Published AAO appeal decisions

Martial arts studio petitioned for instructor beneficiary for O-1A extraordinary ability in athletics. Beneficiary met only one of three required initial criteria and could not establish sustained national or international acclaim; appeal dismissed.

An avionics engineer seeks NIW under EB-2. She proposed work in aircraft maintenance, training, and business development. The AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance because her training and engineering work would not impact the aviation industry beyond her employer and clients.

Physical therapist with valid license claimed national interest waiver for EB-2. Met initial exceptional ability criteria through degree, license, and professional memberships. AAO found petitioner lacks expertise significantly above field ordinary level and proposed endeavor lacks national importance beyond individual patient impact.

Legal consultant with advanced degree sought NIW. Director approved advanced degree qualification but denied NIW. AAO affirmed, finding proposed legal consulting work for Brazil–South America clients lacks national importance despite substantial merit, as it lacks broader field impact or substantial U.S. economic benefit.

Film, commercial, and music video producer and founding executive of production company seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner met three evidentiary criteria. AAO affirmed denial on final merits, finding insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim or position at the very top of the field.

Sustainable development professional sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed five criteria but established none. Did not prove receipt of recognized awards, published material about his work, or display at artistic venues. AAO found no sustained national or international acclaim or evidence of rising to very top of field, dismissing appeal.

Writer and filmmaker claimed five criteria; Director found only two met (awards and published material). On appeal, petitioner asserted judging, original contributions, and artistic display additionally applied. AAO rejected judging for insufficient documentation of jury participation details. Evidence did not show sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.

Professional auto racing team petitioned for an engineer employed since 2016. Petitioner met three evidentiary criteria but AAO found the totality of evidence insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or position among the very top of the field of automotive engineering.

An entrepreneur seeking EB-2 NIW classification failed to establish advanced degree status and exceptional ability. The AAO found his proposed endeavor in food service entrepreneurship and business advisory services lacked national importance. The specific work would not impact the field or restaurant industry broadly and showed no significant potential for U.S. job creation.

Entrepreneur with advanced degree sought NIW for proposed real estate and business holding company. AAO affirmed dismissal, finding the ventures lack the national importance required under Dhanasar's first prong. Submitted generalized economic articles did not demonstrate substantial positive economic effects rising to national importance level.

Visual artist and illustrator claiming extraordinary ability. Met two of ten criteria but failed to meet three required. Leading role and high salary claims rejected due to lack of organization documentation and insufficient earnings evidence. Record showed skilled artist with recognition but not sustained acclaim at required level.

Education administrator with foreign master's degree and baccalaureate sought EB-2 advanced degree or exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed director finding petitioner lacked five years progressive experience in specialty and failed three exceptional ability criteria; did not reach waiver analysis.

General and operations manager applied for NIW under EB-2 with advanced degree. Petitioner proposed consulting services for general operations management and entrepreneurship. AAO affirmed Director's finding that while work had substantial merit, it lacked national importance; no evidence showed broader field impact or substantial positive economic effects for U.S. economy.

Information technology professional sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to meet exceptional ability requirement (at least three of six criteria). Petitioner met only two criteria; did not establish license, comparable evidence, high salary, or recognition by peers. National interest waiver analysis not reached due to lack of prerequisite EB-2 qualification.

A recruitment consultant with an advanced degree sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed the petitioner qualifies as an advanced degree professional but found the proposed recruitment work, though having substantial merit, lacks national importance without sufficient documentary evidence of prospective broader economic impact.

A Chinese company manager petitioned for EB-1A classification claiming extraordinary ability. The applicant met two criteria (published material and leading role) but not the three required. On appeal, the membership criterion was rejected because the associations did not require outstanding achievements. The appeal was dismissed.

International law attorney filed 15th combined motion to reopen and reconsider EB-1A denial. Motion fails procedural requirements for reopening; newly submitted evidence post-dates petition filing and does not demonstrate eligibility at time of filing. Prior dismissal affirmed across multiple motions. Motion dismissed.

A nurse seeks national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. She claimed her proposed nursing work has substantial merit and national importance. The AAO held the endeavor lacks national importance because it would only serve her immediate patients and employers, without demonstrating broader implications for nursing or healthcare fields as required.

IT specialist seeking NIW to fill gap in skilled professionals. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance; tentative job offers in project leadership lack documentary evidence of broader field impact beyond employer benefit.

An entrepreneur and real estate developer seeks NIW for EB-2 based on business development and project management skills in real estate. The AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance; developing 20 housing units in one Florida location does not have prospective impact commensurate with national importance or substantial positive economic effects.

Athlete and coach in combat sport claimed extraordinary ability through five evidentiary criteria. AAO found he met only the awards criterion but failed the published material and membership criteria. Lacking three qualifying criteria, petitioner did not satisfy initial evidence requirement and did not demonstrate sustained acclaim at the top of the field.

Mental health assistant sought NIW as EB-2 exceptional ability individual. AAO affirmed petitioner failed to meet three evidentiary criteria required for exceptional ability, lacking official academic records, relevant degree, and salary documentation. Dhanasar framework analysis not reached.

Media production agency petitioned for O-1A classification for senior vice president of production finance. AAO dismissed motions, finding only one criterion met and insufficient documentation of membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.

A physical education specialist met three evidentiary criteria but failed the final merits analysis. The AAO found his peer review experience, publication record, and conference participation insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim among the top tier.

An entrepreneur claiming exceptional ability and NIW sought to provide IT and business services. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding his proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance and would not impact the IT industry broadly or create substantial economic effects.