Outcome: Dismissed
JUN072021_02B2203
Our summary
Media management expert sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed judging, leading role, salary, and original contributions criteria. AAO found only judging criterion met; one criterion insufficient. Record lacks evidence of sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability classification.
Official PDF
Official PDF ↗Published by USCIS. The summary is ours, in our own words; the decision text is on uscis.gov.
What the AAO accepted
- Judging · Service as judge for award demonstrates participation in judging work of others.
What was missing
- High salary · Unable to establish actual salary receipt or comparison to others in field.
- Leading or critical role · Insufficient evidence of distinguished reputation of organizations or clarity of leading role duties.
- Final merits · Record does not support sustained national or international acclaim or place at top of field.
Criteria
| Criterion | Reading | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Met | Service as judge for award demonstrates participation in judging work of others. | |
| Not met | Unable to establish actual salary receipt or comparison to others in field. | |
| Not met | Insufficient evidence of distinguished reputation of organizations or clarity of leading role duties. | |
| Claimed, not analyzed | Claimed but not analyzed; ineligible at initial criteria stage. | |
| Not met | Record does not support sustained national or international acclaim or place at top of field. |
A published decision describes one case. It is not legal advice and not a prediction for yours.
