Published AAO appeal decisions

Gymnastics coach sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed five criteria; AAO found only judging criterion met. Appeal dismissed because petitioner failed to establish three required criteria and lacks sustained national or international acclaim at top of field.

A customs broker and CEO sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability with a national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed denial of both requests, finding the petitioner failed the first Dhanasar prong; while the aviation industry is important, his specific endeavor lacks national importance and his claimed economic benefits lack sufficient evidentiary support.

Cybersecurity professional seeking EB-2 exceptional ability with NIW. Proposed founding cybersecurity consulting business. AAO affirmed denial: endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; government strategy references address field broadly, not petitioner's specific proposed work.

A dentist and entrepreneur sought EB-2 classification with NIW. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner's dental degree was not a doctoral degree as required; dentistry customarily requires a DDS or DMD. Because the underlying EB-2 classification was not established, the NIW was not addressed.

Sports industry professional sought EB-2 NIW for business venture. AAO dismissed appeal, finding no demonstrated national importance under Dhanasar's first prong. Petitioner conflated industry importance with specific endeavor impact; failed to show company would operate at national scale or generate substantial economic effects.

Chief executive and entrepreneur with advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Qualified for underlying advanced degree classification. AAO held proposed endeavor lacked national importance under first Dhanasar prong: petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial U.S. economic impact, job creation, or broader field implications beyond personal work with selected companies and clients.

Author sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO dismissed, finding petitioner satisfied fewer than three initial regulatory criteria; withdrew published material finding and rejected high salary claim, concluding overall record lacks evidence of sustained acclaim required for top-tier classification.

An airline pilot sought a national interest waiver under the Dhanasar framework, relying on the shortage of pilots and the importance of aviation. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the proposed endeavor, though meritorious, was not shown to have national importance. The other two prongs were reserved.

An accounting specialist entrepreneur sought EB-2 national interest waiver to hire forty-four employees. The AAO affirmed denial under Dhanasar's first prong: while the endeavor has substantial merit, it lacks national importance. The petitioner failed to show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects beyond her company.

Foreign language teacher and entrepreneur seeking NIW for specialized educational center serving children with learning difficulties. Claimed job creation and tax benefits demonstrate national importance. AAO found endeavor lacks broader implications extending beyond company and clientele to impact field or economy at national level.

A real estate broker sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed appeal on procedural grounds: petitioner failed to address errors in the Director's motion dismissal decision. On substantive review, salary evidence showed above-average earnings but lacked comprehensive comparative data required.

A financial manager and entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW status to establish a mining equipment sales company. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar's first prong because indirect economic effects and HUBZone status were insufficient to demonstrate substantial positive national economic impact.

A financial administrator sought NIW for EB-2 advanced degree classification. The AAO affirmed that although the proposed endeavor had substantial merit, it lacked national importance under Dhanasar because her advisory services would not impact the field or nation broadly. Appeal dismissed.

Commercial pilot seeks EB-2 NIW to work in aviation and pilot training. AAO dismissed appeal because proposed endeavor lacks national importance; general economic benefits and labor shortage mitigation insufficient under Dhanasar; second and third prongs not reached.

An attorney from Brazil seeks EB-2 with national interest waiver in tax and business law. The AAO found the petitioner did not qualify as an advanced degree professional or individual of exceptional ability, lacking required documentation and failing final merits review. Without underlying EB-2 eligibility, the NIW claim was not addressed.

Telecommunications consultant seeking EB-2 NIW. Petitioner self-filed. AAO found substantial merit but not national importance; evidence showed expertise and past accomplishments but not prospective impact on field or economy at national level.

Entrepreneur seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver to develop a business venture. Petitioner claimed substantial merit and national importance based on business plan, support letters, and documentary evidence. AAO dismissed because the proposed endeavor lacks national importance beyond the immediate employer and customers; descriptions conflicted with Form I-140.

Financial manager and entrepreneur sought EB-2 NIW for business work. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor lacked sufficient evidence demonstrating national importance, broader economic impact, or substantial job creation at level required by Dhanasar framework.

Music event producer claimed six extraordinary ability criteria. Director found only judging criterion met. Petitioner appealed with new evidence on awards, original contributions, and exhibitions. AAO affirmed dismissal: awards lacked field recognition, exhibitions were not artistic in nature, and only one criterion met precluded the three-criterion threshold.

Business consultant with advanced degree seeks EB-2 national interest waiver to operate consulting company serving small and medium enterprises. Petitioner claimed economic growth and government alignment. AAO held national importance unmet; personal statements and business plan lack sufficient evidence of broader field implications or substantial positive economic effects.

Foreign legal consultant seeking EB-2 NIW claimed advanced degree or exceptional ability. AAO held petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 eligibility because master's degree awarded after filing and insufficient progressive experience documented at filing. National interest waiver analysis reserved.

Software developer sought NIW for self-proposed endeavor in software optimization and later cryptocurrency/robo-advisor services. AAO dismissed appeal because proposed endeavor lacks national importance; material changes to scope were not properly established; and petitioner lacked expertise in modified areas.

Accountant with advanced degree sought NIW for providing accounting and auditing services to prospective clients. AAO found substantial merit but rejected national importance claim, finding no evidence of broad field impact, realistic business viability, or substantial employment and economic benefits.

Foreign trade specialist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance because evidence shows only limited benefits to specific employer clients, not broader industry implications or significant employment and economic effects.

Telematics systems engineer and CEO of tracking technology company. Self-petitioner seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met three of seven claimed criteria but failed final merits determination; lacked sustained national or international acclaim required for top-tier classification.