Published AAO appeal decisions

Graduate student in international law sought EB-2 NIW for online platform expanding African student pathways to U.S. education. AAO dismissed appeal, finding the specific endeavor lacks national importance; modest projected hiring and revenue insufficient for substantial economic impact.

Hammered dulcimer artist and music educator sought EB-1A extraordinary ability to promote hammered dulcimer education and address educational gap. Claimed three criteria on appeal; AAO found petitioner did not satisfy membership or original contributions criteria, and waived remaining claims, thus failing to meet three-criterion threshold.

Research scholar and professor claims extraordinary ability. Met three regulatory criteria but failed final merits determination. AAO found evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim required for small percentage at top of field.

Professor of applied linguistics sought EB-1A classification. Claimed six criteria; AAO found petitioner failed to satisfy at least three criteria by rejecting awards, published material, and original contributions findings. Withdrew SCOPS' favorable determinations on these three without reaching final merits given failure to meet evidentiary prongs.

A political science professor and researcher with a master's and PhD sought EB-1A classification based on extraordinary ability. She claimed nine regulatory criteria. The AAO found the awards and membership criteria unmet and did not reach the remaining criteria or final merits because initial evidence threshold was not satisfied.

A designer of mathematical education programs with EB-2 advanced degree sought NIW. AAO affirmed denial, finding the proposed endeavor had substantial merit but petitioner failed to demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial economic benefits required for national importance.

An educational planning and evaluation expert sought EB-1A classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, holding that while the petitioner met judging and scholarly articles criteria, only two of required three criteria were satisfied, and the overall evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim at elite level.

High school mathematics teacher with fifteen years experience seeks NIW for EB-2 to develop hybrid and distance learning instructional framework. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to address USCIS findings on the third Dhanasar prong and waived the issue by failing to contest specific conclusions about impracticality of labor certification and national benefit.

Training and development specialist sought NIW for STEM education framework under Dhanasar. Advanced degree established. First prong failed: while endeavor had substantial merit, record lacked evidence of national importance and broad prospective impact. Framework described as scalable and replicable without detail or demonstrated innovation. Second and third prongs not reached.

Educational technology researcher claimed NIW for health literacy research advancing competency-based learning. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance despite university adoption at one institution, and applicant failed to show recent productivity or sustained research continuation warranting waiver.

Mathematics educator with 17 years teaching experience sought NIW for EB-2 classification. AAO affirmed SCOPS denial, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance because impacts were limited to her company and students without demonstrating broader field-level benefits or innovation.

An art history professor and researcher claimed extraordinary ability through peer review, publications, and scholarly contributions. The AAO found she met three initial criteria but concluded she lacked sustained national or international acclaim and did not rank among the very top in her field, ultimately denying the petition.

Professional in employee training and development sought EB-2 national interest waiver. Failed NIW Dhanasar first prong; proposed nationwide capacity-building endeavor lacks demonstrated national importance and lacks specific scalable model or significant U.S. employment potential.

Psychologist and psychology school founder in Kazakhstan claims extraordinary ability. Met published material criterion and meets judging criterion on appeal review. Failed to demonstrate original contributions of major significance or sufficient evidence on other criteria. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner did not satisfy three initial evidentiary criteria threshold.

An English as second language teacher sought extraordinary ability classification. The AAO held she met fewer than three evidentiary criteria; her teaching materials and peer respect were insufficient to show sustained national or international acclaim or recognition among the very top of her field. Appeal dismissed.

ESL instructor claimed extraordinary ability under EB-1A. Met judging criterion only. Membership and leading role criteria rejected; published material and original contributions waived on appeal; high salary reserved. Petitioner failed three-criterion threshold, so final merits not analyzed.

A teacher seeks EB-1A classification claiming awards, contributions, judging, and scholarly articles criteria. The AAO found only two criteria met by the service center. It rejected awards as lacking international recognition, rejected original contributions for insufficient evidence of major significance, and declined to reach a final merits determination because the petitioner failed the threshold requirement of three criteria.

A professor and researcher in technical science sought extraordinary ability classification. She claimed no major award and did not adequately support three required criteria on appeal. The AAO found willful misrepresentation in submitted documents and dismissed the appeal, noting serious errors unresolved when given opportunity to rebut.

An environmental science professor and researcher specializing in soil conservation and AI-powered monitoring systems sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner met only two criteria (judging and scholarly articles) and failed to establish the required three; final merits determination also failed.

A philosophy researcher claimed seven extraordinary ability criteria; SCOPS found four met. AAO, in final merits determination, dismissed the appeal, concluding the totality of evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that petitioner is among the very top of the field despite meeting initial criteria.

Assistant professor of Arabic languages seeks waiver based on language instruction and curriculum development supporting military personnel readiness. Claimed endeavor involves research on cross-cultural communication and specialized translation. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor has commendable ambitions but lacks documented prospective impact rising to national importance.

An intercultural communication assistant professor claimed five EB-1A criteria. The AAO found judging and scholarly articles met, but awards and original contributions failed; only two criteria satisfied. Because threshold initial evidence requirements were not met, the appeal was dismissed without final merits analysis.

Teacher claiming extraordinary ability under EB-1A. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner met zero of the evidentiary criteria claimed; awards lack recognition, memberships unsubstantiated, published material insufficient, judging participation undocumented. Threshold of three criteria not met.

A musician and music educator sought EB-2 immigrant classification with national interest waiver. SCOPS established advanced degree eligibility but denied the waiver. The AAO remanded because SCOPS failed to sufficiently analyze the three Dhanasar prongs and did not put the petitioner on notice of evidentiary deficiencies.

Ethnomusicology researcher meets four initial criteria (publications, judging, scholarly articles, critical role) but AAO held totality of evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or small-percentage-at-top status: publication record typical for specialized field, media coverage lacks comparative context, and judging not shown to be prestigious.