Published AAO appeal decisions

Mechanical engineer researcher self-petitioner sought NIW under EB-2 for thermal battery development research. AAO affirmed first prong met but reversed on second prong, finding PhD degree and citations insufficient to demonstrate she is well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.

Financial manager with eight years finance and four years management experience in Kazakhstan sought extraordinary ability classification claiming seven criteria. AAO found only judging criterion met (from SCOPS). Rejected awards, membership, original contributions, scholarly articles, and exhibitions. Appeal dismissed due to insufficient criteria satisfaction.

A legal consultant sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO held that the petitioner did not meet any of the ten evidentiary criteria and failed the threshold initial evidence requirement, so a final merits determination was not reached.

Fitness trainer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met two of ten regulatory criteria: published material and leading critical role. Claimed membership, original contributions, scholarly articles, and commercial success but AAO found none satisfied. Without three criteria met, final merits analysis not reached.

A software quality assurance engineer met three initial evidentiary criteria for EB-1A extraordinary ability. However, the final merits determination found the record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that petitioner was in the small percentage at the very top of the field, so appeal was dismissed.

A chief executive officer with a medical degree sought EB-2 classification and NIW for a healthcare startup. The proposed endeavor met substantial merit but lacked demonstrated national importance. Projections lacked detail; techniques were not shown as sufficiently innovative or distinct; no broad field impact or employment of disadvantaged workers established.

Content developer and influencer from Brazil sought extraordinary ability classification. Claimed six criteria. Decision found only one criterion met and withdrew SCOPS finding on exhibitions. Appeal dismissed because petitioner failed to satisfy three required criteria.

Software developer sought NIW with advanced degree. Proposed autonomous vehicle safety research. AAO found petitioner not well positioned to advance proposed endeavor under Dhanasar second prong: master's degree and citations insufficient without prior funding, government interest, or validated model comparable to Dhanasar precedent. First and third prongs reserved.

Commercial pilot from Panama sought NIW for EB-2. AAO held petitioner failed to establish exceptional ability: only two criteria met (degree and license), not three required. Insufficient evidence of ten years experience, exceptional salary, professional association membership, or industry recognition. Underlying visa eligibility denied; NIW not analyzed.

Postdoctoral fellow in biomedical research sought EB-2 NIW with advanced degree. Proposed cancer research endeavor met substantial merit and national importance, but AAO found petitioner not well positioned to advance it: lacking significant funded grant record, evidence of work adoption by others, or comprehensive future plan despite strong academic credentials.

A physiotherapist sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed that the petitioner failed to meet the underlying EB-2 exceptional ability requirement at the final merits stage, despite satisfying three initial criteria. Because eligibility for the underlying classification was not established, NIW analysis was waived and the appeal was dismissed.

An IT consultant sought EB-2 with national interest waiver to establish a consultancy serving the pharmaceutical industry. The AAO affirmed dismissal because his business plan, though showing substantial merit, lacked sufficient evidence that the methodology had been adopted in industry or would significantly benefit the national economy.

Lawyer seeks NIW for EB-2 classification to establish immigration law firm providing legal services to immigrants. AAO found proposed endeavor lacked national importance; petitioner did not demonstrate how services would differ from existing firms or impact field broadly; appeal dismissed.

An attorney sought EB-2 NIW classification for fire safety compliance work. SCOPS initially approved but revoked, finding no national importance. AAO affirmed dismissal, holding that working in an important field alone is insufficient; petitioner must show proposed endeavor's prospective impact reaches national importance level.

Research scientist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for developing artificial intelligence technologies. Decision found proposed endeavor lacks sufficient detail and evidence to establish prospective national importance. Appeal dismissed on first prong failure.

A photojournalist claims extraordinary ability in EB-1A. The AAO found SCOPS' decision contained factual errors and insufficient analysis, requiring remand. The decision lacked detailed consideration of evidence and failed to address all claimed criteria, warranting re-evaluation by SCOPS.

AI researcher sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for research on information retrieval and natural language processing. SCOPS initially approved then revoked. AAO sustained appeal, finding petitioner established national importance of endeavor, demonstrated requisite expertise, and proved waiver would benefit the United States.

Senior legal advisor with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Service center denied without analyzing evidence against Dhanasar framework. AAO remanded because service center failed to discuss evidence, identify insufficiencies, or explain conclusions for any of the three prongs required for meaningful appellate review.

International legal advisor in business consulting seeks EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner claimed endeavor had national importance through ecosystem strengthening and cross-border business benefits. AAO held first Dhanasar prong unmet: proposed endeavor lacks documented national importance; cited evidence addresses general field trends, not specific endeavor impact; insufficient proof of substantial economic benefits.

Masonry and stone restoration specialist with advanced degree equivalent sought NIW for sustainable historic preservation work. Remanded because SCOPS did not determine if proposed job requires advanced degree professional and failed to explain national importance finding adequately.

AI researcher seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver claimed substantial merit, national importance, positioning to advance, and balance favoring waiver under Dhanasar. AAO found first prong met but rejected second and third prongs: petitioner lacks completed degree, secured funding, or concrete employment plans; waiver not shown beneficial to United States.

A cybersecurity specialist seeks NIW as an EB-2 advanced degree professional. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner did not possess an advanced degree at filing and the proposed endeavor—personal career advancement—lacks the national importance required under the first Dhanasar prong.

Senior cloud security architect petitioned for EB-2 NIW by technology company. Petitioner claimed research on AI-driven cybersecurity architectures. AAO found substantial merit but insufficient specificity and no demonstrated national importance beyond employer and clients. Appeal dismissed.

A senior software engineer in automotive manufacturing sought NIW. Employer claimed the beneficiary's work on connected, efficient vehicles serves national interests. AAO found industry and STEM importance insufficient; specific prospective impact of individual's role was not demonstrated.