Published AAO appeal decisions

Data scientist seeks NIW for developing fraud prevention systems at employer. AAO found proposed endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; employer benefits insufficient to show broader implications for field or economy.

Ph.D. computer scientist in machine learning and healthcare sought EB-2 NIW. Claimed research has national importance based on industry relevance and policy alignment. AAO dismissed finding petitioner conflated field importance with specific endeavor impact and failed to show particular proposed research would result in national-level consequences.

Beneficiary is a software engineer at a technology company proposing to work on enterprise connectivity and digital platforms. The AAO found substantial merit but rejected the petition because the beneficiary failed to demonstrate that her specific proposed endeavor has national importance; work benefiting a single employer, even with national footprint, is insufficient.

A manufacturing engineer with an advanced degree sought an NIW for semiconductor work. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance of the specific proposed endeavor beyond his employer's contributions.

A specialist in digital transformation and cybersecurity seeks EB-2 advanced degree classification and NIW. Service center found substantial merit and that petitioner was well-positioned to advance the endeavor but rejected it for lack of national importance. AAO affirmed dismissal, finding the specific proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance despite field importance.

Systems development manager in Brazil sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Claimed four criteria; AAO found only judging criterion met, fewer than three required. Appeal dismissed; petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or top-tier field status.

Software development company petitioning for CEO beneficiary for EB-1A extraordinary ability. USCIS approved three criteria; AAO withdrew original contributions finding, leaving only two criteria met. Final merits determination failed to show top-tier standing, dismissing appeal.

A semiconductor technology researcher with a Ph.D. sought NIW under Dhanasar. USCIS denied, finding advanced degree qualification but failing all three Dhanasar prongs. AAO remanded, finding USCIS did not meaningfully evaluate the record or address petitioner's evidence.

Technology startup founder seeking EB-1A classification claimed eight evidentiary criteria; SCOPS found six met and AAO confirmed leading role criterion. However, AAO rejected the petition because sustained national or international acclaim was not demonstrated, with nearly all achievements from 2024-2025 and recognition limited to startup ecosystems, failing final merits review.

A software engineer with master's degree in computer science seeks EB-2 national interest waiver for designing novel algorithms in private cloud storage. The AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor lacked demonstrated national importance beyond the employer's specific needs.

A systems engineering specialist sought EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked sufficient national importance under Dhanasar. Working in telecommunications generally does not establish specific endeavor importance; broader industry relevance was insufficient.

A technology corporation sponsored an engineer for EB-2 with NIW to advance wireless RF digital module design. The petitioner failed to address the third Dhanasar prong (balance favoring waiver) including labor certification impracticality; the appeal arguments were limited and did not meaningfully contest the service center's denial. The appeal was dismissed as the third prong is dispositive.

Data scientist in financial technology and artificial intelligence employed as vice president sought EB-1A classification. Met three criteria initially established by service center, but AAO withdrew the awards finding and found the totality of evidence insufficient to demonstrate extraordinary ability and placement among the top percentage of the field.

Business and financial management company sponsored beneficiary in artificial intelligence and computer vision. AAO withdrew SCOPS' findings on all four criteria due to insufficient evidence and analysis, concluding record does not meet minimum three-criterion threshold for extraordinary ability.

An AI investment bank petitioned for its founder, a technology entrepreneur, claiming extraordinary ability under EB-1A. The beneficiary claimed seven criteria. The AAO found venture capital funding is not an award for excellence and Forbes Technology Council membership does not require outstanding achievement judged by experts, dismissing the appeal.

Telecommunications engineer sought EB-2 NIW for startup company providing connectivity and cybersecurity solutions. SCOPS found substantial merit but denied lack of national importance. AAO affirmed, finding proposed endeavor lacked specific details about services, job creation, and scale necessary to demonstrate national importance.

An AI consulting firm sought EB-1A classification for a chief technology officer. The AAO found the beneficiary met the judging criterion on appeal, satisfying three total criteria. The matter was remanded for a final merits determination on whether the beneficiary demonstrates sustained acclaim and placement at the very top of the field.

Software engineering manager in cloud computing and AI-driven platforms sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. The AAO dismissed the appeal because although the petitioner met three initial criteria, the totality of evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or that he ranks among the very top of his field.

A company petitioned for EB-1A classification for its co-founder and head of product in technology. The service center found two criteria met: leading role and high salary. The AAO affirmed denial because the petitioner failed to establish three required criteria; awards, membership, published material, and scholarship claims all fell short of regulatory standards.

AI engineer self-petitioner sought NIW based on broad plans to advance AI and exponential technologies for healthcare and general use. AAO found no specific proposed endeavor: petitioner discussed general intentions without particularizing data-driven tools, efficiency gains, or LLM inference work. Appeal dismissed; favorable prong determinations withdrawn without specific endeavor.

Technology company petitioned for CTO classified as extraordinary ability in technology entrepreneurship. SCOPS found two criteria met; AAO found judging criterion also satisfied. Decision remanded for final merits determination on sustained acclaim and top percentile status after establishing three evidentiary criteria.

IT consultant sought EB-2 with national interest waiver claiming exceptional ability. AAO affirmed second denial after remand, finding only one of six exceptional ability criteria met. National importance not established for proposed IT consulting endeavor.

A machine learning engineer with a master's degree sought EB-2 NIW for research into autonomous driving and robotics systems. The AAO confirmed he met the advanced degree requirement and that his endeavor had substantial merit, but rejected the petition because his proposed research lacked sufficient evidence of national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.

A software engineer with a master's in computer engineering seeks EB-2 NIW for work in AI recommendation systems and APIs. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the endeavor failed the national importance prong of Dhanasar because benefits do not extend beyond the employer to regional or national scope.

A software engineer with a master's degree in electrical and computer engineering sought an NIW for work in edge AI computing. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner failed to establish national importance through credible, probative evidence comparable to the standard set in Dhanasar.