Published AAO appeal decisions

Aircraft mechanic seeking EB-2 NIW claimed training programs and maintenance improvements would address aviation mechanic shortage with national importance. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor lacks sufficient national importance and would not impact field broadly beyond individual trainees or employers.

A petitioner in cybersecurity and IT governance filed a motion to reopen a dismissed NIW petition. The AAO dismissed the motion, finding the new executive orders and strategic documents did not establish new facts warranting reconsideration, as they did not address errors in prior dismissals or demonstrate changed circumstances.

Business consultant self-petitioner claimed six extraordinary ability criteria. AAO dismissed motion to reconsider, upholding prior findings that published material, original contributions, and scholarly articles criteria were not met. Membership and leading role criteria were reserved as unnecessary since three criteria minimum was not satisfied.

A staff product manager with advanced degree sought NIW for privacy-centric advertising work. AAO dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that her specific endeavor had national importance beyond her employer's operations, lacking evidence of industry adoption, technology transfer, or broader societal or economic impact.

A barber and entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW to establish a barbershop and school. The AAO dismissed a third motion to reopen and reconsider, finding the petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance of the endeavor and did not meet criteria for exceptional ability; new industry articles about barber shops did not specifically address this applicant's particular proposed endeavor.

A computer scientist developing driver monitoring technology sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor, though meritorious, lacks national importance because the record does not establish broader prospective impact beyond the employer or adoption by other manufacturers.

A singer-composer self-petitioned for EB-1A. Demonstrated two criteria: lesser awards and exhibition display. Failed to establish three required criteria. AAO affirmed denial because the evidentiary threshold was not met, reserving final merits analysis.

A fitness and health professional with advanced degree seeks EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. Petitioner proposed fitness training endeavor. Service center and AAO found no national importance because business plan lacked specificity and independent evidence, and proposed work would impact only clients, not the industry broadly.

Aviation consultant seeks EB-2 with national interest waiver. Claimed proposed company would provide economic revitalization, employment, and advance aviation safety. AAO held endeavor lacks national importance: limited employment potential, no evidence of industry-wide impact, and unsubstantiated claims about safety and sustainability.

Mechanical engineer with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for semiconductor manufacturing advancement. Service center denied without adequate explanation of Dhanasar prongs analysis. AAO remanded for new decision because service center failed to explain rationale and adequately address petitioner's proposed endeavor rather than employment position.

Technology entrepreneur with advanced degree seeks NIW for AI-driven cognitive decision support tools for aerospace and aviation. AAO withdrew director's finding on national importance prong, agreeing technology aligns with government priorities. However, petitioner failed to demonstrate record of success as executive or sufficient qualification to lead endeavor as CEO/CTO.

Engineer seeking NIW for electrical engineering consulting startup. Petitioner claimed endeavor had national importance for energy systems and sustainability. AAO dismissed motion, finding articles showed field importance but not specific endeavor impact or prospective national significance.

A graduate research and teaching assistant in computer science sought an EB-2 national interest waiver for AI research in medical diagnostics. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding he did not satisfy the second Dhanasar prong because he lacked adequate graduate credentials, strong publication records, secured research positions, or demonstrated funding.

Tattoo studio petitioned for O-1A classification for tattoo artist beneficiary. AAO determined beneficiary met at least three evidentiary criteria despite SCOPS finding only two. Decision withdrawn and remanded for SCOPS to evaluate totality of evidence and determine whether beneficiary demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim in the arts.

Medical researcher with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for EB-2. AAO held proposed research has substantial merit and national importance but petitioner not well positioned to advance it, lacking documented plan, prior success in similar efforts, or evidence of led funded research projects.

An industrial production management consultant self-petitioning for EB-2 NIW sought to establish a consulting business providing operational efficiency services. The AAO affirmed denial because the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance beyond local business impacts and employment projections, failing the first Dhanasar prong.

Registered nurse with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for preventive healthcare program in rural and underserved communities but failed first Dhanasar prong; while addressing important public health need, proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance or broader field implications required by precedent.

An assistant professor in classics sought a national interest waiver for EB-2 classification. The AAO held the proposed endeavor—study of ancient inscriptions, preservation of epigraphical resources, and classics teaching—has substantial merit but lacks the requisite national importance under Dhanasar's first prong, and did not address the remaining prongs.

Technology company petitioning for cofounder and CEO claiming extraordinary ability in technology entrepreneurship. Required three of eight criteria; met only one. AAO held venture funding, Forbes membership, and website articles insufficient under O-1A requirements.

A quantum chemist self-petitioned for EB-1A extraordinary ability. The AAO remanded the case, finding he met three initial criteria including original contributions, and instructed the service center to conduct final merits determination on totality of evidence.

A truck and heavy machinery mechanic sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed a motion to reopen and reconsider, finding the petitioner did not meet three required criteria and that the mechanic field may not fall within statutory parameters for this visa category.

A petitioner sought NIW EB-2 classification but the service center denied it without adequately analyzing the evidence. The AAO remanded, finding the service center did not properly discuss the petitioner's detailed endeavor description, did not evaluate factors in totality for the second prong, and did not adequately weigh considerations for the third prong.

CEO of automobile detailing and product retail company claims NIW for business expansion to New Jersey and California. AAO held endeavor lacks national importance; vague expansion plans without specific locations prevent establishing significant employment or economic effects.