AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
6,586 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-1AFinance and economicsApr 2025Dismissed
Investment banker self-petitioner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO affirmed Service Center denial, finding petitioner failed to establish three required criteria: association membership, leading role, and published material were unsupported or waived on appeal.
0 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurshipApr 2025Dismissed
Entrepreneur seeking EB-2 with national interest waiver for establishing engineering solutions company for automotive sector claimed substantial merit and national importance. AAO dismissed because the endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance beyond company and clients.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementApr 2025Dismissed
A consultant and business analyst, who first sought a national interest waiver, claimed three extraordinary ability criteria: membership, original contributions and leading role. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the membership claim rested on training certifications, not qualifying association membership, making three criteria impossible. It reserved the other two criteria.
0 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWHealthcare, clinicalApr 2025Dismissed
Aesthetician seeks EB-2 national interest waiver for aesthetics clinic in Florida. AAO affirmed first prong fails because proposed endeavor lacks national importance; impact limited to local clients and employees without broader implications for field or economy. Reserved remaining prongs.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementApr 2025Dismissed
General operations manager of cleaning and sanitizing products company claims NIW for business expansion and consulting services. AAO affirmed finding that endeavor lacks national importance; insufficient specificity on operations, staffing, and economic impact.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEnergy and climateApr 2025Dismissed
An electro-mechanical professional in hydrocarbon extraction sought EB-2 national interest waiver to work in the petroleum industry. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding that the proposed endeavor lacked national importance despite the industry's significance, as the petitioner failed to demonstrate broader impact beyond a specific employer.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIApr 2025Dismissed
Product manager sponsored by employer for EB-2 with NIW. Claimed proposed endeavor in cloud gaming analytics has substantial merit and national importance. AAO held endeavor lacks national importance because benefits are limited to specific employer despite national footprint; working in important field insufficient; labor certification process addresses STEM shortages.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementApr 2025Dismissed
Professional in human resources consulting seeks NIW for EB-2 classification as advanced degree holder or exceptional ability. Claimed endeavor addresses workforce skills gap through training programs. AAO held endeavor lacks broader field impact and fails to demonstrate national importance required for NIW.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWSports and athleticsApr 2025Dismissed
Athlete and athletic trainer sought NIW for EB-2 to promote MMA in the US. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance: no showing of significant economic impact, industry growth alone insufficient, and techniques would not elevate field broadly. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWArts, design, architectureApr 2025Dismissed
An artistic producer seeks EB-2 NIW to establish arts education academy in Ohio with expansion plans to increase arts access and tourism. Petitioner established endeavor substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance despite claimed climate and diversity benefits.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementApr 2025Dismissed
A professional intending to become CEO of her own company sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding she did not meet the EB-2 advanced degree requirements and her business projections lacked evidence of economic significance at a national level needed for national importance.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWLife sciences and medicineApr 2025Dismissed
Toxicologist sponsored by employer for research in health and safety risk assessment sought national interest waiver. AAO found endeavor had merit and beneficiary well positioned, but waiver not warranted because labor certification was not shown impractical and no urgent national interest was demonstrated.
2 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWArts, design, architectureApr 2025Dismissed
Architect proposing sustainable design endeavors and green building projects seeks EB-2 with NIW. Met four of six exceptional ability criteria but failed to demonstrate expertise significantly above other architects. Record lacks comparative analysis and evidence of significant field impact. Appeal dismissed.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWOtherApr 2025Dismissed
Petitioner seeks NIW as advanced degree professional. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to establish five years progressive post-baccalaureate experience in specialty as required for underlying EB-2 classification; NIW eligibility not reached.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementApr 2025Dismissed
Carpenter and business owner sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with national interest waiver. Claimed six criteria for exceptional ability but satisfied only two: academic degree and employer letters. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner failed to meet minimum three criteria required for exceptional ability; therefore NIW analysis was not reached.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEntrepreneurshipApr 2025Dismissed
Entrepreneur founding a trucking business claimed exceptional ability and NIW. AAO found the law degree did not relate to exceptional ability, the commercial driver license did not demonstrate professional practice, salary evidence was lacking, and the purported professional association was not verified, making the petitioner ineligible for the underlying classification and therefore ineligible for NIW.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AEntrepreneurshipMar 2025Dismissed
An entrepreneur in the digital exhibition field sought EB-1A classification. The service center accepted that the initial evidentiary criteria were satisfied, including membership, press coverage, judging, articles and a leading role, but denied at the final merits step. The AAO dismissed the appeal because the evidence did not place her among the field's top percentage.
5 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWChemistry and materialsMar 2025Dismissed
Chemical technician with non-toxic epoxy product experience sought EB-2 exceptional ability and NIW. AAO found petitioner met only two of six required criteria: degree and experience letter failed statutory requirements. Appeal dismissed because petitioner lacks underlying EB-2 eligibility.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWEducation and academiaMar 2025Dismissed
Foreign language teacher and entrepreneur proposed bilingual education center using sign languages and Portuguese. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance; projected job creation and revenue lacked supporting detail and showed limited economic impact beyond local region.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWFinance and economicsMar 2025Dismissed
A chief financial officer and corporate treasurer sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a financial services consulting business targeting immigrant clients. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance as it would serve only specific clients without broader industry impact or substantial economic effects in depressed areas.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWBusiness and managementMar 2025Dismissed
Entrepreneur seeking EB-2 NIW to establish New York risk management and internal audit consultancy. Claimed endeavor offers innovative approach and substantial economic effects. AAO dismissed appeal, holding that field importance does not equal endeavor national importance; specific business lacks broader implications for economy or industry.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementMar 2025Dismissed
A human resources professional in Brazil sought EB-1A classification. She claimed five criteria: membership, judging, original contributions, leading role, and high salary. The AAO found only judging was met and dismissed the appeal, concluding she failed to satisfy the required three criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim.
1 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-2 NIWComputer science and AIMar 2025Dismissed
Systems administrator for AI laboratory in clinical research company seeks EB-2 with NIW. Petitioner showed substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance of the endeavor. Decision held specific work lacks broader implications or scale reaching national impact in STEM despite relating to AI and clinical trials.
0 of 3 criteria metRead → - EB-1AHealthcare, clinicalMar 2025Dismissed
Dentist sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to satisfy the three required evidentiary criteria: the award lacked documentation of standards and selectivity, and membership requirements did not demonstrate recognition by national or international experts.
0 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsMar 2025Dismissed
Independent film director from China sought EB-1A. AAO upheld denial: satisfied no claimed criteria. Awards not nationally recognized; association membership not documented; published article about work not about petitioner; original contributions unproven with only one feature and short film. Final merits review failed.
0 of 5 criteria metRead →
