Published AAO appeal decisions

Electronics engineer in telecommunications seeks NIW for EB-2 self-employment in fiber optic services. Petitioner claimed national importance based on Federal Fiber to Home alignment. AAO dismissed, finding the specific endeavor lacks national importance despite working in important field; general industry alignment insufficient without evidence of broader prospective impact.

Computer scientist specializing in bioinformatics employed by technology company sought EB-2 with NIW. AAO dismissed because evidence demonstrated field importance but failed to establish national importance of petitioner's specific proposed research endeavor or its prospective impact under Dhanasar.

A lawyer sought EB-2 national interest waiver (NIW). He initially stated vague intent to continue studies and practice, then materially changed his proposed endeavor on appeal to establish a legal consulting and education business. The AAO dismissed because he did not establish a specific proposed endeavor at filing, and changed proposals cannot cure defects.

An electrician in industrial maintenance and automation sought NIW as EB-2 member of professions. AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor lacks national importance under Dhanasar. Individual company consultancy services lack sufficient scale, employment potential, or economic effects to rise to national level.

An assistant research scientist in medical entomology sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the applicant met only two of the required three initial evidentiary criteria and failed to establish membership, published material, or original contributions.

Petitioner with high school diploma and two-year accounting diploma sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner failed to qualify as advanced degree professional because a two-year diploma plus work experience does not equal a bachelor's degree; experience cannot substitute for the required four-year baccalaureate degree.

Entrepreneur who co-founded ventures in Georgia sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found petitioner met three initial criteria after identifying leading or critical role role not credited by SCOPS. Decision remanded for final merits determination regarding sustained national or international acclaim.

Chief financial officer sought EB-2 national interest waiver for credit recovery services business with machine learning technology. AAO affirmed SCOPS denial, finding petitioner failed national importance prong despite business plans. Unsupported employment projections and lack of evidence showing technology improvements or national economic significance precluded eligibility.

A software engineer and systems researcher sought an NIW for autonomous vehicle research. The AAO found substantial merit in the proposed endeavor but dismissed the appeal because the petitioner failed to demonstrate he was well positioned to advance it, lacking evidence of progress or external support.

An employer petitioned for a quality assurance manager in aerospace manufacturing, seeking EB-2 advanced degree classification with a national interest waiver. The service center denied it. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding the endeavor lacked national importance because its impact was confined to the employer and economic benefits were too attenuated, so other prongs were not reached.

An automotive service technician sought NIW for an exceptional ability business endeavor. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed automotive repair venture lacked national importance despite its focus on important industry challenges; benefits were too localized to the petitioner's company.

Martial arts academy petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability for Muay Thai coach beneficiary. AAO dismissed appeal, finding athlete failed to meet three regulatory criteria required for extraordinary ability. Athletic awards, team affiliations, and media coverage did not establish excellence or acclaim in coaching field specifically.

A mathematician with a Ph.D. sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for mathematical research with government initiative alignment. The AAO agreed the proposed endeavor meets the first Dhanasar prong but found the petitioner is not well-positioned to advance it due to unclear employment status, unclear research duties, and insufficient evidence of available funding and institutional support.

Health services manager with advanced nursing degree seeking EB-2 classification and NIW for proposed healthcare business claimed national importance based on federal alignment, job creation projections, and revenue forecasts. AAO found proposed endeavor lacks national importance because benefits do not extend beyond individual patients to impact healthcare field broadly.

Ph.D. civil engineering student sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for railway safety and cybersecurity work. AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor insufficiently defined through multiple inconsistent characterizations; petitioner's actual employment plans contradicted stated endeavor, preventing assessment of national importance.

A lawyer and mediator from abroad sought extraordinary ability classification. The service center denied the petition because her occupation allegedly fell outside the statutory fields and it never analyzed the regulatory criteria. The AAO found her intended work to be in business, withdrew the denial, and remanded for a full criterion-by-criterion decision.

Restaurant company seeking to employ beneficiary to lead expansion across United States. Claimed expansion creates thousands of jobs in economically distressed areas and promotes cultural exchange. AAO held specific endeavor lacks national importance; job projections unsubstantiated; 19 jobs per location insufficient; market demand unproven.

An operations research analyst with a PhD sought an EB-2 NIW for data-driven research in supply chain and financial markets. The AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate her specific endeavor's national importance, confusing the importance of the field with the importance of her proposed work.

Petitioner appealed dismissal of motion to reopen and reconsider prior NIW denial. AAO held appeal concerns only procedural motion dismissal not underlying petition denial; petitioner waived substantive arguments by not appealing original denial and failing to articulate legal error in motion dismissal.

Aerospace researcher claimed five evidentiary criteria for extraordinary ability. AAO found she met fewer than three criteria required and lacked sustained national or international acclaim at the top of her field, dismissing the appeal.

A site reliability engineer sought EB-1A classification. Four criteria were deemed waived, and the AAO withdrew the service center's favorable findings on judging and leading role, then rejected membership and original contributions. With fewer than three criteria met, the appeal was dismissed and final merits reserved.

A property management company sponsored a graphic designer under the EB-2 advanced degree category, not a national interest waiver. After approval was revoked for lack of intent to employ full-time and inability to pay, the AAO found those grounds unsupported but noted missing ability-to-pay evidence for the priority date year, and remanded.

A business executive planning a digital data analysis services company sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO found the applicant failed to establish three of ten initial criteria. Membership claims lacked evidence that the associations required outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts. The appeal was dismissed without reaching final merits.

An environmental science professor and researcher specializing in soil conservation and AI-powered monitoring systems sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner met only two criteria (judging and scholarly articles) and failed to establish the required three; final merits determination also failed.

An EB-2 applicant seeking national interest waiver filed a third motion to reconsider after prior dismissals. The AAO dismissed the motion because petitioner merely disagreed with conclusions without identifying legal or policy errors as required for reconsideration. Underlying petition remained denied.