Published AAO appeal decisions

Competitive swimmer sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification based on national medals and team membership. AAO affirmed that petitioner met only two of ten criteria, falling short of the required three. Appeal dismissed because petitioner lacked sustained acclaim and did not demonstrate placement among top of field.

Police officer and trainer in Brazil seeking EB-1A extraordinary ability classification, claiming jiu-jitsu medal and various professional achievements. AAO found only three criteria met but rejected petition at final merits stage, finding petitioner lacked sustained national or international acclaim required for classification.

Amateur athlete and coach claiming extraordinary ability in athletics. Petitioner met three initial criteria but failed final merits step: lacked sustained acclaim, no competition or awards post-2017, limited media coverage, and coaching work did not demonstrate top-level achievement required for EB-1A.

Fitness instructor and entrepreneur sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver for fitness business. AAO dismissed because proposed endeavor lacks national importance; business would impact individual clients but not fitness industry broadly or nation.

A martial arts coach sought EB-2 classification with national interest waiver under Dhanasar. AAO dismissed, finding the proposed endeavor as a coach and trainer lacked sufficient evidence of substantial merit and national importance, failing the first prong of the framework.

An athlete seeking NIW claimed exceptional ability through criteria including ten years full-time experience and recognition. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding he did not meet three of six regulatory criteria for exceptional ability, thus did not qualify for underlying EB-2 classification.

A martial arts competitor and coach sought EB-1A classification. The AAO found he did not meet the initial evidence threshold of a major award or three evidentiary criteria. Awards lacked demonstrated national or international recognition, and published material related to his work as a player rather than coach. The petition was dismissed.

Athlete sought NIW for EB-2 as exceptional ability professional. Petitioner claimed national team membership, awards, and competition history. AAO dismissed because petitioner failed to meet underlying EB-2 eligibility criteria (did not satisfy three of six exceptional ability criteria). Dhanasar prongs reserved as analysis unnecessary without qualifying basis.

Athletic trainer qualified as individual of exceptional ability but sought national interest waiver for fitness startup company. AAO found proposed endeavor lacks national importance; hiring eleven workers and local client services insufficient to demonstrate broader implications required by Dhanasar framework.

Self-petitioning pilot seeks NIW as EB-2 advanced degree or exceptional ability professional. Failed to qualify for underlying EB-2 classification (only two of six criteria met). AAO dismissed; pilot work as proposed lacks substantial merit and national importance; endeavor insufficiently documented and explained.

A martial arts athlete competing in karate sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding he satisfied only two of three required criteria: judging and one other. Awards lacked national recognition; national team membership evidence was inconsistent regarding selection rigor.

Taekwondo athlete and coach claiming NIW under EB-2. Petitioner asserted exceptional ability under multiple criteria; Director found only one met. On appeal, insufficient arguments and evidence to overcome exceptional ability finding. NIW claim failed at first Dhanasar prong: proposed endeavor lacks national importance. Appeal dismissed.

A gymnastics coach sought EB-2 exceptional ability classification with a national interest waiver. The AAO affirmed that while the coach qualified for EB-2 and was well positioned to advance the endeavor, the proposed coaching lacked national importance because its impact was limited to specific gymnasts and a local setting rather than affecting the gymnastics field broadly.

An athlete competing since 2003 in national and international events including world championships sought EB-1A classification. The AAO dismissed the appeal, finding a single 2006 national championship title and participation in world championships did not demonstrate the sustained acclaim and top-tier field status required for extraordinary ability.

Volleyball coach meets initial award criterion but fails to establish final merits. AAO found petitioner, though with experience on national teams, lacks sustained national or international acclaim and remains at intermediate career stage rather than top of field.

A mountaineering guide and expedition leader sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification, claiming five criteria. AAO affirmed two criteria were met but rejected membership and declined to reach other criteria. Because petitioner satisfied only two of ten required criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim, appeal was dismissed.

A martial artist sought extraordinary ability classification. The AAO dismissed a motion to reconsider, finding the petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three initial evidentiary criteria, satisfied none of the claimed criteria, and the motion merely restated prior arguments without showing legal error.

Martial arts athlete and instructor claimed three criteria for EB-1A extraordinary ability. AAO found one criterion met but dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to establish three required criteria and lacked sustained national or international acclaim.

A racehorse jockey from Venezuela seeks EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Petitioner claimed six criteria but established only high salary. AAO dismissed the appeal, finding no nationally or internationally recognized awards, no qualifying association membership, no published material in major media, no exhibitions, and insufficient evidence of sustained acclaim or top-tier status despite some domestic racing success.

A wrestling coach claimed extraordinary ability, meeting three evidentiary criteria. The AAO found the evidence lacked comparative data showing he ranks among the very top coaches and that his media coverage and achievements did not demonstrate the sustained acclaim required.

Dance competitor and instructor sought exceptional ability classification and national interest waiver. AAO dismissed, finding proposed endeavor lacks national importance because competitive participation and instruction would not impact the field broadly, offer substantial job creation, or provide meaningful economic effects.

A weightlifter with exceptional ability seeks NIW for EB-2. AAO dismissed appeal because petitioner failed to provide specific proposed endeavor at filing; general intent to work in weightlifting lacks national importance and substantial merit as required.

A personal fitness trainer claimed extraordinary ability based on work with one film production. The AAO affirmed the director's finding that she met only one criterion and lacked evidence of sustained national acclaim or top-tier status.

Long-distance runner sought EB-1A extraordinary ability classification. Claimed three evidentiary criteria: prizes, published material, and original contributions. AAO affirmed one criterion met but rejected published material as limited to local coverage and original contributions absent, failing three-criterion threshold.

Martial arts athlete and coach in taekwondo, muay thai, and hapkido sought extraordinary ability classification. AAO found he met three evidentiary criteria: national awards, published material, and judging. However, the final merits analysis concluded he lacked sustained national or international acclaim required for EB-1A.