Published AAO appeal decisions

Business professional sought EB-1A classification. Met published material criterion through professional articles discussing achievements. Failed to meet awards and leading role criteria. Overall record does not demonstrate achievements placing petitioner significantly above others at national or international level.

A scientist in life sciences sought EB-1A classification claiming receipt of a research fellowship. The AAO found the fellowship did not evidence extraordinary ability because it targets young, mid-career scientists from developing countries and does not demonstrate excellence or top-tier status.

Agricultural specialist in hybrid rice production sought EB-1A classification. Claimed awards criterion through scholarship and job appointment. AAO found scholarship lacks evidence of elite recognition and job appointment does not qualify. Overall record fails to demonstrate sustained acclaim placing petitioner at very top of field.

Petitioner sought EB-1A classification. Claimed awards, membership, and published material criteria. AAO found award was local not national; association does not require outstanding achievement; online articles lack evidence of major media status. Overall record fails to demonstrate sustained acclaim at very top level.

A designer claimed extraordinary ability through professional membership, published materials, and exhibition participation. The AAO found membership requirements did not reflect outstanding achievement, published materials lacked documentation in major venues, and exhibition claims were unsupported by evidence. Appeal dismissed for failure to meet top-tier acclaim.

A circus performer claimed extraordinary ability through a second-place award in a national Brazilian circus festival. The AAO held the award not nationally or internationally recognized as required and noted participation invitations alone do not demonstrate top-tier status. Appeal dismissed for insufficient acclaim.

A chef claimed extraordinary ability through awards, publications, and high salary. The AAO found awards not nationally or internationally recognized, publications lacked proper documentation and primary focus, claimed accomplishments spanned only one month, and salary evidence was insufficient. Petition denied for failure to demonstrate sustained top-level acclaim.

Scientist claimed extraordinary ability via three criteria: awards, membership, and judging. AAO found membership ineligible due to timing and awards insufficient, declined separate judging analysis, and concluded petitioner showed no sustained national or international acclaim at field's highest level.

Restaurant employer petitioned to employ sushi chef as extraordinary ability alien. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner submitted no evidence meeting regulatory criteria and beneficiary did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for classification.

A researcher in life sciences at Columbia University sought EB-1A classification for extraordinary ability. The AAO upheld the judging criterion but withdrew the director's finding on scholarly articles and found neither awards nor the overall record demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim or placement in the very top of the field. Appeal dismissed.

An artist with counsel sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Awards did not meet standards; membership organizations lacked outstanding achievement requirements; publications were not about the artist; exhibitions were sporadic and early-dated. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding insufficient evidence of sustained acclaim at the highest level.

A chemist filed a self-petition for EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The director denied the petition for insufficient sustained acclaim evidence. The petitioner failed to address the director's specific findings or identify legal errors on appeal, so the AAO summarily dismissed the appeal without analyzing criteria.

An employer sponsored a beneficiary for EB-1A extraordinary ability in music education. The beneficiary did not meet multiple criteria; letters and certificates were insufficient evidence of sustained acclaim at the highest level. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the beneficiary had not distinguished herself above others nationally or internationally.

A karate instructor with counsel representation sought EB-1A classification. Rank promotions and competitive results from 1990s-2003 did not meet awards criteria. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding no sustained national or international acclaim and no evidence of intent to continue competing in the United States.

A self-represented petitioner claimed extraordinary ability in the sciences, and the director found sustained acclaim was not shown. The appeal form's basis section was blank and the promised brief and evidence never arrived. The AAO dismissed it summarily for failing to identify any error. No criteria were analyzed.

Professional cyclist and coach sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO found petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim; regional race wins and local team memberships insufficient to show extraordinary ability at the very top of the field.

Petitioner in sciences sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Director denied for lack of sustained national or international acclaim. AAO found petitioner met at least three regulatory criteria and that totality of evidence established sustained national acclaim and extraordinary ability warranting approval.

Violin performer and teacher claimed three criteria: awards, membership, and published material. The AAO found the awards insufficient because they were institution-limited or decade-old, memberships did not require outstanding achievement, and articles were not primarily about the petitioner or in major media. Overall, evidence showed talent but not sustained national or international acclaim at the top of the field.

Seafood industry specialist claimed awards and published material criteria. The AAO found nomination without receipt of award insufficient, and abstracts or articles with limited focus on petitioner did not meet the published material criterion. Overall evidence failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim at the field's top.

Social worker and women's rights advocate claimed awards, membership, published material, and high salary criteria. The AAO rejected awards as decade-old and organizationally-based, membership as lacking outstanding achievement requirements, articles as incompletely translated, and salary as not clearly tied to social work. Evidence insufficient for sustained national or international acclaim.

Track and field coach sought EB-1A classification for extraordinary ability in athletics, citing coaching achievements and participant Olympic medals. The AAO rejected the awards criterion as the petitioner coached rather than personally won major awards, found published material inadmissible because post-filed, and held overall evidence insufficient for sustained national or international acclaim at the field's top.

A video game professional satisfied three extraordinary ability criteria. The AAO found published material in major outlets, judging involvement through academy delegation, and overall pattern of sustained national acclaim. Evidence supported that petitioner's entry would benefit the United States.

A wrestler sought extraordinary ability classification. The AAO reviewed six criteria but found no evidence supporting any. Petitioner submitted no documentation of awards, membership, publications, or leadership roles. Evidence failed to demonstrate sustained national acclaim or that petitioner stood among the very top in the field.

A petitioner claimed extraordinary ability in the arts, and the director found sustained acclaim was not shown. On appeal counsel only asserted in general terms that the director erred and submitted nothing further. The AAO summarily dismissed the appeal for failing to identify a specific error. No criteria were analyzed.

A dancer and choreographer sought extraordinary ability classification. She claimed three criteria: awards, membership, and published materials. The AAO found none met: youth awards do not show top-field status, association membership criteria unproven, and materials lacked major media publication. Overall evidence showed talent but insufficient sustained acclaim.