Outcome: Dismissed
AUG192020_01B2203
Our summary
Advertising senior account executive petitioned for extraordinary ability. Claimed five criteria; two were met (judging and leading role). Appeal dismissed because membership and high salary criteria were not satisfied. Only two criteria met; three required. Record lacked evidence of top-level sustained acclaim.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Petitioner fulfilled judging criterion.
- Leading or critical role · Petitioner fulfilled leading or critical role criterion.
What was missing
- High salary · Insufficient comparative salary data for field provided.
- Membership · AAM membership requires experience, not outstanding achievement judged by experts.
- Final merits · Insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim at top of field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Petitioner fulfilled judging criterion. | |
| Met | Petitioner fulfilled leading or critical role criterion. | |
| Not met | Insufficient comparative salary data for field provided. | |
| Not met | AAM membership requires experience, not outstanding achievement judged by experts. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but waived on appeal; Director's findings not contested. | |
| Not met | Insufficient evidence of sustained national or international acclaim at top of field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
