Published AAO appeal decisions

A semiconductor technology researcher with a Ph.D. sought NIW under Dhanasar. USCIS denied, finding advanced degree qualification but failing all three Dhanasar prongs. AAO remanded, finding USCIS did not meaningfully evaluate the record or address petitioner's evidence.

A software company sponsored a computer programmer for EB-2 advanced degree classification, not a national interest waiver. After approval, the service center revoked the petition over intent to employ and experience. The AAO withdrew those findings, noted other possible revocation grounds, including ability to pay, and remanded for a new decision.

A semiconductor manufacturer sought to employ a component design engineer under the EB-2 advanced degree classification with a labor certification. The case is not an NIW. The service center found the beneficiary lacked a required skill, and the AAO withdrew that decision and remanded for review of recruitment materials.

Software engineer with Ph.D. in electrical engineering seeks NIW for fraud detection platform development. AAO remanded, finding USCIS mischaracterized the endeavor as biomedical and failed to adequately analyze national importance, positioning, and balance prongs under Dhanasar framework.

A component design engineer was sponsored by a programmable logic device manufacturer under the EB-2 advanced degree category with a labor certification, not a national interest waiver. The service center denied for missing skills. The AAO withdrew that decision and remanded for review of successor-in-interest status, advertising evidence and qualifying experience.

An AI consulting firm sought EB-1A classification for a chief technology officer. The AAO found the beneficiary met the judging criterion on appeal, satisfying three total criteria. The matter was remanded for a final merits determination on whether the beneficiary demonstrates sustained acclaim and placement at the very top of the field.

A resident physician with a bachelor of medicine degree sought NIW for EB-2. The AAO reversed the service center's denial of underlying EB-2 eligibility and remanded for proper analysis of national interest waiver under Dhanasar, finding the service center failed to provide meaningful reasoning.

Technology company petitioned for CTO classified as extraordinary ability in technology entrepreneurship. SCOPS found two criteria met; AAO found judging criterion also satisfied. Decision remanded for final merits determination on sustained acclaim and top percentile status after establishing three evidentiary criteria.

A badminton club petitions for an O-1A visa for a coach. The applicant demonstrated national championships, published media coverage, and national team membership. AAO remanded to determine whether three criteria are satisfied and whether coaching represents continuation of extraordinary ability in athletics.

An employer, a golf course management firm, sponsored an IT project manager for an advanced degree professional classification supported by a labor certification. The service center revoked the approval, alleging a concealed family relationship. The AAO withdrew the revocation and remanded, because no notice of intent to revoke was issued and the decision did not state specific reasons.

Clinical director in implant dentistry petitioner claimed five criteria; service center found only one met. AAO found beneficiary also met judging and critical role criteria on de novo review. Case remanded for final merits determination assessing whether sustained acclaim and top-tier status demonstrated.

A property management company sponsored a graphic designer under the EB-2 advanced degree category, not a national interest waiver. After approval was revoked for lack of intent to employ full-time and inability to pay, the AAO found those grounds unsupported but noted missing ability-to-pay evidence for the priority date year, and remanded.

Electrical engineer sought EB-2 NIW. AAO withdrew SCOPS denial and remanded. Petitioner established substantial merit and national importance of proposed research and that he is well positioned to advance it through education, experience, and expert support. SCOPS must reconsider whether balancing factors favor waiving job offer requirement.

Computer scientist with advanced degree proposed developing computer vision and large language models for drug discovery. AAO found SCOPS failed to adequately analyze whether endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, contained contradictory statements on second prong, and insufficiently analyzed third prong. Decision withdrawn and remanded.

Software development manager sought EB-2 with NIW. Service center denied for failure to establish advanced degree eligibility, precluding NIW analysis. AAO found service center decision inadequately reasoned; remanded for full review of threshold EB-2 qualification and subsequent NIW determination.

Senior software engineer at AI-driven background check company appealed EB-1A denial. Service Center initially found three criteria met, then in denial found only one met, without adequate explanation. AAO remanded for fuller analysis of each criterion and potential final merits determination, citing insufficient notice and inadequate reasoning.

A business administrator sought EB-2 classification as advanced degree professional or person of exceptional ability, plus NIW. SCOPS denied both. The AAO remanded, finding SCOPS misrepresented the record, confused two separate petitions, and did not provide meaningful opportunity to contest. No opinion on ultimate merits.

An employer petitioned for a software engineer under the advanced degree category, relying on a labor certification requiring a bachelor's degree plus five years of experience in an alternate occupation. The service center denied it for lacking an advanced degree requirement. The AAO withdrew that decision and remanded for further evidence on actual minimum requirements.

An employer petitioned for a websystems administrator under EB-2 advanced degree category with labor certification. The service center revoked approval due to an undisclosed familial relationship between the beneficiary and the petitioner's president. The AAO found the labor certification remained valid but remanded to determine whether either party willfully misrepresented material facts.

Senior legal advisor with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. Service center denied without analyzing evidence against Dhanasar framework. AAO remanded because service center failed to discuss evidence, identify insufficiencies, or explain conclusions for any of the three prongs required for meaningful appellate review.

An employer petitions for software engineer beneficiary for EB-2 NIW classification. SCOPS erred by analyzing prior work rather than proposed endeavor, and failed to apply STEM field guidance. AAO withdrew SCOPS decision and remanded for proper analysis of all three Dhanasar prongs with appropriate consideration of software engineering innovation.

Senior engineer in AI research seeking NIW under Dhanasar framework for continued research on safe, autonomous AI systems. Service center's denial lacked complete analysis of evidence, made contradictory statements, and failed to address all arguments. Remanded for proper application of all three Dhanasar prongs with complete evidentiary analysis.

A civil engineer with a master's degree in civil engineering sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO agreed he qualified as an advanced degree professional but remanded the case because SCOPS made contradictory statements on national importance and provided no analysis for the well-positioned prong, denying him fair notice.

Mechanical engineer with advanced degree sought EB-2 with national interest waiver for semiconductor manufacturing advancement. Service center denied without adequate explanation of Dhanasar prongs analysis. AAO remanded for new decision because service center failed to explain rationale and adequately address petitioner's proposed endeavor rather than employment position.

Tattoo studio petitioned for O-1A classification for tattoo artist beneficiary. AAO determined beneficiary met at least three evidentiary criteria despite SCOPS finding only two. Decision withdrawn and remanded for SCOPS to evaluate totality of evidence and determine whether beneficiary demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim in the arts.