Published AAO appeal decisions

Investment consultant and attorney sought NIW for consulting company serving foreign clients. Qualified for underlying EB-2 but failed to establish national importance of specific proposed endeavor. Advisory opinion letters addressing industry relevance insufficient without demonstrating prospective impact of particular venture.

A conflict resolution specialist sought NIW to provide mediation and conciliation services to Brazilian immigrants and businesses. AAO found the endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance: the business plan showing revenue projections and job creation across four states did not demonstrate substantial prospective impact on regional or national economy or broader field influence beyond limited clients.

An advanced degree professional proposed an endeavor spanning project management, law, and economics including trade policy, corporate law, and women's economic empowerment. The AAO found her endeavor insufficiently defined and failed to establish that individual employment would impact the nation broadly or employment levels, despite labor shortages.

Foreign legal consultant sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal finding no national importance. Laudable goals for capital accumulation, job creation, and legal innovation lacked evidence of prospective broad impact. Past achievements and conclusions about influence on legal field insufficient without detailed demonstration of field-wide or economic significance.

Foreign legal consultant sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial, finding petitioner qualified for EB-2 and proposed endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance. Industry reports and unsupported assertions insufficient to show prospective impact beyond individual clients.

Legal analyst and entrepreneur with advanced degree seeking EB-2 NIW classification proposed business endeavor in legal field. AAO agreed with director that although endeavor had substantial merit, national importance was not established because benefits were isolated to petitioner's company and clients without broader impact on the legal field at national level.

An attorney sought EB-2 national interest waiver for international arbitration legal advisory work. The AAO found the proposed endeavor materially changed in response to RFE, lacked detailed initial description, and failed to demonstrate national importance beyond assisting individual clients despite evidence of ADR field merit. Appeal dismissed.

A public policy consultant proposed independent consulting on international development and U.S. firm partnerships in developing countries. The AAO held her endeavor lacks national importance; while work has substantial merit, it does not extend beyond her consulting clientele to impact the field or U.S. economy at a national level.

Lawyer-entrepreneur sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO found substantial merit in proposed legal services business but dismissed appeal because national importance not demonstrated. Revenue and job projections lacked credible support and regional impact insufficient for national significance.

A manager and lawyer sought national interest waiver for immigration consulting business. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the proposed endeavor lacked national importance and the petitioner was not well positioned to advance it, lacking immigration law credentials and prior business ownership experience.

Correctional officer and former Brazilian Army member sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification and national interest waiver. AAO dismissed appeal, finding petitioner failed to meet three of six regulatory evidentiary criteria for exceptional ability, including membership in professional associations, and therefore ineligible for underlying EB-2 classification.

Social worker seeks EB-1A classification for extraordinary ability. Claimed authorship of scholarly articles and leading role in established organization. AAO found unpublished manuscripts and insufficient evidence of distinguished organizational reputation; failed to meet three required criteria; appeal dismissed.

An attorney seeking registration as registered foreign legal consultant in California requested EB-2 national interest waiver. The AAO found no well-detailed proposed endeavor description, no demonstration that cross-border legal advice would have significant broader implications, and noted post-filing evidence of French legal authorization was untimely. Appeal dismissed.

Tax attorney sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO withdrew director's unsupported denial of advanced degree qualification but affirmed NIW denial. Proposed endeavor, though meritorious, lacked broader field impact or prospective implications beyond individual clients.

International taxation lawyer sought EB-2 with national interest waiver to establish law firm. Claimed HUBZone eligibility and employment potential. AAO dismissed appeal, finding proposed endeavor lacked national importance; vague location plans, modest employment and revenue projections insufficient for national benefit.

A medical doctor practicing medical malpractice litigation sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding the petitioner satisfied only one of ten criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim required to demonstrate extraordinary ability.

Legal consultant with advanced degree sought national interest waiver for consulting work supporting U.S. small and medium enterprises in internationalization. AAO found endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance; modest job creation projections insufficient to demonstrate prospective impact at national level. Appeal dismissed.

A lawyer seeking EB-2 national interest waiver to continue legal practice. AAO held the proposed endeavor lacks substantial national importance under Dhanasar because it would not impact the field or economy broadly, create significant jobs, or show prospective economic effects beyond her future employer.

A crime and intelligence specialist seeking EB-2 exceptional ability and national interest waiver. The AAO found the petitioner met four evidentiary criteria but lacked the requisite degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field. The waiver prongs were not reached due to failure on the underlying exceptional ability requirement.

A public safety officer seeking EB-2 classification with national interest waiver abandoned his appeal on the threshold issue of underlying EB-2 eligibility. The AAO dismissed the appeal without reaching the Dhanasar analysis because establishing eligibility for the underlying EB-2 classification is a prerequisite for any waiver consideration.

Priest seeking EB-2 NIW for spiritual ministry to Ukrainian Orthodox Church congregation claimed national importance through connection to White House Ukrainian relief initiative and pandemic-related needs. AAO held proposed endeavor lacks national importance because ministering to congregation's spiritual needs has no broader national implications and no substantial positive economic effects.

A self-petitioner with a criminal justice bachelor's degree and some law school study sought EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional or person of exceptional ability, with a national interest waiver. The appeal was dismissed because the degree, experience and other exceptional ability evidence fell short, so the waiver merits were not reached.

Lawyer from Kazakhstan sought EB-2 with national interest waiver. AAO affirmed denial because endeavor lacked national importance. Russian language skills and geopolitical concerns unpersuasive; proposed immigration paralegal work limited to local scope without broader regional or national impact.

A pastor sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification through Christian missions work. Although the director found four criteria met, the AAO reversed three findings on review and affirmed only published material. With only one criterion met, the petitioner failed to meet the three-criterion threshold and lacked sustained national or international acclaim.

An international legal consultant sought EB-2 advanced degree classification with NIW. The AAO agreed petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional but found the consulting endeavor lacked national importance, having only local/regional impact without broader field implications.