AAO Decisions Explorer · Free
Published AAO appeal decisions
Search the decisions the Administrative Appeals Office has published, narrow them by visa, criterion, field and year, and read our summary of each one with a link to the official PDF.

Decisions in the library
6,586
6,586 classified
Visa types
3
Years covered
2005-2026
Latest decision
Aug 31, 2026
Filters
1,224 decisions
Outcomes in these results
- Dismissed
- Remanded
- Sustained
- EB-1ABusiness and managementFeb 2023Dismissed
Personnel management consultant in Russian-speaking countries claimed five criteria under EB-1A. AAO dismissed appeal, finding no major award and no satisfaction of three required criteria. Evidence lacked specificity, objectivity, and documentation; petitioner showed no sustained national or international acclaim.
0 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AComputer science and AIFeb 2023Dismissed
Network communications professional claimed eight criteria for extraordinary ability. Director found two criteria met. Petitioner on appeal reasserted three additional criteria on appeal but failed to overcome deficiencies in evidence or explain how Director erred. AAO held petitioner did not meet the extra criteria and lacked sustained acclaim for top-of-field status.
2 of 9 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureFeb 2023Dismissed
Photographer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Claimed four criteria: awards, published material, exhibitions, and critical role. AAO rejected all four findings; none met regulatory requirements. No sustained acclaim established.
0 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureFeb 2023Dismissed
Fashion designer met only two criteria (judging, exhibitions) and failed three-criterion threshold. AAO dismissed appeal finding insufficient evidence that Mara de Oro Award or Venezuelan publications qualified as nationally or internationally recognized, and that petitioner lacked sustained national or international acclaim required.
2 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsJan 2023Dismissed
Bodybuilder claimed extraordinary ability through five criteria. AAO found none met: membership based only on regional contest win; published material in non-qualifying venues; critical role lacking evidence of organizational distinction. No sustained acclaim demonstrated.
0 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-1AEntrepreneurshipJan 2023Dismissed
Entrepreneur and business executive sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Met only one of three required criteria (published material about him). AAO rejected awards, membership, judging, and leading role claims. No major recognized award. Appeal dismissed for failure to meet initial evidentiary threshold.
1 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athleticsJan 2023Dismissed
A competitive aircraft model pilot sought EB-1A classification. He claimed membership, published material, and one other criterion. The AAO found he did not establish major award status or three alternate criteria, including that his blog posts were not major media and his title did not evidence association membership. The appeal was dismissed.
0 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-1AMarketing, media, communicationsJan 2023Dismissed
Event producer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Met initial evidentiary criteria but AAO found evidence insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or position among top event producers. Single media mention and isolated judging instance do not establish required level of achievement.
1 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and management2023Dismissed
Self-petitioner, business supply chain software specialist, sought EB-1A extraordinary ability. Met only one of three required criteria (published material). AAO rejected membership in professional associations and leading role claims due to insufficient evidence and timing issues. Appeal dismissed.
1 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architecture2023Dismissed
Comics creator and illustrator self-petitioning for EB-1A extraordinary ability claimed three criteria. AAO found one criterion met: a nationally recognized Venezuelan award for excellence in plastic arts. Published material and leading critical role claims were rejected. Appeal dismissed because only two of ten required criteria established.
1 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-1ALaw, policy, social science2023Dismissed
A pastor sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification through Christian missions work. Although the director found four criteria met, the AAO reversed three findings on review and affirmed only published material. With only one criterion met, the petitioner failed to meet the three-criterion threshold and lacked sustained national or international acclaim.
1 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1ASports and athletics2023Dismissed
Sambo and judo champion sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. AAO affirmed dismissal because petitioner failed to present either a major international award or three qualifying criteria; record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim requisite for the classification.
1 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-1ALaw, policy, social scienceDec 2022Dismissed
A tax consultant with a law degree sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. She claimed six criteria but met none. The AAO found her honors and publications did not meet regulatory standards and her achievements, while notable in academia, lacked the sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability.
0 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1AFilm, music, performing artsDec 2022Dismissed
A musician who plays a folk stringed instrument sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming six criteria. The Director found four met. The AAO withdrew two of those findings, leaving only two criteria satisfied, short of the required three, and dismissed the appeal.
2 of 6 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureDec 2022Dismissed
Jewelry maker claims extraordinary ability in arts. Director found two criteria met; petitioner claimed four additional on appeal. AAO dismissed, rejecting membership, published material, original contributions, and scholarly articles. Record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or position among top field practitioners.
2 of 11 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureNov 2022Dismissed
Self-petitioner speech and theatrical coach sought EB-1A classification. Met three preliminary criteria: judging, published material, critical role. AAO dismissed appeal because evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim required for extraordinary ability classification.
3 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementNov 2022Dismissed
Chief executive officer and solutions architect claimed four criteria including membership, published material, leading role, and high salary. AAO found none met. YPO membership lacked demonstrated outstanding achievement standard. Published materials insufficient in prominence or attribution. Executive experience alone does not establish upper echelon status required.
0 of 5 criteria metRead → - EB-1AComputer science and AIOct 2022Dismissed
An entrepreneur and researcher in cybersecurity on O-1 visa sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO affirmed dismissal, finding he satisfied only two of ten criteria and thus failed the initial threshold, with aggregate review showing insufficient acclaim and recognition required for the classification.
2 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1AHealthcare, clinicalOct 2022Dismissed
A radiologist seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification met the threshold evidentiary criteria but failed the final merits determination. The AAO found that while the petitioner demonstrated substantial accomplishments and institutional affiliations, the evidence did not establish sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of nuclear medicine.
6 of 8 criteria metRead → - EB-1AHealthcare, clinicalOct 2022Dismissed
A Venezuelan OB/GYN physician claimed extraordinary ability through eight criteria. The AAO found two criteria met: judging and scholarly articles. However, these routine academic activities lack the acclaim requirement, and the petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international recognition or widespread field impact.
2 of 9 criteria metRead → - EB-1AMechanical and aerospace engineeringOct 2022Dismissed
A licensed professional engineer in HVAC systems sought EB-1A classification. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met only the published material criterion but failed to establish three or more criteria or sustained national acclaim needed for extraordinary ability classification.
1 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1AFinance and economicsOct 2022Dismissed
Asset manager specializing in insurance and pensions seeks extraordinary ability classification. AAO confirmed three evidentiary criteria met but found final merits not established. Limited and non-sustained media coverage and standard peer review activity insufficient to demonstrate sustained acclaim at top of field.
3 of 4 criteria metRead → - EB-1AMechanical and aerospace engineeringSep 2022Dismissed
A printing engineer specializing in flexographic technology sought extraordinary ability classification, claiming six criteria. The AAO found only one satisfied, rejected two, treated two as abandoned and reserved one. Lacking three criteria, the appeal was dismissed, and the Director's willful misrepresentation finding was withdrawn.
1 of 7 criteria metRead → - EB-1AArts, design, architectureSep 2022Sustained
Tattoo artist and painter claimed seven criteria; Director found three threshold criteria met. AAO sustained appeal, finding at final merits that petitioner achieved sustained national or international acclaim through substantial media presence, large social media following, and documented professional recognition as widely respected artist.
4 of 10 criteria metRead → - EB-1ABusiness and managementSep 2022Sustained
An oil and gas industry executive sought extraordinary ability classification. The service center found the initial criteria met but denied on final merits. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding additional criteria satisfied and concluding that the whole record showed sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing, which the director had overlooked.
5 of 7 criteria metRead →
