A petitioner sought to establish extraordinary ability for their beneficiary, claiming satisfaction of regulatory criteria without a major award. Although the service center found three criteria met, the AAO withdrew one finding on published material and found the totality of evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top of the field, dismissing the appeal.

High school mathematics teacher with fifteen years experience seeks NIW for EB-2 to develop hybrid and distance learning instructional framework. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to address USCIS findings on the third Dhanasar prong and waived the issue by failing to contest specific conclusions about impracticality of labor certification and national benefit.

Self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed a fourth combined motion to reopen and reconsider, holding the petitioner failed to establish that the prior decision was legally incorrect and did not provide sufficient new facts warranting reopening. The underlying petition denial stood.

Chemical engineer with five years pharmaceutical and biotechnology experience sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Proposed developing analytical methods and processes for vaccine and therapeutic manufacturing. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to demonstrate proposed work has national importance; work appeared routine to employer without broader industry impact.

An automotive company petitioned to employ a process controls engineer under EB-2 NIW, claiming the EV battery assembly work has national importance. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar's first prong, as impact appears limited to employer and immediate business partners rather than industry-wide.

Neuroscientist with doctorate and postdoctoral experience seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability. Satisfied three evidentiary criteria including scholarly articles and original contributions. AAO held final merits analysis failed because citation records and institution prestige do not establish sustained national acclaim or placement in very top of field.

Managing director of electric vehicle repair and customization shop. Claimed seven evidentiary criteria including awards and published material. AAO found none met. Awards lacked national recognition; published material articles mostly not about petitioner or from non-major media. Appeal dismissed.

Healthcare consultant and platform developer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found he met minimum evidentiary criteria but did not demonstrate the sustained national or international acclaim and recognition required to place him among the small percentage at his field's top.

A rally racing athlete and entrepreneur sought extraordinary ability classification. After an earlier dismissed appeal, he filed a combined motion to reopen and reconsider. The AAO dismissed both, finding no new facts and no incorrect application of law or policy, only reargument of issues already considered.

A lead application developer in enterprise software and analytics sought EB-1A classification, claiming seven criteria. The service center accepted judging, scholarly articles and salary, then denied on final merits. The AAO agreed, finding the record did not show sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field standing, and dismissed the appeal.

A digital marketing and communications director claimed seven criteria for extraordinary ability. The AAO found only two criteria met: judging and scholarly articles. Even meeting two criteria, the petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim among the small percentage at the top. Appeal dismissed.

Training and development specialist sought NIW for STEM education framework under Dhanasar. Advanced degree established. First prong failed: while endeavor had substantial merit, record lacked evidence of national importance and broad prospective impact. Framework described as scalable and replicable without detail or demonstrated innovation. Second and third prongs not reached.

Marketing professional met initial evidentiary criteria with four categories. However, AAO found evidence insufficient for final merits determination of sustained acclaim and placement among very top of field. Record lacked degree of recognition required by statute. Appeal dismissed.

An employer petitioned for a technology entrepreneur seeking extraordinary ability (EB-1A). Claimed seven criteria initially; director found two met (judging, leading role). On appeal, petitioner claimed five others. AAO found awards and membership unmet and declined to analyze remaining criteria, reserving final merits because threshold initial evidence requirements not satisfied.

Civil engineer in occupational health and safety proposes a small wastewater consulting and construction company. Claimed endeavor has national importance under Dhanasar framework. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed specific endeavor lacks national importance despite wastewater management field having it; projections insufficient to demonstrate significant economic or employment impact.

Technology startup founder seeking EB-1A classification claimed eight evidentiary criteria; SCOPS found six met and AAO confirmed leading role criterion. However, AAO rejected the petition because sustained national or international acclaim was not demonstrated, with nearly all achievements from 2024-2025 and recognition limited to startup ecosystems, failing final merits review.

A veterinarian appealed motion to reopen extraordinary ability denial. The AAO dismissed the motion, finding no new facts warranting reopening. Though meeting three regulatory criteria at step one, the appellate decision properly found insufficient evidence of sustained acclaim and top percentage standing at step two.

Mathematical and electrical engineering researcher sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Motion to reopen granted on advanced degree issue but dismissed on merits. Proposed medical imaging research endeavor too vague at filing date; potential impacts on field and national initiatives lacked sufficient direct evidentiary support despite prior research accomplishments.

Aviation supply chain manager sought EB-2 NIW classification. The beneficiary claimed four exceptional ability criteria but met only one of six required regulatory criteria. The AAO rejected salary and professional association memberships as inadequately documented, finding the beneficiary ineligible for the underlying classification and thus declining to address the waiver prongs.

Founder and president of automotive parts wholesaler sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and NIW. Petitioner claimed academic record, ten years experience, license, and membership criteria. AAO found beneficiary met only one criterion, not the required three, so does not qualify for exceptional ability and NIW analysis not reached.

A business management specialist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The appeal was dismissed on procedural grounds: the Form I-290B was not properly signed, as the signature appeared to be copied, pasted, or stamp-created rather than a valid handwritten signature personally made by the petitioner.

Supply chain manager with advanced degree sought NIW. AAO affirmed dismissal because endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; impact limited to employing company and clients, without demonstrated broader industry or field implications.

A data scientist sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a public policy perception analysis endeavor using data-driven technologies. Although the specific endeavor had substantial merit, AAO agreed with USCIS that the petitioner failed to establish national importance. Proposed work would operate within single employer without broader field implications or substantial economic effects. Appeal dismissed.

A chief engineer in sustainable building filed a national interest waiver petition but submitted falsified reference letters. AAO found the petitioner willfully misrepresented material facts by knowingly submitting false documents, rendering him inadmissible. Appeal dismissed due to fraud and failure to meet all three Dhanasar prongs.