Published AAO appeal decisions

An assistant professor of sociology seeking EB-2 with NIW claimed her research on criminal justice reform technology has national importance. The AAO found her endeavor has substantial merit but lacks the specific prospective national impact required under Dhanasar, dismissing the appeal.

A lawyer sought EB-2 national interest waiver (NIW). He initially stated vague intent to continue studies and practice, then materially changed his proposed endeavor on appeal to establish a legal consulting and education business. The AAO dismissed because he did not establish a specific proposed endeavor at filing, and changed proposals cannot cure defects.

Attorney specializing in intellectual property and cybercrime seeking EB-2 NIW proposed consulting business with claimed job creation and tax benefits. AAO dismissed, finding endeavor lacks sufficient national importance and evidence does not demonstrate broader impact on field beyond specific business and clients.

Lawyer seeking EB-2 advanced degree classification and national interest waiver to establish legal consultancy for sustainable energy. Claimed substantial merit and national importance for Center for Legal Innovation in Sustainable Energy but failed to demonstrate national importance or specific improvements over existing initiatives. AAO dismissed appeal; first and third prongs not established.

An attorney sought EB-2 NIW classification for fire safety compliance work. SCOPS initially approved but revoked, finding no national importance. AAO affirmed dismissal, holding that working in an important field alone is insufficient; petitioner must show proposed endeavor's prospective impact reaches national importance level.

Senior legal advisor with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Service center denied without analyzing evidence against Dhanasar framework. AAO remanded because service center failed to discuss evidence, identify insufficiencies, or explain conclusions for any of the three prongs required for meaningful appellate review.

Advanced degree professional in human trafficking prevention seeking EB-2 national interest waiver. Petitioner established substantial merit but failed to demonstrate national importance of specific proposed endeavor. While human trafficking prevention is federally recognized as priority, petitioner's individual work lacks evidence of prospective national or global impact beyond immediate clients. Appeal dismissed.

Petitioner sponsored lawyer beneficiary for EB-2 national interest waiver in bankruptcy and student loan law. First Dhanasar prong failed because specific endeavor lacks national importance; work limited to individual client representation without broader impact on field. Reserved remaining prongs.

Human rights attorney sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. While demonstrating exceptional ability and current human rights work, petitioner failed to articulate a specific future endeavor with substantial merit and national importance under Dhanasar. Continuing employment in current position does not constitute sufficient proposed endeavor.

An anti-corruption and investigations specialist sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for police department work. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner ineligible for the underlying EB-2 classification and that the proposed endeavor lacked national importance under Dhanasar's first prong.

Researcher, teacher, and policy adviser sought EB-2 advanced degree classification and NIW. AAO reversed director on national importance prong but affirmed denial on second prong: published research does not prove petitioner well positioned to advance the specific proposed endeavor without additional evidence of progress or success.

A legal consultant with an advanced degree sought EB-2 national interest waiver for a corporate consultancy business. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding that projected revenue and job creation from legal and tax services lacked evidence of national importance and did not demonstrate substantial positive economic effects reaching national scale.

A lawyer sought NIW for EB-2 classification. Petitioner claimed the endeavor assisting companies with business transactions would benefit the U.S. economy. The AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance because benefits would not extend beyond individual clients or the field generally.

Political scientist sought EB-2 national interest waiver after qualifying for advanced degree classification. Director found substantial merit but not national importance. AAO affirmed, holding petitioner failed to demonstrate specific prospective impact of Central Asian affairs research on field or U.S. economy at requisite level.

Legal analyst sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Director found petitioner qualified for underlying EB-2 classification but failed all three Dhanasar prongs. AAO affirmed, finding petitioner changed proposed endeavor from legal analyst to legal business analyst entrepreneur, preventing coherent Dhanasar analysis.

Research analyst with advanced degree sought NIW for EB-2 proposing research on preventing recidivism in juvenile detention facilities. AAO found beneficiary qualified for EB-2 but dismissed because proposed endeavor lacked sufficient evidence of national importance or broader field impact.

A social work coordinator sought a national interest waiver for an EB-2 position. The AAO found the petitioner qualified for advanced degree classification but failed the first Dhanasar prong: the proposed endeavor lacked national importance, had only state-level scope, and showed no potential for national economic effects or process improvements.