Published AAO appeal decisions

An electric car system engineer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. He claimed advanced degree eligibility and proposed future employment or business ventures in vehicle systems. The AAO affirmed denial, finding he failed to identify a specific, clearly-defined endeavor with substantial merit and national importance; broad industry growth alone does not satisfy Dhanasar.

A marketing manager sought NIW as EB-2. The AAO found he lacked the advanced degree requirement and failed the first Dhanasar prong: his proposed marketing work lacked national importance despite general industry need. Appeal dismissed.

Finance manager sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. Service center found advanced degree qualification but denied waiver. Petitioner asserted national importance through financial management benefits and community financial literacy. AAO held proposed work lacked national importance under Dhanasar first prong and dismissed appeal.

Financial manager seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver. Proposed work involves financial management for private security company. Failed first Dhanasar prong: insufficient evidence that proposed financial management work has national importance, broader field implications, significant job creation potential, or substantial positive economic effects. Appeal dismissed.

A postsecondary education administrator sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. She claimed advanced degree eligibility and intended to continue education administration work, proposing benefits to higher education broadly. The AAO affirmed denial, finding no evidence her specific endeavor extends beyond individual employers to affect the field or system at a national level.

Oral and maxillofacial surgeon sought national interest waiver for EB-2 classification as academic surgeon teaching and mentoring residents. Petitioner met advanced degree requirement but failed to establish national importance of proposed endeavor. Professional shortage and absence of female role models in field insufficient to demonstrate national impact beyond patients and trainees. Appeal dismissed.

A taekwondo athlete and coach with exceptional ability sought NIW for continued coaching and competition. The AAO dismissed because his proposed work lacked national importance; coaching at club level would not impact the sport broadly enough to meet Dhanasar's first prong.

Self-petitioner marketing and management professional seeking NIW for small business consulting startup in Florida. Claimed substantial merit and national importance under Dhanasar. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed consulting work lacks national importance; insufficient evidence of substantial economic benefits beyond company and future clientele.

Food scientist with bachelor's degree equivalent seeking NIW for food safety and production work. AAO affirmed denial because proposed work, though meritorious, lacks national importance. Impact limited to specific employers; no evidence of broader field or economic effects.

An IT marketing professional sought EB-2 national interest waiver classification. The petitioner argued her marketing and consulting work had national importance under Dhanasar. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the specific endeavor lacked sufficient national importance or projected economic impact, and did not analyze the remaining Dhanasar prongs.

Process engineer sought national interest waiver under Dhanasar framework. Petitioner qualified as advanced degree holder but failed first prong. Work involved process engineering for employer clients, not broader implications for field or national economy. No sufficient evidence of projected U.S. job creation or substantial economic effects.

Electrical power network communications engineer seeks national interest waiver for EB-2 classification to strengthen U.S. power grid. AAO found first prong met but dismissed appeal because petitioner lacked sufficient evidence of being well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor under second Dhanasar prong.

A biomedical researcher sought EB-2 NIW classification under the Dhanasar framework. The AAO found the proposed research had substantial merit and national importance, but concluded the petitioner failed to demonstrate she was well positioned to advance the research, precluding NIW eligibility.

Human resources manager seeking EB-2 NIW to continue HR career with various employers. Petitioner claimed substantial merit and national importance of proposed endeavor. AAO held first Dhanasar prong unmet: HR management lacks national importance and does not impact field or economy broadly; second and third prongs not reached.

Organic chemistry researcher sought national interest waiver for EB-2. AAO dismissed because although the proposed endeavor met the first prong for substantial merit and national importance, petitioner failed to establish being well positioned to advance it under the second prong.

Entrepreneur seeks NIW for EB-2 to develop fitness training equipment company. Petitioner claimed endeavor had national importance by promoting economic development and exports. AAO held proposed work failed Dhanasar prong one: insufficient evidence showed national importance or substantial economic benefits beyond the company itself. Appeal dismissed.

Financial applications consultant with advanced degree seeks NIW under Dhanasar framework. Claimed proposed financial consulting work has national importance with federal government impact. AAO found petitioner failed first prong: proposed work lacks demonstrated national importance, specific projects, or substantial U.S. economic effects beyond employer and clients.

Semiconductor research engineer sought NIW for EB-2 advanced degree. Petitioner demonstrated advanced degree but failed to establish national importance of proposed digital hardware and semiconductor memory engineering work. AAO found work lacked sufficient prospective impact on field or U.S. economy broadly and provided no evidence of substantial job creation or economic effects.

A healthcare data analyst with Master of Public Health sought NIW for healthcare research focusing on chronic disease prevention. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit but denied waiver because petitioner failed to demonstrate being well positioned to advance research through funding, citations, or leadership role.

Engineering manager sought EB-2 national interest waiver for production engineering role in automotive manufacturing. AAO found the work, though valuable, lacked sufficient national importance as her proposed endeavor would not impact the field or industry broadly beyond her employer.

A sterilization supervisor with an advanced degree sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for infection control management work. The AAO dismissed, finding his proposed endeavor lacked national importance because it would benefit only his employers and their patients, not the field or healthcare industry broadly.

Physician researcher in cardiovascular medicine with advanced degree seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. AAO found proposed research has substantial merit and national importance but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish being well positioned to advance the proposed research endeavor.

An employer petitioned for an EB-2 national interest waiver for a process engineer with a Ph.D. in chemistry. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the beneficiary's proposed process engineering work lacked national importance despite the employer's significant business scale, as the work would not impact the industry broadly.

Healthcare and life sciences management specialist holding advanced degree sought national interest waiver of job offer requirement. Director approved advanced degree classification but denied waiver. AAO found proposed endeavor lacks substantial merit at national level because it extends only to employer and clients without broader field impact. Appeal dismissed.

A physician and neuropathology researcher sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for neurodegenerative disease research. The AAO found the research met the first prong: substantial merit and national importance. However, the second prong failed due to insufficient evidence of positioning to advance the research. Appeal dismissed.